The God Who Wasn't There

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by Denny Crane, Feb 8, 2009.

  1. Colonel Ronan

    Colonel Ronan Continue...?

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    19,410
    Likes Received:
    169
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Control Center analyst
    Location:
    Reading, UK
    Do you believe we are related to monkeys though?
     
  2. Colonel Ronan

    Colonel Ronan Continue...?

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    19,410
    Likes Received:
    169
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Control Center analyst
    Location:
    Reading, UK
    I was pretty much saying that both sides of the argument are narrow-minded. I like to see myself in the same way you think... There could be "something" out there but I'm not convinced.
     
  3. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,958
    Likes Received:
    10,630
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    I was kidding. To be serious though, science doesn't have the answers to the ultimate questions like where the first amoeba came from, or what was the state of the universe 100ms before the big bang (or 1 hour or 10 hours...). Or what caused the big bang.
     
  4. Shooter

    Shooter Unanimously Great

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2008
    Messages:
    5,484
    Likes Received:
    152
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    advertising
    Location:
    Blazerville
    There is no example anywhere in the animal kingdom of one species turning into another; i.e., amoeba > human.
     
  5. TradeNurkicNow

    TradeNurkicNow Resident OT Section Crank

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,079
    Likes Received:
    509
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Christ I'm just going to have to quote myself since you ignored me the first time.

     
    Karl Malone's Elbows likes this.
  6. crowTrobot

    crowTrobot die comcast

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,597
    Likes Received:
    208
    Trophy Points:
    63

    again, nobody in this thread has argued AT ALL that there can't be "something out there", let alone been stubborn about it. you're reading your own false assumptions into the conversation.
     
  7. crowTrobot

    crowTrobot die comcast

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,597
    Likes Received:
    208
    Trophy Points:
    63

    you're like kirk cameron holding up a picture of a crockoduck on national TV.
     
  8. crowTrobot

    crowTrobot die comcast

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,597
    Likes Received:
    208
    Trophy Points:
    63


    Bertrand Russell 1952

    should add source if you cut and paste :tsktsk:
     
  9. Colonel Ronan

    Colonel Ronan Continue...?

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    19,410
    Likes Received:
    169
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Control Center analyst
    Location:
    Reading, UK
    Dude, I wasn't even talking to you... /facepalm
     
  10. crowTrobot

    crowTrobot die comcast

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,597
    Likes Received:
    208
    Trophy Points:
    63
    who you were talking to doesn't make you any less wrong lol.
     
  11. Colonel Ronan

    Colonel Ronan Continue...?

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    19,410
    Likes Received:
    169
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Control Center analyst
    Location:
    Reading, UK
    You obviously took my quote out of context. I was simply agreeing with someone else...
     
  12. ly_yng

    ly_yng Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,156
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Robot Mailman
    If you're sitting on a park bench, and you watch a truck drive by, in your reference frame that truck's clock is running slower than yours. And yet, at the same time, to the guy driving the truck, your watch is running slower than his clock. What I'm saying is, my clock is running slower than your clock, and your clock is running slower than my clock, depending on the reference frame you're in.

    That sounds 100% ridiculous. It doesn't seem to make any sense. But it's true. Experiments with planes making flights around the world have verified it.

    The problem is that it's happening on a (very, very small) scale that's removed from our everyday existence. We don't tend to notice effects on the order of hundreths of a millisecond. Similarly, we shouldn't be surprised when effects that happen on the scale of hundreds of thousands of years are similarly counter-intuitive.

    And, to be clear, all of science is theory. Some theories are generally considered "more complete" than others, and I think most biologists would agree that there are more than a few holes in evolution as it stands today. But the core theory, that over many generations organisms change and differentiate as a response to external stimuli, is as close to bulletproof as a theory gets. Scientifically, all that's left to work out are the details.
     

Share This Page