What's the first thing you look at?Personally offense isn't really too important for me. If a certain player scores 20 but allows the other player to score 20 then he's no use.I would take a solid player on both sides of the ball than one which can only produce great offense.
i don't look at any specific attribute, ust the player as a whole. i may use certain attributes to finally determine it, but first i don't look at any specific part of their game.
I would say I do the same... as a wholeSometimes I compare what each player does best and compare who does what they do best better (make sense?)I'm not that deep analysis kind of person
I'll give you an examplePlayer A is great on offense, decent passer but lacks in defensePlayer B is mediocre on offense but his defense is great. He's also a good passer.Who is better and who would you take?
I would actually take player A. A great offensive player is hard to find. B sounds more like a role player and those are good players to build around player A.
