What do we have now? Twenty people down or so? As I understand it, no guns were used except by the police. The assailant(s) used knives and vehicles to mangle people.
In fairness they're famous for not moving when they guard over there...sudden movement might make them cramp up!
If Brits were a free people, the perpetrator would likely have been shot and stopped on the bridge by an armed citizen, preventing the further injuries and ensuing threat to Parliament members.
Not waste, not a nut and he sure doesn't appear Asian. Seem like another son of Islam answering the call to Jihad. http://pamelageller.com/2017/03/fir...officer-dies-dead-catastrophic-injuries.html/
If random violence is justified by a religion, that religion is terribly wrong. Such acts are not sane or normal. Common sense suggests that a person who is thinking straight would never choose to kill or hurt dozens of random strangers. If a religion teaches random violence against those that have different beliefs, that religion is evil, sinful, and unholy.