I think you mean 32 million. https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1...z.....6..35i39j0i131j0i131i20i264.CzhIW2BZlhM
He might have got 40 million more votes than Hillary but Trump would have got every registered Republican to vote for him.
Because that's what the rules said. [That is, the rules say the superdelegates get votes, and that they are free to vote for who they want.] And why should Trump be president when Hillary got more votes? Because that's what the rules said. barfo
And the notion that Bernie wouldn't be able to win the middle is complete fallacy. Why does he win his state with 71%? Vermont ain't that blue. That's a lot of independents and republicans that voted for him. People need to stop saying that. He would've TROUNCED Drumpf if that bitch didn't cheat him...
Not this. Not that I'm saying they played fair, or that they should be excused for it. But I'm having a hard time seeing how Bernie would have won the primaries anyway. Do we really think that millions of voters would have voted for Bernie rather than Hillary if the debates had been on different nights? Or if Hillary had not gotten a fairly predictable debate question? And remember that what Bernie won was mostly caucuses, which tend to be dominated by activists that are less representative of the overall population. barfo
You're really asking this black person how he feels about the Democratic debates being scheduled at the same date/time as the BET Hip Hop awards? Please don't do that.
Right??!!! I would have watched either of those things but the Clark County regional fly fishing semi-finals was on at the same time. It was a tough call.
After the last election and the current presidency, there may never be a better opportunity for an independent to win the presidency than in 2020. All the bullshit from decades of these two parties' reign has bubbled up the the surface for the world to see. If people don't vote against these two corrupt parties in 2020 we are too far gone.
