Game Thread GAME# 45: BLAZERS @ KINGS - JANUARY 14, 2019 - MONDAY, 7:00 PM, NBCSNW

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Darkwebs, Jan 13, 2019.

?

Which option would be better for the Blazers?

Poll closed Jan 20, 2019.
  1. Justin Jackson + Harry Giles

    26.2%
  2. Zach Collins

    73.8%
  1. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    32,058
    Likes Received:
    40,418
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Let's not get it twisted. The opposition to "hot hand" theory simply states that Dame being 7-for-8 from 3 doesn't indicate that he's any more likely to make the ninth shot than if he were 1-for-8 prior to that same shot.

    The probability of Nurk making a shot is based on Nurk's ability. The probability of Dame or CJ making a shot is based on their abilities. The abilities are not equal, so no, Nurk is not "as likely to make it as Dame".
     
  2. blue9

    blue9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Messages:
    10,729
    Likes Received:
    7,169
    Trophy Points:
    113
    /end
     
  3. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    No, you don't understand the math, so you're just throwing out terms like "mental state" and "experience" and other garbage that is completely useless in any concrete sense.

    If it can't be quantified, and isn't determined from previous outcomes, then how would Stotts know when somebody has a "hot hand"?
     
  4. Blazers Roy

    Blazers Roy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2015
    Messages:
    2,621
    Likes Received:
    2,909
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Jerusalem, Israel
    He doesnt know the difference between a white big and an Eastern European big.
     
  5. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,452
    Likes Received:
    38,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Why didn't yall make this a meme? Yall failed.
     
    Chris Craig likes this.
  6. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,452
    Likes Received:
    38,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    From someone who played college ball, trust me. PTLDPlatypus is 100% correct.
     
  7. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,452
    Likes Received:
    38,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    I oFfIcIaLlY nOmInAtE tHiS...
     
  8. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    No, it matters, but not for reasons the reasons you outlined (current game %) or last few shots. It depends on their expected, large sample size shooting percentages, how the defense is guarding them, etc, etc.

    No, you're confusing expected probabilities and percentages with "hot hand". Dame has a higher percentage, given a large enough sample size, that the expectation is that he's more likely to make the shot than Nurk.

    Again, you're missing the point and building a strawman from a false premise.

    Nope. But I sure am glad Stotts pays attention to analytics instead of listening to fans throw out irrational, baseless claims.
     
  9. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    So the opinion of somebody playing at a tiny college, barely above high school level, overrides math and statistics? Got it.
     
  10. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,452
    Likes Received:
    38,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Could be someone who plays simply at the high school level. Maybe not even as high. When you're talking about a zone a player gets in that's not easily quantifiable, yes.
     
    TBpup likes this.
  11. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Yet the data and stats show that this "zone" doesn't exist.

    You're confusing causation and correlation. You only feel like you're in a zone once you've made a few shots in a row. But that has no predictive power about the outcome of the next shots.
     
  12. hoopsjock

    hoopsjock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    16,302
    Likes Received:
    26,279
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Business Owner
    Location:
    North Plains
    So confidence level has no impact on results at all?
     
    UKRAINEFAN and BonesJones like this.
  13. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,452
    Likes Received:
    38,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Here's an example of "being in the zone" -- In my league, it's call your own fouls. Whenever there's some drama that legitimately pisses me off, it gets me in a bit of a zone. I almost always shoot a 3 right afterwards and hit 80-90% of them, even if I've been struggling all night. That's not "being in the zone once a few shots are made".

    Shooting is as much a mental thing as it is physical. That's basketball in general. "The zone" is a mental state where you're essentially locked it. When I'm in the zone, I don't even feel anything when I shoot, and almost everything goes in. It's almost a feeling of lightheadedness (in a good way) or euphoria, and sometimes I enter it without even taking a shot. It's actually been proven by science but I read the piece a couple years ago and can't remember what it was.

    It's essentially, a state of hyperfocus.
     
    Darkwebs and hoopsjock like this.
  14. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,452
    Likes Received:
    38,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
  15. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    That is what the research shows. Feel free to read the research paper I linked earlier.
     
  16. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Humans are notoriously bad about claiming they see patterns that don't exist.
     
  17. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,452
    Likes Received:
    38,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    In my senior year in high school, we were playing against our rivals who I hated. There were many kids there that would (essentially) bully me in 6th grade, when I was an awkward, uncoordinated kid. I switched schools in 6th grade, and that's the last they heard or saw of me until then, but they remembered me. Probably surprised I ended up playing varsity basketball. During dead balls, I would go stand in front of their student section on purpose and they were lighting me up. It'd make me remember of the fucked up things they did in the past, and it'd get me pissed, but now I had a sense of control on the court. I could make them pay, essentially.

    I had 17 points in 18 minutes on 5-6 or something like that and hit a three to start the 2nd half. Started feeling really confident and almost cocky. Hit the next three after that. At that point, I KNEW that whatever 3pt shot I got, I was going to make. I knew it as well as I knew my own name. I knew it as well as I knew my own mother. I've never been in that much of a zone and state of mind before. I would've put my life on each 3pt shot I took after it. I knew I would make literally everything. The last 3 I made, it literally felt as easy as being over the rim and dunking it.

    But as the "post" in the system, I didn't get another shot for 3 minutes afterwards, and then I got subbed out because we were up 30-something. But trust me, it exists.
     
    Darkwebs likes this.
  18. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,452
    Likes Received:
    38,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Haha. That's a cop out response.
     
    hoopsjock likes this.
  19. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Your random anectdotal stories don't prove anything other that you don't understand the underlying statistics.
     
  20. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,452
    Likes Received:
    38,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    You have no clue what you're talking about. You can't quantify a mental state. Making one three doesn't mean a player is in the zone, so your statistics are likely flawed based on previous makes when players aren't even "in the zone". I love how your trying to tell others that a mental state is false... A mental state that they've experienced, that's back by science, that you've never experienced.
     

Share This Page