If this animal's skin was a shade darker, Trump would be rage tweeting about the case until his fingers bled. But since he is white and right(wing) we get deafening silence. How does anybody defend this piece of shit?
Oh my gawd Trump doesn't push things that don't fit his agenda. We got a first in American politics people. A politician who doesn't tweet about things the leftists want to hear. ORANGE MAN BAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!! His silence is a dog whistle calling people to action. What we've got here is stochastic terrorism. Lock him up. Seriously though, all sarcasm aside (the previous should be obvious) it is EASY to defend a bad person when the people who attack him are total hypocrites.
At least you realize that what you are doing is defending a bad person. Peculiar hobby, that, but whatever floats your boat. barfo
I don’t think there are good people on the alt right. I dislike trump but when he said the good people on both sides thing I don’t think he meant alt right but hey, you’re gonna believe whatever you wanna believe
So uh, humor me here. Wouldn't the reverse be someone attacking a person for things that aren't bad because they think that person is bad?
I still don't know who the "alt right" is. If they're all white supremacists then sure they're all bad. If there are some that aren't but they have different views why does that make them bad?
Yeah that’s true. These “progressive” types have all sorts of odd definitions so being alt right could be anything to them. To me it’s the tiki torch guys or anybody with nazi tattoos and ideologies that are obviously racist.
Well, someone not attacking a person for things that are bad because they think the person is good would be the reverse of someone attacking a person for things that are aren't bad because they think the person is bad but I'm not sure how that specifically relates to suggesting that other people's hypocrisy is a valid defense for Trump's words/actions. barfo
Alt-Right was never defined by progressives. Here's what Wikipedia says: "The alt-right, or alternative right, is a loosely connected and somewhat ill-defined grouping of American white supremacists/white nationalists, white separatists, anti-Semites, neo-Nazis, neo-fascists, neo-Confederates, Holocaust deniers, conspiracy theorists and other far-right fringe hate groups." "White supremacist Richard B. Spencer initially promoted the term in 2010 in reference to a movement centered on white nationalism; according to the Associated Press, he did so to disguise overt racism, white supremacism, neo-fascism and neo-Nazism." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-right
You don't think? In other words you don't know then. Trunps history speaks louder than your opinion in this case.
Wait wait what? Conspiracy theorists are now part of the alt right according to Wikipedia? Since when? I disagree with that. A lot of conspiracies have nothing to do with alt right related things. What I was saying though is that a lot of people will make their own definition of it and just call people it and it’s not right. They base it off of their own definition and not the logical one
Well yeah exactly I just find that ridiculous because some people will look at that definition and say exactly what Lanny said. Oh well it’s on Wikipedia, must be right. Every conspiracy theorist is alt right!!! Like what?
For some who choose to only read articles and click on links from approved writers and posters only, should show you the depth of ignorance...
I don't think it's correct to read that as "all conspiracy theorists are part of the alt-right". More like "the alt-right includes some conspiracy theorists". barfo