I don't know what's better. I get to watch Westbrick ruin Houston. Or OKC fans crying because they can't standing their favorite player. In a Rockettes uniform.
Lakers can't match salaries, so there's no path with a trade no team is going buy-out a 3-year/123M deal, so the chances of Paul being a free agent to sign there seem nil that leaves Paul walking away from 123M so he can play for the minimum in LA....snowball meet hell
This makes as much sense as tits on a camels ass. I don't see any way either team benefits. And, what could be better than that? Helluva summer.
Paul has 141 million left on his contract. I can guarantee you with 1000% certainty he's not getting bought out.
OKC does not need to buy him out. They can keep him on the team and trade every player they can for more draft picks over the next 3 seasons. They could also trade him at a later time. No need to cut him if he's still a viable player that can be traded for assets later on down the road.
Because i tell Paul he's taking 50 cents on the dollar or else he can sit in OKC for two years. Forget about what other players or agents think; there is no loyalty anyway.
Cuz he wants to play with the Lakers that bad? I wouldn't care if I was Presti; it's take it or stay here.
There's no precedent for a player giving away 50% of his guaranteed money in a buyout, much less when that 50% guaranteed is 70 million. If Paul does it, props to him, but the chances of that happening are about as good as the Phoenix Suns winning the title next year.
Idk why this isn’t a three way that centers around: Houston: Westbrook OKC: Dragic, Johnson, picks Miami: CP3, maybe a pick?