Cameras don't take photos, photographers take photos. The camera is an inanimate object and only a tool/instrument/weapon depending on how it is used by the human being who is 100% responsible for it's use and the consequences of it's use.
Racists come in every color, and most racists are not of the supremacist variety. In the real world, most racists view a single race as threatening or inferior in some way, while having no issues at all with other races. The overwhelming majority of Americans oppose illegal immigration for sensible and legitimate reasons which have nothing to do with race (national security, safety for their families, upholding the laws Congress wrote for numerous reasons crucial to our country's survival, prevention of slavery, drug smuggling, human trafficking, forced prostitution, selling of children, murder, and kidnapping). They fully support legal immigration as designed by Congress under the important guidelines which were, again, written by Congress, and encourage these immigrants to seek citizenship and become Real Americans. The Democrats are the party of slavery, drug smuggling, human trafficking, forced prostitution, selling of children, murder, and kidnapping.
I would say you're almost certainly wrong. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/...link-between-autism-and-violence-isn-t-autism
Apparently guns are people because a slogan on the right is that gun rights are human rights. The comment about bats reminds me of my first year of high school, we had to take a general knowledge test. One of the questions was about spiders being insects. They are not. My answer was marked wrong. I brought in nature books, encyclopedia, finally got thet teacher to mark my answer correct but he refused to change the exam question.
There are a ton of camera's that take pictures / video without any human behind it snapping the pictures...
This study is Swedish, in a certain county in Sweden. We want to know about America, because that's where the young, male mass shooters are. This also looks at "violence" and autism, not "mass shootings"and autism.
1. Psychology Today is a magazine published every two months in the United States since 1967. Is autism different in different countries? 2. Isn't mass shooting violence?
It appears so. The statistics were taken from a population that is not the United States, which seems to be unique in their mass shooting problem with troubled youth. I don't believe it is only autism, but the way that autism is managed in youth. Like I stated, there are likely many parents in the United States who will ignore their child's autistic tendencies and not give them proper care or management, which will result in some disastrous consequences. The first step in stopping in these mass shooting is identifying those who have the potential or propensity to get these guns and commit mass shootings and stop them before they do.
I give up on you. There simply is no way to reason with you. I think this may have been noted by many others in here.
You continuously throw red herrings. I say there may be a link between Mass shooters and Autism in the United States. You bring up a study from Sweden which talks about "violence" in general. Until there are a string of stable, popular, non-alienated, non-anti-social, non-weirdo, non-psychotic mass shooters, then you aren't changing my mind. These shooters are outcasts in society. They aren't normies in society.
"The period after a mass shooting is often very telling.When the shooter is white, the context is the individual narrative – this individual disordered white mind. When the shooter is black or brown, all of a sudden the disorder is culture. The narrative we tell then is about terrorism or gangs."
Such as? I mean what examples do you have on this? Are you talking about drive by shootings in Chicago? Of course those are going to be gang related. The big mass shooting in Oregon was a black (or half black) shooter who was autistic. No one said anything about gangs or terrorism I believe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umpqua_Community_College_shooting
How many deaths would you say qualifies as a "mass serial killers". Because I'm willing to bet if the number is over 4, there are way more gang related deaths than what people would traditionally describe as a "mass shooting".
All of the recent shooters who were white you claim have autism and they committed their crimes because of a disorder. Two instances of Black shooters The Dallas Shooter Virginia Beach In general the narratives stick to what my above post indicated.
Not sure I follow. 50 is a number greater than 4. How many gang related shootings involve 50 or more deaths? barfo
