Politics Public Impeachment Hearings

I doubt it because the entire Schiff show is a veritable sham.

 

Probably about as likely as hearing trump tell the truth.

 

Yes, because well, ummm, you and your ilk as well as your Fuhrer say so.

Lemme ask ask you a simple question, if you and Trump and his followers truly feel he is being mistreated/framed or whatever, wouldn't it make sense to not only allow, but also insist that the people who might be able to clear him (Rudy, Mulvany, Pompeo, Bolton, etc.) be called to testify?


fwiw, I seriously doubt I'll get a coherent response.

 

Is your head buried in the sand? Or are you screaming with your fingers jammed in your ears?

Holy hell, how can people be this jaded?

 

No.

 

I'll say it again, the Dems have been so hell-bent on removing Trump from office since day-1, I don't believe ANYTHING they trot out,,,,including the Schiff show. They (including most democracts in general) were in complete and utter shock that Trump got elected, it's been an unabashed hate-fest ever since. I voted for Trump but would've highly preferred Kasich...and would support Kasich if he were to run this time around.....which apparently he won't. That said, if I knew what Hunter Biden was doing while his dad was VP...I'd want answers, too,....whether his dad was an opponent of mine, or not.

 

So, your argument is, the Democrats had claimed Trump is bad, he is proven bad, but you do not believe it because they thought so before they presented the evidence?

 

lol, well it's impossible to refute that kind of logic though. <rolls eyes>

 

i don't know whether to laugh or cry at this defense.

 

No, what I'm claiming is, they've been butt-hurt over him getting elected since day-1.....to the point of multiple tactics and strategies in attempts to remove him. We were hearing that (impeachment) cry the day after he was elected. I mean, like, the day after.

 

Trump has 3 children running around the world making $ off their daddy's position. That doesn't matter, right?

WITH GOOD FUCKING REASON. It has been proven by multiple non-partisan entities in DC that Russia helped him win the election. Why is that OK with you?

 

So, if he is proven to have subverted the law, why does it matter?

 

Absolutely, it matters. Let's see where this goes, though. If he's proven guilty - despite the circus - and is impeached/removed, I'll abide by that and move on.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/sep/27/ted-cruz-democrats-still-angry-at-the-voters-who-e/

 

What Schiff needs to do to close this today is to repeatedly highlight the obstruction by the administration and the disobedience to congressional subpoenas.

If you're so innocent, then fucking prove it. Only criminals hide from the truth while obstructing justice. And only the brainwashed and clueless can't see this.

 

I take it that you're not going to answer my simple question?

 

Devin Nunes is an embarrassment.

 

I am sorry?

Your honor, my client did murder this person - but his mother called the police to tell them he was going to do it a week ago - so it does not matter?

Seriously?

 

Funny how you call everything the democrats do a sham while the circus is happening on the other side. Have you read any of trumps tweets on Schiff today? Do you approve of a sitting president calling a VOTED in member of congress "scum" on social media? Is that how you view what a president should do?

 

Sure it does. But, they could (and certainly would) also be highly discredited by the other side, as well.