Politics Coronavirus crisis shows need for wealth tax, basic income, Financial Times editorial argues

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by SlyPokerDog, Apr 6, 2020.

  1. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    116,223
    Likes Received:
    114,263
    Trophy Points:
    115
  2. TorturedBlazerFan

    TorturedBlazerFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    19,824
    Likes Received:
    23,356
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Baby Daddy
    Location:
    Chasing my kids
    I totally disagree. The fact that all these political leaders have the ability to at the sign of a bill bail out their corporate sponsored buddies, give themselves raises, slide in political agenda’s give Billions to, “Other”, doesn't in my mind equate to we should give them more power and be more dependent on them.
    The Bill that many have cited as socialism is really more or less Crony capitalism.
    Yet we think these same people should be given authority of our health, of our livelihoods? I think they need less power not more.
     
    stampedehero and tester551 like this.
  3. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    17,596
    Likes Received:
    11,213
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What does that have to do with a wealth tax and basic income?
     
  4. TorturedBlazerFan

    TorturedBlazerFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    19,824
    Likes Received:
    23,356
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Baby Daddy
    Location:
    Chasing my kids
    A lot. Taxes go to corrupt government officials to do what they please with it. UBI is the process of furthering people’s reliance on the government. So you in one fell swoop give these people who just used COVID19 to give themselves a raise, more money and we make ourselves more dependent on them at the same time.

    edit: for the record they didnt pass the version that gave them the raise, but it was proposed.


    HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

    Salaries And Expenses

    For an additional amount for “Salaries and Expenses”, $25,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2021, except that $5,000,000 shall remain available until expended, to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus, domestically or internationally, to be allocated in accordance with a spend plan submitted to the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives by the Chief Administrative Officer and approved by such Committee: Provided, That such amount is designated by the Congress as being for an emergency requirement pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.
     
    stampedehero likes this.
  5. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    17,596
    Likes Received:
    11,213
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You're taking more money away from the wealthy in that wealth tax. At the same time giving a basic income to everyone under x amount of yearly income. It's taking from the top percentages and giving to the lower percentages. Does it give them extra money for pet projects? Maybe. Is it coming off of the buffets and gates's and musk's of the country instead of me and you? Absolutely. So fund your pet projects off your rich friends, and give me something out of it. I dont see how something like a wealth tax is construed as a negative. I dont see how basic income could be either.
     
  6. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    17,596
    Likes Received:
    11,213
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I guess my point is, as you pointed out, they have the ability to sign a bill and bail out their buddies. They do. Andthe wealthy aren't paying extra on that. And it's going to bail out their buddies, not the people under 100k. It seems like you're responding as a general comment to the bill recently passed, and less to the idea of a wealth tax and basic income. So currently, no basic income, no wealth tax, congress can bail out buddies. Under generic proposed idea...wealth tax, basic income, and they can still bail out their buddies. Yet, at least, under the 2nd one, bailing out their buddies is also going to come at a larger expense to their buddies. Not us
     
  7. TorturedBlazerFan

    TorturedBlazerFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    19,824
    Likes Received:
    23,356
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Baby Daddy
    Location:
    Chasing my kids
    Lets do some math...
    We want to have the wealthy support say, 150,000,000 people. With say something that might barely pay someone's food for a month 1k. That is 150,000,000,000‬ per month. For a year that's, 1,800,000,000,000 how long do you think the .1%ers can keep that up? Oh, wait they can't for very long. So the government starts to tax corporations, which is fine but eventually all you've done is make two classes, the ultra-elite oligarchs who have all the power and don't tax themselves cause their public 'servants' and everyone else is completely 100% dependent on them.
     
    Last edited: Apr 6, 2020
    bodyman5000 and 1 likes this.
  8. TorturedBlazerFan

    TorturedBlazerFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    19,824
    Likes Received:
    23,356
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Baby Daddy
    Location:
    Chasing my kids
    I think it's an interesting idea, UBI and wealth taxes, but I don't think it's sustainable, and I don't think long term it is viable. I have no problem taxing the wealthy more and their corporations for one they need to stop creating tax loopholes for guys like Jeff Bezos and his companies. I also think that through this experience I look at the government and people in charge and think wow I really don't want to be any more reliant on you guys then we are already are.

    I actually really liked Yang, he was maybe the one guy of the Democrats I thought sounded like he had some new idea's, I questioned the 1k a month and all that with him as well, but UBI maybe in the future has some merit to it, but at least right now IMO, I just don't think the numbers add up. We need massive changes to the system at large, on a scale larger than let the .01er's pay for it, for that type of system to work IMO.
     
    RR7 likes this.
  9. HailBlazers

    HailBlazers RipCity

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    18,843
    Likes Received:
    15,508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PDX
    Communism is, an interesting idea...
     
  10. EL PRESIDENTE

    EL PRESIDENTE Username Retired in Honor of Lanny.

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    50,346
    Likes Received:
    22,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Less people = bigger slice of UBI!

    Kick the illegals the fuck out, son!
    Stricter borders.
    More nationalism.
    Dependance on being self sufficient.
    More telecommuting.
    Same with school. E learning!
     
  11. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    32,643
    Likes Received:
    22,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    Ah, the silver lining of the pandemic.

    barfo
     
  12. EL PRESIDENTE

    EL PRESIDENTE Username Retired in Honor of Lanny.

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    50,346
    Likes Received:
    22,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nah, kicking illegals out and having stricter immigration requirements would be a much better outcome.

    Less strain on healthcare too.
     
  13. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    17,596
    Likes Received:
    11,213
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We already give enough government money to farmers. I don't wanna see their cries for $$ if they can't get cheap labor
     
  14. EL PRESIDENTE

    EL PRESIDENTE Username Retired in Honor of Lanny.

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    50,346
    Likes Received:
    22,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We can use migrant workers.
     
    bodyman5000 and 1 likes this.
  15. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    20,710
    Likes Received:
    32,569
    Trophy Points:
    113
    how did you get to 150 million?

    only 38 million live below the poverty line, and I'm guessing the template wouldn't pay children the same as adults. But as a liberal who spent 40 years self-employed, I'm not sure I'm in favor of UBI. Maybe some form

    I'm certainly in favor of much higher taxes on the wealthy and corporations along with closing all those offshore loopholes...(an 'easy' place to start is to shit-can the stupidly low ceiling on SS taxes. It's around 138K now but should be in the 10 million range, or higher...solves any future funding issues of SS)

    certainly these ideas merit debate and discussion
    *****************************************************

    just a somewhat related random observation: whenever single-payer or medicare for all comes up a lot of people go ballistic about the cost and the scope of the potential system. Of course taxes would go significantly higher, but would the off-set of no insurance premiums be greater than the additional taxes? Has anybody ever looked at that?
     
    RR7 likes this.
  16. TorturedBlazerFan

    TorturedBlazerFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    19,824
    Likes Received:
    23,356
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Baby Daddy
    Location:
    Chasing my kids
    Yes they have and the numbers seem to vary depending on where you look. With some saying overall its cheaper, and some saying its worse my guess is theres a lot of political and personal bias’ involved when coming to the formula’s for it. Especially since Ive seen people claim its like 20 trillion more expensive over 10 years and some say its like 100’s of billions less.

    The 150M was just a little less than half of the country. Even if you cut it down to 40M its still ridiculously expensive if the “rich” are the only ones paying for it, I used 1k a month (which isnt much too).

    Im definitely ok with forcing Rich and ultra rich corporations to pay their fair share (and more), I think all these loop holes to get out of paying stuff needs smacked into oblivion too.
     
  17. donkiez

    donkiez Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Messages:
    4,235
    Likes Received:
    3,259
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I believe that is the primary bases for Bernie Sanders whole campaign. But you know something..something...cuba
     
    RR7 likes this.
  18. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    20,710
    Likes Received:
    32,569
    Trophy Points:
    113
    IIRC, health care cost 3.6 trillion in 2019. So, assuming some inflation maybe 40 trillion over 10 years. But how much of that 40 trillion goes to insurance companies? I'm guessing it's a significant percentage. And how much is eaten up by duplication 200 times over because of all the various corporations and entities involved in the circus?

    another factor: with a single payer system, federal taxes are going to jump but state taxes are going to drop. A couple of examples: in 2015, Oregon 'spent 10.2 billion on health care. California spent 92 billion. Now, much of that, about 70-80%, is pass-thru medicaid spending. If you figure the two states only chip in 20% of that total spending, then California and Oregon paid 20 billion in 2018 (2 billion for Oregon). That was 2015. So then, over a 10 year period that's 200 billion. Not all of that will be saved because I'd imagine a large chunk of it would be. That's probably another offset of 2-3 trillion over 10 years

    and like it or now, maybe the best run federal program has been Medicare. Sure, it has funding issues but that's because of the political divide.
     
    RR7 and donkiez like this.
  19. TorturedBlazerFan

    TorturedBlazerFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    19,824
    Likes Received:
    23,356
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Baby Daddy
    Location:
    Chasing my kids
    Ive seen several sets of numbers and like I said they vary greatly on how expensive single payer healthcare would be. There are other factors though, last I saw about 550k people are employed by insurance companies, what do we do with those people? Especially after the last month or so when unemployment just spiked and will continue too for a while, were just adding to the people in the poverty line. Healthcare is probably the one, “socialist” for lack of a better term thing I can actually get somewhat on board with, something feels wrong about for profit healthcare IMO, there should not be financial incentive to keeping people unhealthy, or addicted to prescription medications.
    Crony capitalist health care obviously doesnt work. Ive heard of a “subscription” model of health care in parts of the mid-west that I think sounds interesting, I think its like $40 a month and everything but catastrophic is covered. - I am not saying thats the answer either.

    I am definitely cynical and jaded towards the government and big businesses too, but I guess I see a lot of this as leading to just more power and money into the hands of high ranking government officials and Im extremely uncomfortable with that.

    I know its extremely un-American, but I would absolutely be in favor of taking away the feds and becoming like a dozen or so countries. At the very least to me States should have more power to govern how they see fit for their needs and the power of the federal government should be much less intrusive. Im not much of a globalist I guess.
     
  20. Lanny

    Lanny Original Season Ticket Holder "Mr. Big Shot"

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    26,638
    Likes Received:
    16,945
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Elec. & Computer Engineer OSU Computer Science PSU
    Location:
    Lake Oswego, OR
    Oh boy, I love math, But I think you really mean let's do some arithmetic.
     

Share This Page