Notice Melo or Ariza?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by CupWizier, Aug 16, 2020.

  1. CupWizier

    CupWizier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    11,265
    Likes Received:
    7,664
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired
    Could come down to choosing one or the other. Keeping Ariza will cost $12.8 mil and Melo would need a new contract. Do we pay Ariza 12.8 and then let him walk or try and trade him at the deadline or do we try and sign Melo to a reasonable contract for 3 years with a possible team option? Of course a lot will depend on where Hood is on his rehabbing, but with the emergence of Trent who can play the 3 makes Ariza a bit more expendable. I'm kind of leaning with a Melo, Trent and even Hezonja rotation at small forward. Make the focus for a back up PG and starting PF. Melo can also play some PF in certain situations. If we don't re=sign Whiteside then Collins can slip over and be a c/pf backup.

    Thoughts?
     
    42N8Bounce likes this.
  2. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    31,952
    Likes Received:
    40,230
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I assume you're suggesting that we would need to free up cap space to keep Melo, which is what would necessitate waiving Ariza.

    My thought is that if keeping Melo is worth waiving Ariza, then he would also be worth re-signing by using our mid-level exception, in which case waiving Ariza would be unnecessary.
     
    Darkwebs likes this.
  3. Rastapopoulos

    Rastapopoulos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    37,389
    Likes Received:
    21,980
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballin'
    How bout neither? Melo's like Enes Kanter: a flawed guy who's playing great in a playoff run, but you can do better. The only reason to keep Ariza (and have him take minutes that should be used developing Nas) is because he has a useful contract for a trade.
     
    STOMP, Ed O and wizenheimer like this.
  4. AmirIcon

    AmirIcon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Messages:
    5,351
    Likes Received:
    4,901
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Writer, Director, Actor
    Nobody is keeping Ariza for that price. We should prioritize keeping Melo for sure.
     
  5. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    66,305
    Likes Received:
    64,444
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The best way to develop Nas is to keep Ariza and make Nas beat him for the rotation spot....Ariza is somebody that helps you win now....Nas is a couple years away...if Nas did what Trent did, he could move up the bench quicker...no rush with the young guys while we're winning in my view. I want to see Hood and Melo at the SF if Ariza is gone...what I don't want is 12 different starting lineups next season...like to have a core of rotation players that have chemistry on the court
     
    HailBlazers likes this.
  6. blazerkor

    blazerkor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2014
    Messages:
    13,909
    Likes Received:
    14,825
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm not discussing this as personnel movement, just cap stuff. If you dropped Ariza's near 11 mil but included min cap holds for every open roster spot on the team with a minimum salary cap hold and added our draft pick, while renouncing all of our free agents rights, we'd still be at 106 mil. If the cap stays the same then I guess we could in theory pick up both a free agent with the final 9 mil in cap space (you sound like you'd hope for Melo) and still have our MLE to add one other piece. The guys under contract would be Dame, CJ, Nurk, Zach, Rodney, Ant, Nas, Rio and Gary... we'd pick up a FA (Melo), MLE, our first rounder, two min players. Technically we could use the MLE to pick up two guys and that would free up another close to 1 mil for Melo. You'd have to decide if Ariza is better than what we could get with the MLE or not, that's basically the exchange because the MLE is close to equal to the cap space we would have to sign Melo. That's if Melo demands nearly 10 mil, maybe he'd take half of that and we'd have another 5 mil to pick up another piece... who knows. One thing I do know is this post is basically pointless because the owners will tear up the current CBA so we have no idea what the cap, tax or exceptions will look like for next season if there is a next season.
     
    Darkwebs likes this.
  7. CupWizier

    CupWizier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    11,265
    Likes Received:
    7,664
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired
    No, my intention was merely to get others thoughts on various options.
     
  8. LayneStaley

    LayneStaley Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2018
    Messages:
    5,811
    Likes Received:
    6,233
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Badass
    Location:
    Kirkland, WA
    Keep Ariza, you have to have a wing defender and one who can drain 3s isn’t cheap. No way I’m signing Melo for 3 years! Maybe 2 but I’d prefer 1.
     
  9. Stevenson

    Stevenson Old School

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    Messages:
    4,033
    Likes Received:
    5,056
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Writer
    Location:
    PDX
    Hood?
     
    Eastoff and riverman like this.
  10. LayneStaley

    LayneStaley Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2018
    Messages:
    5,811
    Likes Received:
    6,233
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Badass
    Location:
    Kirkland, WA
    I’d be shocked if Hood was the same player next year. Not just the Achilles, which is tough on most athletes, but the year away from playing. I’m sure he will opt in but I’m not expecting much, I’d take Melo or Ariza over him.
     
    Darkwebs and oldmangrouch like this.
  11. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    20,715
    Likes Received:
    32,575
    Trophy Points:
    113
    a minor quibble: pretty sure if Portland uses cap-space on Melo, they'd only have the room-MLE to use for other free agents; that's about half of the full MLE, a shade under 4.8M. That's not going to get anybody that's good. Just enough for another role-player

    as for Melo, I don't know what his market value will be. I don't think it will be very high. Some of the cap experts can correct me if I'm wrong about this: Melo was signed using a vet minimum. He's played more that 10 seasons so his scale is around 2.56M. I'm wondering if he qualifies for the non-bird exception...? That allows 120% of previous salary. If that's kosher, than Melo could start at a bit over 3.1M. I'm not sure he's worth more than that. He's been great in the bubble, but prior to that he was less than mediocre, and he's another low efficiency ball-stopper with his one-on-one tendencies

    something else, and again, the cap experts can correct me: if Blazers do not renounce the rights to Whiteside, they be eligible for tthe full-MLE of about 9.2M. However if they use more than than 5.7M (amount of tax-MLE) they get hard capped at the apron

    now, if the Blazers aren't concerned about the apron and being hard-capped, not only could they use the full-MLE, thay could also use the 3.6M BAE. However, that's squeezing contract tight enough they may not be able to re-sign Whiteside AND keep Ariza
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2020
    Darkwebs likes this.
  12. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    31,952
    Likes Received:
    40,230
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Clearly. I guess I was just trying to understand why they'd be an either-or proposition? How exactly does waiving Ariza make it easier to keep Melo?
     
    Darkwebs likes this.
  13. CupWizier

    CupWizier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    11,265
    Likes Received:
    7,664
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired
    Never said that. I was just looking at it as an either or. I don't think it's logical to spend money on both is all. You have a different thought, then let's hear it.
     
  14. blazerkor

    blazerkor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2014
    Messages:
    13,909
    Likes Received:
    14,825
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You're totally right, it would cut the exception in half. I'm not sure about the hard cap and again I think this is all a moot point because I think the CBA is going to look totally different.
     
    Darkwebs likes this.
  15. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    21,008
    Likes Received:
    13,564
    Trophy Points:
    113
    One of our weaknesses is the lack of a long perimeter defender who moves well laterally.
    Ariza was known for that coming out of college. (7'2" wing)

    Little also has a 7'2" wing. Does he have the lateral movement? I think he might. Regardless I value that type of player over Melo if
    I could only have one
    . If and when Little develops a consistent 3pt shot he will be a 30 minute per game player for us. Until then I would take a chance on one more year of Ariza.
     
    Darkwebs likes this.
  16. tiredhunter

    tiredhunter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    453
    Trophy Points:
    63
    There are no bird rights in play for Melo, right? I'm not sure he gets more than the MLE elsewhere, so I'm not sure it is an either or scenario, or that Blazers are in the driver seat of the decision. Minutes are an issue, but if Hood comes back healthy and effective, or Little takes that next step you can start looking at trades. If the Blazers can sign Melo though, I'm all for it. If there is a good backup 4 available at the MLE the calculation changes, but that seems unlikely.
     
  17. B-Roy

    B-Roy If it takes months

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    30,244
    Likes Received:
    22,997
    Trophy Points:
    113
    MLE for Melo is crazy. I would not want Melo back for anything more than the vets minimum, and even then I don't trust Stotts to stop playing Melo when he's not doing well.
     
    tester551, Darkwebs and Minstrel like this.
  18. damianlillard

    damianlillard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2013
    Messages:
    838
    Likes Received:
    697
    Trophy Points:
    93
    I much rather have Ariza for his defense and 3 point shot. Also don’t forget that he could also play stretch 4, not just SF. And I feel like Melo stunted the growth of our young players. Can you imagine as a 40% 3 point shooter waiting, Trent, on the top for an open 3 while Melo get double team and does his typical low efficiency fade-away? I would be so mad! Melo show no confidence in any player beside Dame. He literally only pass to Dame and sometime CJ. This guy is a doucebag for that purpose. Trent should be getting more shots but he isn’t because of Melo. Gabriel and Little would be so helpful for this team with their energy and defense but they aren’t because of Melo. The only reason why we play in close game in every freaking game is because of Melo. Don’t tell me how he’s so clutch, the dude is supposed to hit wide open 3s no matter what, that to me isn’t that impressive. With that being said I much rather have Ariza for his ability to play with the defense and does the little things
     
  19. blazerkor

    blazerkor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2014
    Messages:
    13,909
    Likes Received:
    14,825
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I disagree with you. Melo has been a good teammate to everyone and has played Melo ball. The reason why you only see him passing to Dame or CJ most of the time is because Melo's mindset is either to score or reset to a facilitator, he's never seen himself as a facilitator... he also gets the ball to Nurk when Nurk is set up at the top of the key to facilitate, for what it's worth. As far as taking time away from Nas and Wenyen, that's not Melo, it's Stotts. You have your point that he is taking shots away from younger guys and regardless of how much time Stotts gives Melo (theoretically those minutes could go to developing players even though that's not Stotts' M.O.) any shot Melo takes is technically a shot another guy could be taking.
     
    riverman likes this.
  20. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    56,114
    Likes Received:
    53,918
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    I'm surprised at how good Melo has been. Until yesterday, he was ahead of CJ in terms of impact. I hate the five face-up jabstep jabstep 20 foot jumper possessions we spoonfeed him, but he's been dominant in the post, and a knockdown shooter in clutch time. He gives us an air of respect that is a bit intangible, but weirdly important in meaningful games. I'd do an TP MLE for him for 2-3 yrs.

    That said, what Ariza brings us is what we are lacking most on this roster. I'd rather keep both Ariza and Melo, while moving CJ for another tall wing.
     

Share This Page