Trade Ideas Thread

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by BonesJones, Apr 28, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Wizard Mentor

    Wizard Mentor Wizard Mentor

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    13,851
    Likes Received:
    13,649
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Master of Xen Foro
    Location:
    La Grande, OR
    Warning Homer Trade:
    CJ for Dillon Brooks and Jaren Jackson

    Salaries don't match at all until their new contracts kick in. I don't know what date that is.
     
  2. blazerkor

    blazerkor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2014
    Messages:
    13,999
    Likes Received:
    14,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't know if that's so bad as far as talent and fit go but obviously the age thing would be a nonstarter for the Grizz. Also, I think you are saying that they would use their cap space to make this trade work and that would start as soon as the new league year starts, I don't think they've set that date yet.
     
    Wizard Mentor likes this.
  3. boredinsalem

    boredinsalem Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2016
    Messages:
    390
    Likes Received:
    258
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Blazers out: CJ and Ariza
    Blazers in: Jrue and Redick

    NO out: Jrue and Redick
    NO in: Horford and Richardson (and picks from Philly/Portland)

    PHI out: Horford and Richardson
    PHI in: CJ and Ariza

    I like our 9 man rotation a lot:

    Lillard/Redick/Holiday/Melo/Nurkic
    Simons/Trent/Hood/Collins
     
  4. perkinsfor3

    perkinsfor3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2016
    Messages:
    470
    Likes Received:
    504
    Trophy Points:
    93
    I'd like to bring in a Paul George type of roleplayer, but preferably a little more reliable.
     
  5. BoomChakaLaka

    BoomChakaLaka Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,376
    Likes Received:
    2,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Designer / Artist
    Location:
    San Miguel de Allende, Mexico (formerly PDX)
    see page 185 of this thread
     
  6. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,452
    Likes Received:
    38,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Way to much value for Philly and we and NOP get screwed.
     
  7. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    20,938
    Likes Received:
    32,829
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think Portland does fine there. They upgrade at starting SG, getting a better fit. And Reddick for Ariza has good and bad for Portland in it, but I think it's a push. A Dame/Jrue/Trent starting unit with Little on the bench has some potential, especially with the major improvement in defense

    the Pels get screwed though, you're right about that (unless there are draft picks involved?)
     
    UKRAINEFAN likes this.
  8. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    17,610
    Likes Received:
    11,241
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You argued against little at SF because of his height,but you're ok with trent there?
     
  9. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    20,938
    Likes Received:
    32,829
    Trophy Points:
    113
    IIRC, I argued mostly against Little at PF and Trent at SF, but I'm not really happy with either as the starting SF....unless they were there as a result of being in the process of rebooting the roster, which is what would be happening if the Blazers traded CJ for JRue

    I'd think Dame/Jrue/Trent would be a decent transitional perimeter unit, especially considering the upgrade of perimeter defense. Ariza does not seem like much of a long term fit at SF, so he's transitional too. I'd be fine if the Ariza for Reddick part of the trade was dropped.
     
  10. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,452
    Likes Received:
    38,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    So you want to sacrifice shot creation and get a worse offensive fit in Jrue who is set to decline just to downgrade our size and defense at the 3? No thanks.
     
  11. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    20,938
    Likes Received:
    32,829
    Trophy Points:
    113
    what shot creation? CJ?

    CJ creates his own shots for sure, but he's not that good at it.

    and, LOL, Jrue is only 33 days older than Dame. I guess they can "decline" together. And speaking of decline, when will Ariza start?...he's 35.
     
  12. GhostOfPGA

    GhostOfPGA The late great Paul Allen

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2018
    Messages:
    3,222
    Likes Received:
    3,440
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Heaven
    Big risk/reward

    CJ (MAYBE add 16) for MPJ+Harris
     
  13. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,452
    Likes Received:
    38,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Hes not that good at it? Debbie downer strikes again.

    C.J. has bailed out our offense time and time again when it bogs down to nothingness and when teams take away Dame.

    We lose Game 7 of the WCSF last year by double digits if we have Jrue instead of C.J.

    Jrue has also been in the league since 2009, while Dame entered the league 3 years later. Jrue has also been knicked up his entire career.

    Lateral moves sacrificing one area for another at the expense of familiarity and chemistry make 0 sense whatsoever, except to the "grass-is-greener" types.
     
    Cugel likes this.
  14. blazerkor

    blazerkor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2014
    Messages:
    13,999
    Likes Received:
    14,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I wouldn't add the 16th pick and I'd have them add Monte Morris to make salaries work and to add value. I don't think that is a good deal for Denver but I also think with MPJ's attitude and injury history we have to mitigate the risk. If Denver wants to win now then they would do the deal. If they are content waiting a couple more seasons to let everyone mature then that would likely be the smarter move 16th pick or not but on our side we have to make it worth the risk. I do like Gary Harris next to Dame though, he defends much better than CJ and hits the spot up three however he's not in CJ's stratosphere as a scorer.
     
  15. damianlillard

    damianlillard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2013
    Messages:
    838
    Likes Received:
    697
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Quick question, do you think the blazers should trade CJ? If so what kind of players would you aim for?
     
  16. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    20,938
    Likes Received:
    32,829
    Trophy Points:
    113
    no...he's not that good at

    * in isolation possessions, CJ averaged 0.88 points/possession. That was only in the 56th percentile (44% of the league was better) in the league, and that was 13.3% of his possessions. Dame scored 1.07 ppp in isolation on 18% of his possessions and that was good enough for the 87th percentile

    * in PnR ball-handler, which was 36.3% of CJ's possessions, he averaged 0.93 ppp which was only good enough for the 71st percentile. Dame averaged 1.15 ppp which was in the 96th percentile, and that was 52% of his possessions.

    those are the two most 'create-your-own-offense' types of possessions. By weight, that means CJ was somewhere around the 66th percentile leaving 1/3 of the league better at shot creation and that actually accounted for about 50% of CJ's possessions. CJ isn't nearly as good at it as you are implying. On the other hand, Dame is elite at shot creation, being somewhere in the 93rd percentile, and that accounted for 70% of his possessions. A big difference is that an essential component of creating offense is creating FT opportunities and CJ is terrible at that. Always has been, always will be

    another play type that accounted for 14.5% of CJ's possessions was transition. Definitely a possession that would gauge some ball handling and shot creation. Well, CJ was only in the 45th percentile in that category. That's approaching two thirds of CJ's possessions, plays dependent on 'shot creation', and CJ is hovering around the 60th percentile. That's not impressive. But I don't demerit him a lot for transition offense because the entire team sucks at it

    meanwhile, CJ is in the 83rd percentile in spot-up possessions (14% of his shots). He's in the 75th percentile in off-screen shots.

    And CJ ranks 8th in the NBA among perimeter players in eFG% on catch-and-shoot. That's elite

    but that illustrates the problem. CJ's prowess in creating his own offense is more mythical than real. Yes, he does it a lot, but he's not very efficient. He's much better on plays that don't see him dribbling like crazy, burning shot clock, and stopping the damn ball. His assisted FG rate is half of what it should be. He needs to play a lot more like Klay Thompson and a lot less like Dame. Yeah, every once in a while he'll have a hot game and his fans will point to it repeatedly, forgetting about all his nothing-burger games where he did the same thing but shot bricks while hogging the ball.

    and you say he's "bailed out" the Blazers in games. Sure, he's done that but Portland would not need to be bailed out so often if CJ wasn't such a huge sieve on defense. That's where Holiday would be a big help (he was in the 88th percentile in isolation by the way).
     
    Propagandist and UKRAINEFAN like this.
  17. KSF-ERIC

    KSF-ERIC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2019
    Messages:
    8,659
    Likes Received:
    6,450
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No. Dame did. Nothing Westbrook or Donovan could've done about it.
     
  18. KSF-ERIC

    KSF-ERIC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2019
    Messages:
    8,659
    Likes Received:
    6,450
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think we can get PG without giving up CJ. PG's stock is low.
     
  19. GDiama

    GDiama Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2016
    Messages:
    1,565
    Likes Received:
    1,398
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I m pretty sure even if somehow salaries matched they would decline CJ for MPJ straight up. MPJ's ceiling is extremely high to ignore and his age fits perfectly their young group as it is right now. I also don't think CJ would be very good in their offense. Jokic and Murray handle the ball the rest of the Nuggets spot up for three or cut to the basket. I think although CJ has great offensive talent he doesn't fit.
     
    UKRAINEFAN likes this.
  20. Cugel

    Cugel The epitome of mediocrity

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2019
    Messages:
    5,330
    Likes Received:
    5,205
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Canvas Repairman
    Every gm and coach knows Paul George is still an all star caliber player. Sure a shitty game 7 but game 6 he was there. Clippers will keep him
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page