Well, I've been too busy contemplating the QAnon theories, while giving equal time to the Flat Earth theories and the Clinton Hit List and the pesky Illuminati (of course)...
The e-mails (which are in textual format) show nothing but gossip. They are not worth a plug nickel and anyone who falls for them knows nothing about how e-mails are transmitted on the Web and is particularly gullible.
Not to mention stupid for people believing that they are confirmed real. This subject is for dumb people who not only know nothing about how e-mails have headers but don't even have the curiosity to ask those with the technical know how what the hell is going on.
Not to answer for TBpup, but there seems to be at least some reason to believe that the primary email quoted by the NY Post is authentic. The recipient, Tony Bobulinski was quoted yesterday as saying it was "genuine". He's been asked by the FBI to sit down for an interview with them today. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fb...ex-associate-tony-bobulinski-senate-committee Am I buying the whole story? No, not yet. Do I think that there's reason to question Joe's "nothing to see here" attitude? Yup. Do I think that Giuliani has been holding this for an October surprise smear and is pretty much a dirt bag? Yup. In other words, situation normal for an election these days in the good ol' US of A.
Ah, finally a response that at least entains an open mind. I appreciate the attacks and character assinations for simply asking a question. And no, it's not playing the victim, because I don't feel like one at all. Instead, just what happened. Ammusing if nothing else.
LOL...c'mon man. Nobody attempted to "assassinate your character" people disagree here, and what was said in this thread was pretty mild and by the way...about the "simply asking a question" stuff. There are simple questions and loaded ones, and yours was loaded. I mean, I simply asked a question too when I asked if you were objective
Tony Bobulinski was trump's guest at the debate last night. That doesn't prove anything but it does raise some questions about him and his motivations
It means Trump wanted to put him out on display. Pretty standard for political theater these days. I don't think that there's any question about him having been Hunter Biden's business partner. His motivations in coming forward are unknown at this point. Presumably, the FBI is able to filter wheat from chaff when it comes to statements like this. I see that Fox News says they've seen the emails and that there's nothing that directly implicates Joe: "Fox News has reviewed emails from Bobulinski related to the venture — and they don't show that the elder Biden had business dealings with SinoHawk Holdings, or took any payments from them or the Chinese. Still, the issue does give rise to unanswered questions about how much the former vice president knew of his son's business arrangements at the time, an issue that President Trump recently spotlighted during his campaign." I don't think that this whole thing will have any impact on the election, especially given the early voting and the lack of coverage by "mainstream media". If the Republicans hold the Senate, though look for more "investigation".
I totally tried to assassinate @TBpup's character when I posted the Uncle Joe Chinese Restaurant link. I've had lunch with him before at a chinese restaurant. There was a incident, it wasn't pretty.
Did the incident involve farm animals? Come on, I know it did. You are way more kinky than I've given you credit, Asian women and farm animals. I've a new found respect for you.
I don't know what a Porshe Boxter is. Is that some sort of flimsy underwear used to excite exotic women? I'm really hoping it is 'cause then I'll want to buy the store out of all their stock.
As someone who have had a Mazda Miata for over 20 years and have seen so many friend's Boxsters blow their engines because of the dreaded IMS bearings - this is an insult to Miatas. (To be fair, 2009 and later Boxsters are very nice cars, if you do not mind a sports car that is not that engaging at normal speeds and needs to be pushed hard to be a lot of fun in everyday use). I would not kick a Boxster Spyder dropped thanks to a generous donor from my driveway, but if I have to spend my own money on a new sports car, I would go for a ND.2 Miata over any Boxster sold. It will be much cheaper initially, much cheaper in the long run and more fun in 95% of the circumstances. On the other hand, I will not have a Porsche keyring to impress young girls (but than, I am not really interested in being a Rudy Giuliani type) or people that equate speed with fun. FWIW - Hyundai does not make a RWD sports car to the best of my knowledge. They make a very nice hot-hatch and hot-hatch coupe in the i30 / Veloster. When I am spending money on semi-exotic cranky sports cars - I go full cranky and get Alfa Romeos.
