Ima say this once. Don't @ me!

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by PCmor7, Feb 6, 2021.

  1. kjironman1

    kjironman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    19,070
    Likes Received:
    19,838
    Trophy Points:
    113
    CJ for PG I’ll pass.
    CJ for Harden straight swap sure but I ain’t giving picks as well.
    I’ll stick with CJ sorry.
     
  2. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    20,923
    Likes Received:
    32,817
    Trophy Points:
    113
    PG13 is a much better player than CJ. He's actually effective on both ends of the floor

    and LOL...Portland gives up two firsts for RoCo, but you wouldn't give up any for Harden

    I don't see what the Blazers would be risking by going for a franchise altering trade. Sure, it could backfire but so what? Blazers are on a treadmill. They are a likely early out in the playoffs, every year, and because of that have low draft picks. And they are perpetually battling the tax to hold their place in purgatory. That's not a status-quo that needs protecting
     
    TBpup, blazerkor and Chris Craig like this.
  3. BoomChakaLaka

    BoomChakaLaka Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,376
    Likes Received:
    2,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Designer / Artist
    Location:
    San Miguel de Allende, Mexico (formerly PDX)
    Ya...I’m not a blind homer I guess. Simons? Collins? So what I’m [truly] proposing is Gordon and DeRozan for CJ with DeRozan being an expiring too boot! Leaves us in a good spot this Summer. And increases our odds of making a realistic playoff move this year with CJ and Collins [truly] non-factors.
     
  4. Drttimmy

    Drttimmy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2008
    Messages:
    542
    Likes Received:
    382
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I don't see it happening, but not everything is doom and gloom. First, I don't think anyone is unbeatable which is kind of new wrinkle for the NBA. We got Dame who is a legit closer. IMO those contending Blazer teams in the late 80s and 90s didn't have anyone near as dependable as Dame to close out games or keep them afloat during rough stretches. Having a closer like Lillard is probably more a luxury than a necessity, but it's still nice to have. I also think the team is capable of more. They remind me a little of those high octane mid 80's teams that had talent, but they struggled to find the right mix of that talent until they wisely pared it down. That's kind of how I view this team. Outside of the main two guys, is there really that much difference between a starter like Covington and the 12th man Little? Nurk and Kanter? Even Collins and Giles isn't far from a wash for me. It reads as duplicate parts, so use the excess to improve where we're weak. That's basically what that late 80's squad did. Of course, different GMs.
     
    Darkwebs likes this.
  5. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    21,064
    Likes Received:
    13,607
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If PG can't win with Kawhi then what is the point of getting him? How would he be a difference-maker with us? Is Dame that much better than the former MVP? PG guy is a prick and a shit teammate. How the hell would the chemistry work between the two of them?
     
  6. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,452
    Likes Received:
    38,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    How does potentially losing CJ fot nothing leave us in a good spot? How is CJ a non-factor?
     
    Darkwebs, Tince and hoopsjock like this.
  7. BoomChakaLaka

    BoomChakaLaka Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,376
    Likes Received:
    2,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Designer / Artist
    Location:
    San Miguel de Allende, Mexico (formerly PDX)
    I’m one that believes the Dame - CJ pairing won’t win a championship. We must be bold or watch Dame’s ship sail.

    Build the right talent around Dame to have a shot (I see trading CJ the only option);

    Expendables include CJ and Nurk; This makes CJ a non-factor as it pertains to winning a title. He is however a factor in trading for new pieces!

    Nurkic is also expendable. I don’t believe Nurkic takes us to the promise land either. Hold on to your hat....because I’ll add that Kanter is a better center over Nurkic all day long. And consistently so!
     
  8. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,452
    Likes Received:
    38,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    So let's make the team worse now and potentially drastically worse next year?

    Kanter better than Nurkic?!

    Hah.
     
    Tince likes this.
  9. BoomChakaLaka

    BoomChakaLaka Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,376
    Likes Received:
    2,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Designer / Artist
    Location:
    San Miguel de Allende, Mexico (formerly PDX)
    if they don’t play...they are a non-factor!

    nothing really to “hah” over. and if your opinion is different than mine, it does not mean that it is better than mine - and you have no expertise, authority or God-given powers to always act almighty - I’m pretty certain you’re not an nba scout, etc. Just relax and have fun and stop acting like you’re BMOC around here rook.

    DeRozan = 4-time All Star, 2-time All NBA, scores more points and outrebounds CJ. He’s not a good 3-point shooter but we have Dame, Trent (and others) to take long shots. AND! He’s better than CJ right now (CJ will most likely be unavailable for the rest of the Year and is a non-factor) while DeRozan would pair nicely with Dame. Furthermore, he’s an expiring contract and we’d free up $30 million in cap space for next year if we don’t want him.

    Nurkic is basically equal to Kanter and costs much more....oh! And is a non-factor because he doesn’t play much these days. Nurkic is really no better than a good back-up center. Kanter is a great back-up center because he is much more efficient than Nurkic.

    without CJ and Nurkic, we can bring in Gordon and see if he’s a good fit and if not, trade him. And we can utilize DeRozan this year and either re-sign or part ways and free up cap space to sign Trent.

    Trent is a keeper in my opinion.
     
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2021
  10. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,326
    Likes Received:
    19,817
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Selfless Public Servant
    Location:
    South Blazerlandia
    You mean a story about a sports fan believing in his favorite team? Sounds familiar. Might make a good movie, IDK.
     
    Darkwebs, THE HCP and PCmor7 like this.
  11. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,452
    Likes Received:
    38,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Hah. Ha. Haha.
     
  12. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,452
    Likes Received:
    38,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    DeRozan is worse than CJ, and a terrible fit. Needs the ball in his hands and cant play off the ball.

    Defense is extremely important when it comes to centers, by the way.

    We dont need cap space to resign Trent.

    Let's take steps forwards instead.
     
    hoopsjock likes this.

Share This Page