Politics Dems plan bill to pack Supreme Court with four new justices

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by SlyPokerDog, Apr 14, 2021.

  1. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    116,223
    Likes Received:
    114,265
    Trophy Points:
    115
    Dems plan bill to pack Supreme Court with four new justices - erasing the GOP majority - one week after Biden announced a special commission to investigate issue 'under pressure' from left
    • House and Senate Democrats will reportedly announce the plan on Thursday
    • The plan will see four new justices added to the nine-member Supreme Court
    • The Constitution does not specify how many justices should sit on the court
    • Before 1869 Congress routinely changed the number to achieve its own goals
    • The Supreme Court now leans conservative, with Trump appointing three
    • Republicans warned during the election that Democrats would try and change it
    • Biden in 2005 said packing the court with more liberal judges was 'power grab'
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ion-pack-Supreme-Court-four-new-justices.html
     
  2. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    116,223
    Likes Received:
    114,265
    Trophy Points:
    115
    Now every administration will add justices to counteract what the previous administration did. 20 years from now SC rulings will be 542-540.
     
    Chris Craig likes this.
  3. HailBlazers

    HailBlazers RipCity

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    18,844
    Likes Received:
    15,508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PDX
    No Shame. A la Republicans.
     
    Phatguysrule and Tyrant of Ants like this.
  4. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,405
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    Not that I think many Democrats will actually back the bill (from the article, it sounds like only a few Democrats are pushing it and the headline is sensational), but this is a "no shame" move I'd actually back. If you only let the other side do whatever they want, you swiftly end up with no power at all.

    So, yeah, I agree this is kind of shitty behavior by Democrats, but after how Republicans acted with the Supreme Court, it's about the only option left.
     
    RR7, bigbailes, BonesJones and 4 others like this.
  5. crandc

    crandc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,143
    Likes Received:
    23,374
    Trophy Points:
    113
    McConnell held hundreds of federal court appointments and a Supreme Court seat for in some cases years, then packed them with hard right loyalists with minimal experience, many rated unqualified.

    There is nothing magic about nine justices, the number has increased several times and had stayed the same even though population grew.
     
    SlyPokerDog likes this.
  6. donkiez

    donkiez Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Messages:
    4,235
    Likes Received:
    3,259
    Trophy Points:
    113
    At this point you have to assume the republicans are just waiting to do the same thing as soon as they have the chance, so you have to beat them to the punch.
     
    Tyrant of Ants likes this.
  7. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    13,222
    Likes Received:
    11,304
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Can they do it and then change the rules to be more equitable permanently?

    Not that democrats necessarily would make it equitable, but assuming they wanted to, could they?
     
  8. EL PRESIDENTE

    EL PRESIDENTE Username Retired in Honor of Lanny.

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    50,346
    Likes Received:
    22,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We did nazi this coming.
     
    HailBlazers likes this.
  9. julius

    julius Global Moderator Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    42,403
    Likes Received:
    29,999
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    singer songwriter
    Location:
    Washington
    The Republicans and people who consider themselves a Republican, have no leg to stand on here.
     
  10. EL PRESIDENTE

    EL PRESIDENTE Username Retired in Honor of Lanny.

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    50,346
    Likes Received:
    22,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Overthrow the government. The original "leveling the field".
     
  11. Stevenson

    Stevenson Old School

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    Messages:
    4,032
    Likes Received:
    5,052
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Writer
    Location:
    PDX
    Well, the Dems did not invent scorched earth. Going back, we can blame Rush and Newt for that, and insofar as the Court goes, McConnell stole a court seat from the Dems when he wouldn't take up the Merrick Garland nomination. Similarly, they rammed through RBG's replacement right before the election.

    I don't like any of it, but its pretty much just desserts for the Republicans.
     
  12. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    116,223
    Likes Received:
    114,265
    Trophy Points:
    115
    There needs to be a few dogs on the SC!
     
  13. calvin natt

    calvin natt Confeve

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2017
    Messages:
    7,520
    Likes Received:
    10,457
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland Suburb
  14. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,405
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    They can do that, and I'd definitely appreciate such an approach. It's hard to figure out what a more equitable solution would be, though. I'd like something like an independent commission that selects the most qualified judges, but who's "most qualified" is very subjective and, no matter how much you try to nail it down with rules, it'll always come down to who appoints the "independent" commission--it could just be adding an additional layer with the same problems. Plus, what do you do with the existing Court?

    Rules like there always have to be at least (n/2) - 1 justices, where n is the total number of justices, of Republicans and Democrats have a few problems. One is that it enshrines the two party system--while a two party system is a current reality and an inevitability with the current way we do elections, I wouldn't want to enshrine it permanently in law (let alone specific parties). Two is that it's counter to the whole point of judges, that they're supposed to be non-partisan, they aren't supposed to be "Republican judges" and "Democratic judges." Three is that justices being appointed by the President is part of the Constitution, so how do you replace one of the justices for the "out party?" Does the vacancy just linger until their party wins the Presidency?

    Reform of the Supreme Court is probably necessary, but I have no idea how you do it.
     
    Phatguysrule likes this.
  15. Lanny

    Lanny Original Season Ticket Holder "Mr. Big Shot"

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    26,638
    Likes Received:
    16,945
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Elec. & Computer Engineer OSU Computer Science PSU
    Location:
    Lake Oswego, OR
    I can see adding two justices but I don't understand the other two. I'd be more interested in adding Washington D.C. and Puerto Rico as states.
     
    rotary111 and Tyrant of Ants like this.
  16. crandc

    crandc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,143
    Likes Received:
    23,374
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A lot of circuit courts have 20 or more judges. Maybe a formula to increase the court corresponding to population increase?

    One problem is Senate is so undemocratic. Half the population lives in 15 states and gets 30 senators. The other half, mostly whiter and less diverse, gets 70 senators. By mid century 2/3 of the population will be in those 15 states if present trends continue, so a third of the country will have 70 percent of the Senate.
     
  17. Chris Craig

    Chris Craig (Blazersland) I'm Your Huckleberry Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    53,586
    Likes Received:
    54,649
    Trophy Points:
    113
    file_20577_john-oliver-supreme-court-with-dogs-1280x720.jpg

    a05590e50af3478d9b52c10738887a32_1qXKoYV_3_original.png
     
    SlyPokerDog likes this.
  18. Chris Craig

    Chris Craig (Blazersland) I'm Your Huckleberry Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    53,586
    Likes Received:
    54,649
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't necessarily agree with the Dems doing this, but I get it
     
  19. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    32,643
    Likes Received:
    22,674
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    Get rid of lifetime appointments (or, alternately, execute a randomly chosen sitting justice every couple of years).

    barfo
     
    Tyrant of Ants likes this.
  20. Strenuus

    Strenuus Global Moderator Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    48,608
    Likes Received:
    33,632
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm just feeling like everyone does all this to just show the hypocrisy of the other side.
     

Share This Page