.....didn't Dame put up a league record 55 points in one game? Dame is not, and never has been, the problem. Terry Stott's 2005 playbook and the team's overall lack of defense, on the other hand.....
i can't handle twitter and ig today. too many dame trade comments. need to step away a bit for my sanity, but just waiting for this stotts firing news to drop so i can get about my weekend.
I stopped using Twitter years ago, and I only go on IG maybe once a month or two. My sanity greatly improved when I got off of Twitter.....that place is a cesspit.
No no no ... 2005 is just the 18th edition. The playbook is originally from 1985 and has received minor updates since.
That game they lost? That is the story of Dame. He puts up his numbers, and loses. Fire Scotts all you want, but the next coach can't teach size to Dame or CJ. Dame as our #1 guy will never get us anywhere, cause he is a one way player. He will put up 40, but give up 40. Small one way guards never win titles as the number 1 guy, never have.
Campazzo had a whopping 10 points. 5 Dame wasn't even in the game. And 3 more came on a foul by CJ shooting 3. So 2 points is getting scored on over and over? Fuck outta here with your troll shit thinking your dropping facts.
Okay...so I am really debating with a guy who takes NBA expression literally......LOL..... Score 20, gives up 20 Puts up 40, gives up 40 Drops 50, but give up 50 Gives you 30, but gives up 30 Are all expressions meaning the player has poor defense. It is a know fact Dame has zero defense. Stephen A Smith said, he told Dame and CJ this to their faces. Everyone knows Dame has no D. Which is why River and Monte Morris, whoever the F**k that guy is.......had some big nights. They are otherwise, so so players.
It does not actually mean the player will score 40 points every night, while giving up 40 points every night for 82 games...... Just making sure you understand that my friend......lol......
I don't get "wanting" a player to win a title. I want Portland to win. I'm happy when the players get paid (that's more important), but I don't care who wins what.
I think terry stawts and blazerreynolds is the same troll. 'They' say the exacts same things in the exact same manner and the exact same tone
dame’s defense was atrocious all series long. He was the start of the breakdown in our defense countless times. Just because a guard blows by him, forces Nurk to help, then passes to Jokic for a wide open layup doesn’t mean Dame played good defense. Campazzo and Rivers are bad players who arguably shouldn’t even be in the NBA and they had no time breaking down Lillard. I can’t name a single playoff series where Dame has ever showed up and even played AVERAGE defense. Ok nearly every play he just goes through the motions, watched helplessly as he gets screened and becomes totally worthless, forcing our bigs into a 2v1 situation. He makes CJ look good in comparison. are you seriously under the impression that Dame is anything but an atrocious defender?