Game Thread Game #18 - BLAZERS VS NUGGETS - NOVEMBER 23, 2021 - TUESDAY - 7:00 PM (PDT) TNT

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Chris Craig, Nov 20, 2021.

?

Who should replace Neil Olshey if he's fired?

  1. Danny Ainge

    12 vote(s)
    29.3%
  2. Brent Barry

    21 vote(s)
    51.2%
  3. Bill Branch

    2 vote(s)
    4.9%
  4. Other (Specify)

    4 vote(s)
    9.8%
  5. He shouldn't be fired

    2 vote(s)
    4.9%
  1. Cugel

    Cugel The epitome of mediocrity

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2019
    Messages:
    5,261
    Likes Received:
    5,171
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Canvas Repairman
    Let’s see how nurk does against a much more athletic Holmes tonight.
     
  2. Scalma

    Scalma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2014
    Messages:
    23,631
    Likes Received:
    34,978
    Trophy Points:
    113
  3. GDiama

    GDiama Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2016
    Messages:
    1,565
    Likes Received:
    1,398
    Trophy Points:
    113
    My takeaway from this is CJ needs to be benched for Simons.
     
    tester551 likes this.
  4. Rastapopoulos

    Rastapopoulos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    37,380
    Likes Received:
    21,977
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballin'
    Orlando's not using RoLo, and he can probably be traded in December.
    At this point we should consider waiving Zeller. Both parties can do better.
     
  5. Rastapopoulos

    Rastapopoulos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    37,380
    Likes Received:
    21,977
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballin'
    And then Little benched in favor of CJ.
     
  6. MickZagger

    MickZagger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    33,500
    Likes Received:
    11,925
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    UPS
    Location:
    V-Town Baby
    We want prime Vlade Divac. Is that too much to ask?
     
  7. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    20,710
    Likes Received:
    32,570
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm assuming that was a little bit of sarcasm, but it got me thinking:

    I'd wonder, since almost all basketball development starts early in high school, and in a lot of cases much earlier...I wonder if it's simply taken that long for all the levels below the NBA to develop three-ball offense. It wasn't going to happen overnight and I know for sure, having played in high school and citi-league, that most of those lower level coaches didn't believe in the three-point shot. They thought it was a sucker's bet

    that would have been prevailing sentiment until those 'established' coaches started consistently losing games to coaches who embraced the three-point shot

    I'm not just alluding to shot mechanics or offensive schemes. It would have to be coaches encouraging the shot...allowing their player to take those shots without guilt as long as if fit the flow of the offense

    I can actually see that taking a couple of decades to matriculate to the NBA. Of course, I could just be seeing stripes on a lion because I want to

    I tell you what though...in the NBA right now there needs to be a little more guilt about chucking up three's. It's a tsunami of crazy shot selection
    **********************************************

    which segues into something else connected to the three-ball: the vanishing big man. Since I'm in a wondering mood, would all-time great bigs like Kareem or Moses or Hakeem be #1 options today? I can see a role for a big like Bill Russell; a guy who rebounds and plays great defense while not demanding usage. Or a Dave Cowens like C hustling all the time while possessing a perimeter shooting game. I guess if Jokic is MVP then somebody like Walton would have a similar role. When I think about it, those all time greats would probably still be great in any era. But not so for the lesser C's like a Kevin Duckworth, or maybe even an Artis Gilmore. What about Sabonis?
     
  8. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    20,710
    Likes Received:
    32,570
    Trophy Points:
    113
    bobf is our resident stat guru....he's got algorithms for every hunch

    I hate him though when he proves me wrong
     
    Tince likes this.
  9. KSF-ERIC

    KSF-ERIC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2019
    Messages:
    8,659
    Likes Received:
    6,450
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We blew out 73-9 Warriors. We have better team than that team.
     
  10. bobf

    bobf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,959
    Likes Received:
    3,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I wasn't being much sarcastic. If the league assessment of a player is totally at odds with analytics I'll take analytics. Of course it won't be because the league widely uses analytics. But a certain GM cough cough has been at odds with analytics (Evan Turner, the Tolliver/Hezonja/Bazemore etc. team) and I knew those were bad moves. Of course I realize the BBall analytics tell only part of the story and are flawed. Mainly because while box scores are stable and low variance, they mostly only tell the offensive story, and plus/minus regressions while they capture pretty much the whole story are too high variance and suffer from correlation problems like above where 90% of Nurk's minutes are with Dame so the regression has trouble telling who get's what share of the plus/minus pie. And Nurks 10% without Dame is too small a sample to reliably separate them.

    As far a 3-pointers, I believe it took decades mainly because of what you said - it was viewed as "a suckers bet". I remember watching games and when a player took almost any 3-pointer early in the shot clock he "settled for the 3”. Sure the 3-point offenses have improved and more players can shoot the 3 now, but it was always are great shot.

    I agree with your point though that it can be taken two far. You can use analytics to divide shots into, at the rim, mid-range, and 3-pointers and sure enough mid-range sucks. Not by a little bit. By a lot. But that's on average. If you become Morey-obsessed with the idea you will try to shoot only 3's and layups without regard to if it's an open shot. An open 2-pointer might be like a free-throw for some players.

    I think the new foul rules are pushing 3-pointers down a bit in terms of relative efficiency, since drives are less productive, getting fouled less, which allows defenses to focus a bit more on the perimeter. So that's probably a good thing. A bit more balance restored.

    And yes, I do think those elite centers of the past could still easily flourish in today's NBA.
     
    Last edited: Nov 24, 2021
    B-Roy likes this.
  11. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    20,710
    Likes Received:
    32,570
    Trophy Points:
    113
    without Nurkic, the Blazers would likely be 30th in the NBA in defense again. Now, they are only 26th right now so that doesn't seem like much of an endorsement, but it means the Blazers would have a negative net differential without Nurk, and that would have them headed for the play-in, at best, or the lottery

    but more than the overt defensive numbers is that Nurkic is central to Portland being a really good rebounding team. Nurkic is 2nd in the NBA in defensive rebounding rate. He's led Portland to the #1 ranking in the NBA in defensive rebounding rate. I'm pretty sure that doesn't show up directly in team defensive stats, but it pretty damn important to minimize opponent possessions and keeping them from converting 2nd chance points; that's good defense

    Nurkic is 2nd in defensive rebounding, 10th in offensive rebounding, and 3rd in overall rebounding rate. Personally I think that's as important, if not more-so, than defense. So yeah, the people constantly hammering Nurk for one reason or another need to soak their heads in something cold

    ***********************************************

    Nurk's disappointment with his offensive role in understandable. His FGA's have dropped more than 4 a game from his Nurk-fever days under Stotts. And his touches have dropped by 11-12 a game. When your touches drop 20% and your shots drop 36% you're likely not going to be a happy camper.

    the problem is the addition of Powell and the 'emergence' of Simons. I've mentioned it before but those two guys added to the Dame/CJ dynamic means the 4 of them take around 67% of the shots and usage. And the three guys not named Dame are not real good at passing the ball. That issue has been worsened from Nukic's POV by the Blazers playing Dame off the ball more. If Dame doesn't have the ball, Nurkic's involvement will be less. A simple solution, at least a partial solution is to NOT play Dame off the ball when Nurkic is on the floor. Have Dame bring the ball up an initiate the offense. He'll make a point of finding Nurkic. The other three ball-handlers need to do a better job as well
     
  12. handiman

    handiman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,503
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Or he's caught onto the fact that Brown has one, and only one, overly rehearsed highlight dunk, and isn't impressed until Brown tries something new.

    The NBA 3-ball game only took a couple years to trickle down to the high school level, and many HS coaches endorse it while privately hating it. (Much like Poppovich.) It's pretty horrific when 10% shooters think they're the next Dame or Steph, but a case can be made that that's still their higher efficiency shot. But, by now, we're seeing the elite talent and teams being groomed in that system, rather than just emulating it, so I'd expect a Trae Young type, i.e. another once in a generation deep shooter, to come up every year or two.
     
  13. bobf

    bobf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,959
    Likes Received:
    3,142
    Trophy Points:
    113

    To me our defense looks significantly better this year, at least potentially so, but we haven’t ironed out all the kinks yet. Dame’s horrific start on offense also had to negatively impact our defense as the two are linked both psychologically and physically. I expect we won’t be anywhere near 26th by season end.
     
    B-Roy, tester551 and Tince like this.
  14. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    21,007
    Likes Received:
    13,564
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Or we could run like we did last night and reduce his touches even more. He was still a +18 last night so I am fine with his 6-10 shots per game. He is still valuable.

    On another note...... CJ with a + 28 last night....got to love that, right Wiz?
     
  15. Tince

    Tince Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    14,729
    Likes Received:
    14,095
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hahaha... I think it's awesome. He also posts data that doesn't support his original stance, which is the ultimate sign of maturity and open-mindedness. Very cool!
     
    bobf and B-Roy like this.
  16. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    20,710
    Likes Received:
    32,570
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I gave CJ props last night in the game thread (twice) because for the most part, he was CJ instead of MeJ. He did go MeJ in the 3rd Q and that stalled the offensive flow. But he was good in the other 3 Q's

    and by the way, I think individual game +/- numbers might be the single most useless stat around
     
    Last edited: Nov 24, 2021
    bobf likes this.
  17. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    20,710
    Likes Received:
    32,570
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ha!...as if maturity and open-mindeness have any business showing up here
     
  18. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    21,007
    Likes Received:
    13,564
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He did go MeJ in the 3rd. But it really was just the one possession where he over-dribbled that was stupid.

    I also thought his defense was noticeably "solid" last night. Chauncey is making a difference. However much like the Blazers on offense, when the other team has good ball movement there always seems to be a shooter in the corner left wide open.
     
  19. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    20,710
    Likes Received:
    32,570
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm not sure how you'd gauge it thru stats but I really wonder if Portland's biggest issue in defending three's is their lack of perimeter length. I really believe rotating to shooters with length will be more effective than with smaller, supposedly quicker players
     
    blazerkor and UKRAINEFAN like this.
  20. 1 Eye Jack

    1 Eye Jack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,902
    Likes Received:
    1,379
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Vice President for Display company
    Location:
    Albany, Oregon
    Guess I’m in minority I like Zeller. Smart player who hustles and does all the little things that wins you games. I’m fine with him as backup. We jump on and off so much with players drives me crazy. He’s a backup guy who you can count on to make all the right plays, he’s not a starter and really 8-9th man off bench. Perfect come playoff time
     

Share This Page