Article on W's Trade Scenarios

Discussion in 'Golden State Warriors' started by GSWScruff, Feb 19, 2005.

  1. GSWScruff

    GSWScruff JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    202
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Dunleavy not trade bait -- for now

    This guy seems pretty confident that Mike isn't going anywhere in the next week but that Dale is definately out. Then he proceeds to propose some trade scenarios that border on absurd. I think he overvalues Davis if he thinks we can get a young talented player for him. For Dunleavy we could get a young talented player easily, but for Davis? I don't think so. Washington is the only team that comes to mind as a possibility, but it still seems unlikely.
     
  2. GoldenstWarrior

    GoldenstWarrior JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Anything involving a player who likes to bang around in the post back to basket is welcome by me, ill take young small hands (kwame) and defintly would take nene, i say we try and get wilcox off of the clips, hes a beast
     
  3. .cabangbang

    .cabangbang BBW Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2004
    Messages:
    2,799
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I read about this on RealGM, it sounds like this guy is suggesting Fisher and DD for Damlebert and Big Dog. I'd do it. I'm just not sure Philly would. We get a good center with great potential and a guy that will do nothing, but in return, we dump Fisher and DD and get a potential star!
     
  4. GSWScruff

    GSWScruff JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    202
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Yeah I agree, it doesn't make much sense for Philly. I guess they add another shooter, but it eliminates the future of their frontcourt.

    Washington could use Davis in the playoffs and Kwame hasn't contributed much this year, so a swap of those two makes sense, but it is nearly impossible to get the salaries to match. We would have to be looking at a 3 for 1 player swap unless Etan Thomas or Larry Hughes were involved, which makes even less sense.

    Working Nene into a Dale trade could be equally hairy.

    A Clippers trade seems a bit easier since they have Kittles with a $10M deal in its last year. A Pietrus+Davis for Wilcox+Kittles deal makes some sense for both teams. As much as I would hate to let go of Pietrus, I'm sure the Clips would also hate to let go of Wilcox. However the Warriors are overloaded at the 2 and the Clippers are overloaded at the 4/5.
     
  5. .cabangbang

    .cabangbang BBW Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2004
    Messages:
    2,799
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    ^I'd hate to get rid of Pietrus as well, but I could easily see the Clips going for Pietrus. I mean look at what we would have

    PG: Speedy/ Fish/ Flores
    SG: Richardson/ Kittles/ Calbert
    SF: Dunleavy/ Kittles Zarko/ Najera
    PF: Murph/ Najera/ Zarko
    C: Wilcox/ Foyle/ Andris
     
  6. GoldenstWarrior

    GoldenstWarrior JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    I really hope we can pull something to either get wilcox or dalembert, if you have to give up pietrus for wilcox, hey im all for it, pietrus no matter how you spin it is stuck behind Jrich, and hes not really a SF hes more of a 2 (albiet with a broken jumper). The best thing to do would be to move him for a Big, wilcox is a PF, but hes a BEAST we can run small ball liek phoenix does and get some PIP, dunleavy would benifit from this for sure.
     
  7. .cabangbang

    .cabangbang BBW Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2004
    Messages:
    2,799
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    ^Good point, I defenitly think we could run on small ball, and Wilcox is a alright defender which would make two good defenders in our classic small ball lineup of Speedy, Jason, Dunleavy, Muprhy, Wilcox. We would have good defenders [​IMG]
     
  8. Custodianrules2

    Custodianrules2 Cohan + Rowell = Suck

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    11,741
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I don't think Wilcox will make up for deficiencies on defense, but he'll be an above the rim player we sorely need to make our small ball more effective. Players that big usually don't run the floor that well.
     
  9. .cabangbang

    .cabangbang BBW Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2004
    Messages:
    2,799
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    ^He could be our Amare down low. And Speedy could be Nash, and Jason could be Q-Rich that doesn't shoot threes [​IMG]
     
  10. Custodianrules2

    Custodianrules2 Cohan + Rowell = Suck

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    11,741
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting J-Rich23:</div><div class="quote_post">^He could be our Amare down low. And Speedy could be Nash, and Jason could be Q-Rich that doesn't shoot threes [​IMG]</div>
    Yeah I'm sure we'd be able to win as many regular season games as the Suns... [​IMG] Mullin had his chance to be aggressive and gamble.
     
  11. .cabangbang

    .cabangbang BBW Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2004
    Messages:
    2,799
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    ^Yeah, I'm still mad we didn't do Damp for Swift. We would be decent.....
     
  12. REREM

    REREM JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,637
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Dalembert is okay,except he is basically Foyle slightly taller and a step slower, a good shotblocker but not apt to evolve into a big offensive threat. How come Tyson Chandler is not coming up in these trade wish-lists? He seems to want to be a rebounder now,is 7+,runs and has some skills on offense. His contract should be similar to Dunleavy's,we'd do Dunleavy,2006 #1 for Chandler,and 2005 #2,maybe we toss in the future #2 from the Cliffy deal as well
     
  13. .cabangbang

    .cabangbang BBW Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2004
    Messages:
    2,799
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    ^I'd prefer Curry or Damlebert. We need a good defender down low if we are going to play small ball that can score as well. Curry is a scorer with okay defense, Damlebert can become an good scorer, and is good on D. If I were to trade anyone for Damlbert or Curry, It would be Fisher, Dunleavy is becoming better. Look at these stats

    Stat Last 5 Games Last 10 Games Last 20 Games Season
    PPG 17.4 (+4.5) 17.3 (+4.4) 14.9 (+2.0) 12.9

    Chandler might get a lot of time at center, but we need a big guy like Damlebert or Curry in the long run (well maybe not Curry. He is a free agent)
     
  14. REREM

    REREM JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,637
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I doubt we could get Curry,Dalembert or Chandler even up for Fisher,D Fish and our 2006 #1 for Curry in a sign-n-swap might work,at least if its,say,top 8 protected. I like Chandler's long term potential-which of course,only helps if we sign him. Put 15 pounds on him and he's center material for a running team,but still with the mobility for F. I have not compared stats but Chandler was a better rebounder a while back. Ideally,we get a lucky pingpong and draft Bogut, who has a more complete game and work habits than any of these 3
     
  15. Custodianrules2

    Custodianrules2 Cohan + Rowell = Suck

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    11,741
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">Golden State. Still trying to deal Dale Davis, on his last season but at $10 million. Would like to dump Derek Fisher's long-term deal, and after commitments to Jason Richardson and Troy Murphy, the Warriors aren't going to pay big money for Mike Dunleavy. He could be gone this summer.</div>
    http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sp...ack=1&cset=true
     

Share This Page