A comment regarding these political tests

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by Denny Crane, Sep 14, 2008.

  1. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,957
    Likes Received:
    10,620
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    I fail to see how one can be Libertarian and socialist leaning at the same time. They're at opposite ends of the spectrum - one empowers the individual, the other subjugates the individual to the will of the collective.
     
    MARIS61 likes this.
  2. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,243
    Likes Received:
    5,790
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    They are opposites on one part of the spectrum, but in today's vernacular are both considered socially permissive.
     
  3. DennisRodman

    DennisRodman Suspended

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2008
    Messages:
    1,266
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    lol, first question is any specific reason why you'd put this in the Blazers OT forum, instead of the Religion and Politics forum? (unless just for filler)

    But regarding the question, I think on the compass, it was Libertarian vs. Authoritarian at North vs. South, and Left vs. Right.

    Libertarianism vs. Authoritarianism would be solely the the level of involvment of the government.

    While the Left vs. Right would be the issues that each of the parties represent outside of the level of government. (Economy, Iraq, Abortion, Gay marriage, whatever)

    So back to the question. It is basically a graph of level of government involvment on the horizontal axis, and Left (all issues except level of gov't involvement) vs. Right (all issues except level of gov't involvement)

    That is my understanding I guess.

    However yes, socialism and libertarianism cannot agree with themselves. But in reality socialism has never worked the way it was supposed to, and there has never been a pure capitalism with no government intervention in all markets.
     
  4. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,243
    Likes Received:
    5,790
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    We Blazer fans asked to create an OT subforum due to the one at BBF.com getting shut down.
     
  5. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,957
    Likes Received:
    10,620
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Socialism turns into something authoritarian. Hence my point is still the same... You can't be Socialist and Libertarian at the same time.

    OK, OK, there is a weasily way that some left-wingers claim to be libertarian.... That somehow by empowering people through the authority of the state, they are liberated. That's half a joke and half serious.
     
  6. 44Thrilla

    44Thrilla cuatro cuatro

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2004
    Messages:
    14,113
    Likes Received:
    215
    Trophy Points:
    63
    it is possible to have socialist views on certain subjects and libertarian views on others. I don't think you can define one person's political views with a single term.
     
  7. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,957
    Likes Received:
    10,620
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    That would be a flaw with these kinds of tests, eh?

    It gets interesting when you think about why they use 2 dimensions. Why not 3? Why is it left/right and up/down when a circle or sphere gives you more degrees of freedom?

    I think the tests are basically rigged to allow the impossible for a reason.
     
    MARIS61 likes this.
  8. DennisRodman

    DennisRodman Suspended

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2008
    Messages:
    1,266
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well, an authortarian state coming into power can empower the people if the masses (proletariat) are being impoverished by the bourguoise. The kind of situation where an overhaul (revolution) would be needed, and then at a later point then the government can take a lesser role.
     
  9. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,957
    Likes Received:
    10,620
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Days of Terror. French Revolution.

    Look it up :)
     
  10. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,461
    Likes Received:
    2,460
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Definitions are important, right? Socialism and communism... different theoretically? Yes. In practice? I don't think so.

    Socialism is a government imposition of a certain (new) order on things. Communism is the lifting of the government's hand entirely, after society and its comrades have accepted the new order.

    Libertarian-Socialist could be, at some level, Communist.

    Alternatively, Socialist could be on the economic axis, at the opposite end of Capitalist/Free Market. Combining no government interference with that kind of anti-free market stance would... hmm... be anarchy? Or, as DC pondered, incompatible. :)

    Ed O.
     
  11. ucatchtrout

    ucatchtrout Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,460
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Maybe there is no definition....only confusion.... for me anyway.

    What was once republican is no longer republican. What was once democratic is no longer democratic.

    I used to think I knew what these parties stood for, but I don't anymore. It appears to be more of a free for all. Each party would have you believe they are very different from the other, but I'm not so certain. I think maybe Robert Kennedy Jr had it right when he said "the only difference between the democrats and the republicans is the democrats are only 97% crooked"
     

Share This Page