Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by SlyPokerDog, Jan 3, 2020.
Actually it's a summary of an article from The Dailymail that was reposted on MSN.
daily mail a right wing conspiracy site?
The US edition of the Daily Mail does have a strong conservative slant.
That's interesting, but I was talking about "main groups" by size, not percentage within the group. I'm sure you can find a very specific group, like military wives or engineers in rural areas, that have even higher hesitancy rates.
Who is Travis Tritt?
The protestors causing problems in Oregon City are Republicans... Gladstone and Salem as well...
Right. Seems to me the anti-vax crowds know a lot of people that died from the vaccines. I wouldn't give a shit about all their bullshit if not for the fact that it's led to a lot of people's death.
I would be more interested in pre and post vaccine.
Oh BTW burden of proof, in science and in law, is on person making claim.
This discussion is making me wonder if the cat box needs cleaning. Something productive.
your post eluded to mariss not being valid and the cdc is. So prove it. Stand by your words and take on that burden of proof you just outlined as being your responsibility for disclaiming mariss post as not truth compared to the cdc?
are you telling me instead of doing that i need to prove fauci has ties to Moderna????
Yeah. Pissin in the wind isn't productive, no doubt.
I didn't see where you claimed that, but if you did, you probably can't prove it, since it isn't true.
Probably why I've never heard of him.
typical Barfo…. How about addressing the meat of the post instead of only what you care to?
might make having an actual trusting conversation a bit more possible.
Until then not sure why you even quote me other than to actively try to create drama.
Your antics are very old my man…
Typical OB, deflecting instead of addressing any part of the post.
I'm not trying to create drama. I'm trying to make sure lies don't get propagated. I'm not accusing you of doing that - I literally do not know why you mentioned Fauci and Moderna, but I wanted to point out it isn't true. That was the point of my post.
Not everything is about you. I'm interested in what you mentioned, not your emotional reaction to it (or lack thereof, if you prefer).
i dont trust you being honest with your claimed “interests”.
I mentioned it because the other person eluded to a claim and didnt offer proof, but turned and said i should? So i just asked some stupid question not even thinking about the question, mocking the stupid post stating one needs to provide proof on the heels of a loose accusation without providing proof.
But instead of addressing that hypocrisy, you come at me…
i never made any claim, so your statement trying to not let lies propagate is just bullshit fluff.. typical bullshit fluff…
im sorryy tou cant handle the fact that you Re incapable of having an honest convsrsation so i dont care whether you think im serious or not or telling the truth a okt bow i feel or not?
you do realize you created this behavior towards you right?
The moment you said you will only address what you care to?
Ive already told you you lost me there. Not really concerned if you think im honest, real, trolling or what….because i cant trust you to be honest and upfront about things myself. So don't spin this crap as its not all about me. Its all about you dude. You.
I wouldnt have a wall up on you if you hadnt first put one up on me…
When you start addressing the tough questions along with the easy ones, honestly, ill change my tune. Until then i know discussing anything with you is futile, so i don't care to address the meat of your post. You will just spin, like you just tried to do…
And @barfo i have no ill will, no issues with you. Just so you know. This isn't emotions, itsjust firmly explaining my stance. I just know not to take you seriously based on your own admission.
It is what it is. I just find it annoying you keep trying when you admittedly dont converse openly and honestly.
it sure reads like you have a issue with him.
i thought that might be the case, which is why i clarified.
Just tired of the one sided convos and gotcha quotes trying to be passed off as, “ attempting to have a conversation” when he self admittedly said he wont.
Separate names with a comma.