Zombie Dopes and babies

You're right, it was a good read.

You were also right to forewarn Trump followers, "DO NOT READ !".........it did not paint a flattering picture of their Fuhrer.

 

Anyone surprised by any of this has been sipping the MAGA koolaid for far too long. Trump is the classic "emperor has no clothes" dim bulb who only wants sycophant ass-kissers surrounding him praising the drivel that comes out of his mouth.

 

They're dopes and babies alright, and definitely losers.

Trump was elected to drain the swamp of Deep State career warmakers, and that's exactly what he's doing and that's exactly who these losers are.

He saw right through the dog and pony show that Obama fell for, and threw the treasonous morons out

We're tired of the Deep State and their endless wars for profit.

 

FAKE NEWS ! ^^^

 

Draining the swamp of
Rep. Chris Collins;
Paul Manafort;
Rick Gates;
Michael Flynn;
Rep. Duncan Hunter;
George Nader;
Imaaz Zuberi;
George Papadopoulos;
Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman;
and soon to be Rudy Giuliani.
Good job, Trump.

 

not wanting to jump threads, but this is exactly what im referencing in the other thread.
Instead of creating a thread discussing some of the details you lined out in the other thread about how dems are doing good things, you start a trump bash thread with a link to some article portraying him in a bad light( i didn't click the link)

This is the stuff i roll my eyes at anymore. And the truly serious stuff i might miss because I m going to lump This in with all the other trump bashing threads and move on, with ignorance.

why? Because this is just more childish, finger pointing crap, aim at making trump look bad instead of coming up or posting actual, positive ideas and thoughts on how to improve... well anything, really....

I used to read some of them and agree with some of thesw links, but over time its become trivial compared to agenda driven topical debates/ discussions.

start a thread about what the dems have planned to improve our lives over the next four years and ill read it through and through.
Until them be aware, post like this do little to won over the undecideds compared to posting things im saying i would read.

your thoughts Re noble, your actions do not do them justice.

again if you want trump out, stop bitching aBout him and start voicing better ideas and agendas?

 

Trump doesn't need anyone's help in looking bad...he's already checked all the boxes on that matter.

 

There is much to bash Trump about. He adds to that list by the minute every day. I guess you can't bash him for that red button on his desk. No, not the one ordering a nuclear strike, but rather the one the rings his butler saying "I want a diet coke and I want it now".

 

Ahhh nice try and twisting my words around.

nooooo that isn't what i said.
I used to read things, but as i did i realized many of the links, topics of argument were superficial fluff based on opinions from hurt emotions and had no actual ramifications on his politics.
So many of the points of argument have had little to do with actual politics and governmental operations but are about his personality, that i gave up.

So to try to make my point clear for you, the percentage of links and articles of relevant content has been proven to be of such a low number, I've decided its not worth my time to sift through aNy of it, if the dems cant get their shit together to determine what is an actual relevant topic of discussion vs some bullshit opinion based fluff on his personality traits.

Dems, in trying to make every meme in the world about his hair or his face or whatever, turned me off soooo much that dems hurt your own message when you actually have one of relevance.

when dems get frustrated and assume we are ignoring certain things, well you have no one to blame but yourselves for pushing such a high percent of nonsense stories.

now, unfortunately, because the dems made a pile of straw with a few valid needles hidden inside, its now up to the dems to weed through all the bullshit straw and pull to the top the actual stories of contention that have relevance to our actual economic/ domestic aNd foreign status.


Its up to the party to sell their agenda. Not for me to weed through all the bullshit pushed out there to find what i might like.

yall did it to yourselves and them bitch about the apathy you get in return.

sorry. Not swayed. Don't get mad at the listener when they get tired of the story. Change the story!!!!

 

im. very much undecided.

Im no fan of trump and i think he is a terrible embassador because of many of his antics. With that said i like what ive seen in our economy and how he is trying to get us out of foriegn conflicts.

im very much swayable. Im saying the dems are putting together a very poor sales pitch to me. And from what i can tell, many others.

Dont forget my original post said i see Lot of this from both sides.

 

Ill add id rTher vote dem. But i need to see a better econimic plan than what i currntly see.

i haven't seen it.
Im nit for paying for universal health care to further enable laziness, etc.

The few true valid stances i have seen from the dems borderline a socialist movement i want nothing to do with.

come up with a better plan and ill absolutely vote for it. Until then ill vote for the party that caters to my ideology regardless if the personality of the representative is abrasive or not.

 

Many of your posts say otherwise and you might be fooling yourself, but others are not so easily fooled by your claim of "neutrality". Actions speak louder than words and your actions are saying different things. Good luck with that.

 

Care to quote and dissect or explain your stance considering I hardly post in political threads and these last 24 hours have had more posts from me about politics than in the last 4-8 months.

So if you are forming an opinion, maybe ask and clarify rather than just claim you know? Or maybe quote and explain why such and such says i'm not undecided?
There aren't actions on a website.. Only word,s so not sure how you are comparing actions as speaking louder than words? Not really following you on this....