<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (wolverine30 @ Jul 1 2007, 09:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Looks like a JoeMagoo sig. Pretty good. Not a fan of the text.</div>no it doesn't...
I dont think hes saying he copied his idea or nething.. I think he just means the huge render in the back and the small render in the front
I'm not copying anyone... but if it looks like someone else's, so be it.I just put it there 'cause it looked good.thanks for the comments though, was going for something without very much scattered sh*t
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (KCX @ Jul 1 2007, 10:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I dont think hes saying he copied his idea or nething.. I think he just means the huge render in the back and the small render in the front</div>That is true, but a lot of designers do that including me sometimes.
It looks pretty good - I don't really love the text, but it isn't horrible. One thing I'm really not feeling is the blurred render. I'm sorry, I just don't like the feel of it at all. It looks pretty bad IMO, but the render effects and the rest of the BG really make up for it. Overall, good job.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MaRdYC26 @ Jul 5 2007, 11:12 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>It looks pretty good - I don't really love the text, but it isn't horrible. One thing I'm really not feeling is the blurred render. I'm sorry, I just don't like the feel of it at all. It looks pretty bad IMO, but the render effects and the rest of the BG really make up for it. Overall, good job.</div>I agree. The blurred render ruins the sig IMO. It takes all the flow away. Either sharpen the blurred render or switch it out with another stock.
