Great find. To no ones surprise, I have not seen that reported in the mainstream media.... That was as direct and to the point as it needs to be. The president needs to be asked the same.
I'll be (dis)credited for being the poster who started this thread. Sorry, BP, but thanks for the link!
Just another crybaby waah-waahing about what Susan Price said on TV. (If I got the name wrong, it's because I don't give a shit and neither does anyone else.) "Do YOU know what was on Spongebob Squarecakes yesterday?" No, I don't watch that show. Nobody cares what was on TV.
That you don't care about the ineptitude and deceit that goes with this event and this administration is appalling to witness in a citizen. But I expect it does speak to your character.
When a US ambassador is murdered, like it or not, there has to be investigations as to why and how and what could have been done to prevent it. At every turn new and credible evidence crops up about cover up and ineptitude from the Obama administration. To me, as a US citizen, the answers are vitally important.
One each, but no one told a cock n bull story about some stupid video being the whole problem. The poor dummy that made that video is in jail, the only one involved the whole thing that is in jail and he had nothing to do with killing the ambassador, except in Obama's story, Hillary's story and Sue Susan Rice's bull crap tale. The guy actually has a right to say what ever the hell he might want about Muhammad and the Nation that has that right in it's Constitution, jailed him for it. Well I guess Hillary followed through, she told Charles Woods, father of one of the Seals that they would get him for this. That is appalling, disgusting.
He wasn't an Ambassador. He wasn't even a CIA Station Chief. He was about 39, had a staff of about 2 people, and operated secretly in a secret building. Because he died, they honor him by calling him Ambassador. The local CIA had about 10 Americans and told him what to do. His job was to build a Rolodex of local contacts for future, real diplomats. You're the last one to talk, Killer.
Oh, you mean no one had a made up controversy? Good thing that there wasn't some document that showed that there was a fear that 9/11 was going to happen. There are clouds outside, go yell at them.
Multiple investigations of 9/11. Unlike Obama, Bush appointed 5 democrats and 5 republicans to a commission with the power to investigate. Obama administration did not and obstructs congress in its constitutional oversight duties. Aside from the 9/11 commission, there was the FBI investigation, assessment of why the structures fell by engineers, etc.
The fake "investigations" were widely panned as limited sweeps-under-the-carpet, with Democrats demanding a broader effort, and Republicans covering up. Results of a real investigation would be...only weeks after Pearl Harbor Day, FDR fired some of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Then my father dealt with one general in a business capacity. The general, now a civilian, was about 10 levels below where he had been. The point is, they weren't provided with soft landings. Those at fault fell hard.
Well, that makes almost 10 times. Ridiculing everyone from the LSD thread is why no one believed you when you lied that you yourself had used it.