phins offensive scheme

Discussion in 'AFC East' started by Thoth, Sep 7, 2008.

  1. Thoth

    Thoth Sisyphus in training

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2003
    Messages:
    7,218
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    the 801
    After watching the game today, here IMO is how Miami should line up & how frequently.

    45% of the time use; Ricky, Ronnie, Ginn, any 2 TE's. This obviously is the base personnel grouping.

    15% use Ricky, Ginn, Camarillo, Wilford, & S Ryan This spreads the field and utilizes Ryan who is the better blocker.

    20% use Ricky, Ronnie (as a H-back and the primary motion man), Ted G, Wilford, & Fasano.

    The remainder would be Ricky, Ginn & Bess, as well as Fasano & Martin which would get some speed and flexibility on the field
     
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2008
  2. Vintage

    Vintage Defeating Communism...

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,822
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Has Fasano learned to block yet?

    I saw he had a pretty good day receiving.... nice to hear about that.
     
  3. Thoth

    Thoth Sisyphus in training

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2003
    Messages:
    7,218
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    the 801
    In Dallas, I thought Witten was the receiving TE and Fasano was the blocker. Fasano did okay blocking.

    Miami signed Sean Ryan (who was acquired by Parcells @ some point in the past) away from the jest to be the blocking TE.

    As I mentioned elsewhere, Even David Martin had a good day. It stunned me when they cut former Charger Justin Pelle (sp?) who I understood was the most well rounded of the TE's.
     
  4. Vintage

    Vintage Defeating Communism...

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,822
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38

    We originally did draft Fasano to be the blocking TE. The problem was, he was constantly missing blocks/missing assignments... that we ended up using Witten as the blocking TE too. That's why he was traded.

    Fasano is a pretty good receiving TE; but we already have that...

    The thing I was upset with was after trading Fasano, we drafted another TE in round 2. Again. Hopefully Bennett ends up being better than Fasano did for us.

    Fasano will be a nice option for Pennington... that, I have no doubt.
     

Share This Page