Politics Supreme Court rules in redistricting case: Illegal immigrants, other non-citizens can be counted

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by Denny Crane, Apr 4, 2016.

  1. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,959
    Likes Received:
    10,631
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
  2. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,378
    Likes Received:
    27,199
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Washington Times LOL. What a conservative rag. No, Republicans just want to gerrymander shit even further then what it is now.

    If you can't vote because you have a felony (more right wing bull) does that mean that you get taxation without representation?

    The entire Supreme Court smack the shit out of those conservative and that's what they get. We can't win elections so let's just cheat... More Heritage foundation, Paul Weyrich bullshit.

     
  3. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,378
    Likes Received:
    27,199
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Punk ass website is giving my phone pop ups...
     
  4. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,959
    Likes Received:
    10,631
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    What are you griping about? The decision was UNANIMOUS. All 8 Justices voted for it. The source article offered no opinion.

    You have your head in the sand. Knee jerk reaction to good news because it's the Times?

    LOL
     
  5. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,959
    Likes Received:
    10,631
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    A unanimous Supreme Court ruled Monday that illegal immigrants and other non-citizens can be counted when states draw their legislative districts, shooting down a challenge by Texas residents who said their own voting power was being diluted.

    The ruling does not grant non-citizens power to vote, but says the principle of “one person, one vote” doesn’t require localities to only count those who are actually eligible to vote.

    Justice Ruth Baden Ginsburg, writing for the court, said even though only eligible voters are supposed to cast ballots, elected officials represent all people within their districts, and it is that act of representation, not the election itself, that the boundaries are drawn to.

    “As the Framers of the Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment comprehended, representatives serve all residents, not just those eligible or registered to vote,” she wrote. “Nonvoters have an important stake in many policy debates — children, their parents, even their grandparents, for example, have a stake in a strong public-education system — and in receiving constituent services, such as help navigating public-benefits bureaucracies.”

    Texas residents had challenged the way districts were drawn in their state, saying that because they ended up in districts with more eligible voters, their vote counted less than someone in another district.

    Because of illegal immigrants, other non-citizens and children under 18 years of age, state legislative districts in Texas can vary by as much as 40 percent.

    The process of dividing up districts is known as apportionment.

    At the federal level, congressional districts have been drawn based on total population under the strictures of the Fourteenth Amendment.

    All 50 states have followed the same rules, though the Constitution wasn’t explicit on the matter.
     

Share This Page