The "Start Rudy" Bandwagon

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by ABM, Oct 11, 2008.

  1. ABM

    ABM Happily Married In Music City, USA!

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    31,865
    Likes Received:
    5,783
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Commercial Real Estate
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    Upon reading THIS piece, I'm officially on it...

     
  2. dreamcloud

    dreamcloud Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    345
    Likes Received:
    286
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I'm not, I think he's better in a Ginobili type role..he can bring huge spurts of energy and runs off the bench IMO.. Plus I'm not in favor of putting Roy at SF.
     
  3. ABM

    ABM Happily Married In Music City, USA!

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    31,865
    Likes Received:
    5,783
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Commercial Real Estate
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    I hear ya.

    To, me, having Oden essentially packing the middle [in a zone configuration] would make that all possible, though.
     
  4. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    90,282
    Likes Received:
    52,342
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I would rather see a Rudy/Roy backcourt for a few games. See how that goes.
     
  5. ehizzy3

    ehizzy3 RIP mgb

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    9,974
    Likes Received:
    6,109
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Hillsboro/Bogotá
    oden will already be fighting with foul trouble..rudy starting wont help any
     
  6. 44Thrilla

    44Thrilla cuatro cuatro

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2004
    Messages:
    14,113
    Likes Received:
    215
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Paul Pierce has always been a true 3. I don't know what the hell the author is talking about.
     
  7. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR

    I was thinking the same thing. Ray Allen took over for Tony Allen or whoever else Boston was going to start at SG. Roy is the SG right now; Pierce did not have to move positions to make room for Allen or Garnett.
     
  8. #1_War_Poet_ForLife

    #1_War_Poet_ForLife The Baker of Cakes

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,176
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Agreed. What a terrible anecdote.
     
  9. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    They may want to delete that post at Blazersedge. It is an embarrassment.

    Or stop posting drunk. Whatever...
     
  10. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    32,727
    Likes Received:
    22,785
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    What fun is it to have a blog if you can't post drunk?

    barfo
     
  11. ABM

    ABM Happily Married In Music City, USA!

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    31,865
    Likes Received:
    5,783
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Commercial Real Estate
    Location:
    Nashville, TN

    So, then, Pierce was their 3 and Wally World played 2?
     
  12. ABM

    ABM Happily Married In Music City, USA!

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    31,865
    Likes Received:
    5,783
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Commercial Real Estate
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    Thought THIS was interesting:

     
  13. ucatchtrout

    ucatchtrout Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,460
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Maybe he got the idea from KP.... who has already said he reads Blazers Edge and sometimes posts there.
     
  14. ucatchtrout

    ucatchtrout Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,460
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    48
    News this morning is that Frye is practicing and may be ready by opening day. Over the summer he said he was given the green light to work on three point shooting and that Nate and he had talked about him playin SF.

    What do you guys think about starting Frye at SF?
     
  15. 44Thrilla

    44Thrilla cuatro cuatro

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2004
    Messages:
    14,113
    Likes Received:
    215
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Pierce was listed as 2, but defended 3s. Before the Ricky Davis/Wally trade, Pierce was listed at 3 and defended the 3.
     
  16. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,405
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    If Roy can defend small forwards reasonably well, in the long-term, moving Roy to small forward would be great. It would instantly solve the small forward problem and the off-guard log-jam problem.

    I'd love to see an eventual lineup of:

    PG: Jerryd Bayless
    SG: Rudy Fernandez
    SF: Brandon Roy
    PF: LaMarcus Aldridge
    C: Greg Oden

    Of course, this all hinges on Roy being just as valuable at small forward as he has been so far at shooting guard. That remains to be seen. Also, if this did end up being the eventual starting unit, that actually gives Outlaw a solid role on the team long-term: sixth man instant offense. If Fernandez and Bayless aren't coming off the bench, Outlaw can be the one who can come off the bench and fill up the basket.
     
  17. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR

    Good question. I did my part last night, minus the whole "having my blog" part.
     
  18. alex42083

    alex42083 Thanks Brandon

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    7,789
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Writing about sports
    Location:
    Canby, Wilsonville, Portland
    Guess it all depends on the matchup. If Odom is starting for LA, then I wouldn't mind Frye starting if the reports are true that he's in really good shape -- enough to play SF. Frye seemed kind of slow-ish last year to guard SFs.

    If we're playing Boston, Frye would no way be able to keep up with Pierce, so you've got to go with Blake-Rudy-Roy.
    And with the article today about Outlaw not thinking he can be aggressive in the first unit, its time to send him back to the bench.
     

Share This Page