Agreed; let it be known that around here, the Warriors forum is full of amazing and detailed discussion. I'm not even a GS fan but I respect that forum.
Another thing to fuel the competitive juices. Keep in mind the issue of tagging: http://sportstwo.com/forums/announcement.php?f=123 If you follow the link to the site's tag cloud (a grouping of the most common tags, where bigger font size means most popular tags), you'll see that "New Jersey Nets" is by far the most popular tag, meaning there are a ton of threads about the Nets and tagged as such. I encourage you to tag your threads with all relevant keywords for the thread. Maybe we can make "Portland Trailblazers" the most popular tag on the site, illustrating more Portland Trailblazer discussion than anything else. Plus, the advantage of tagging is that people will better find threads of interest to them, leading to more discussion. Here's the direct link to S2's tag cloud: http://sportstwo.com/forums/tags.php
thank you sir, i always knew i wasnt the only one who enjoyed the refined taste on my ever-adapting palate. maybe someday all who dare may rejoice in the furious mouth orgy that is so aptly defined simply as "pudding". i like turtles too
I plan to tag threads, but tagging works best when it's not just one or two people's opinions on what best describes the threads.
Hmm. I guess. That's why everyone is able to use them. And why people are encouraged to use them correctly. I had trouble at first, deciding whether to do "nets, new jersey" or "new jersey nets", and then whether or not to do players' full names or just last names. I went the full "new jersey nets" and the full names of players, btw.
Update: we've passed Sacramento, Washington, and Memphis since I started this thread 2 days ago. barfo
This is a competition? What do you get for winning? What does this have to do with sports? just kidding
