Do you agree with this quote?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Fez Hammersticks, Oct 27, 2008.

  1. Fez Hammersticks

    Fez Hammersticks スーパーバッド Zero Cool

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    29,150
    Likes Received:
    9,829
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Phone Psychic
    Location:
    The Deep State, US and A.
    From Dwight Jaynes (via Sports Sunday)

    "I'll take talent over experience every time"

    He thinks that if we make the playoffs we can make some noise. When games get tight I think we have a coach who'll instruct his young players what to do. So in short, I agree with Dwight.
     
  2. THE HCP

    THE HCP NorthEastPortland'sFinest

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    71,241
    Likes Received:
    59,899
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    N.E.P.
    You can gain experience, you can't gain talent. You're born with it!
     
  3. DaRizzle

    DaRizzle BLAKER

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    9,631
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Torrance, CA
    No I dont agree with that statement. With experience comes knowing how to close games and deal with adversity

    Its a give and take and he is trying to make it an absolute
     
  4. bodyman5001

    bodyman5001 Genius

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Messages:
    2,147
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    auto collision technician
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    I absolutely agree 100 percent with that quote.

    Here is a weird analogy that is impossible but should prove my point.

    If someone were to build a time machine and take today's Michael Jordan back in time to 1991, would 40 something year old Michael Jordan be better at basketball than 1991 Michael Jordan?


    No fucking way.

    In my line of work I know people that have more experience than I have years as an adult. They are still hacks, they have just been exposed to this trade enough to know that they suck at it. With that experience they have learned how to get by, they will never be great.
     
  5. SheedSoNasty

    SheedSoNasty Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,979
    Likes Received:
    5,827
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But isn't it much more difficult to gain talent than it is to gain experience?
     
  6. DaRizzle

    DaRizzle BLAKER

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    9,631
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Torrance, CA
    Well how about you dont use the extremes...How about a 3rd year MJ compared to an 8th year MJ...thats a more relevant argument
     
  7. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR

    Hah. I remember when I was in my early 20s and thought the same thing about those that I worked with, but the weird thing is they got a lot smarter as time went on. So you'll be either the upwardly mobile guy that everyone talks about behind your back, or you'll be the know-it-all who really doesn't know-it-all.

    The fact that you post on a message board tells me you are the latter, which isn't a bad thing, and you'll be in the group you loathe in another ten years or so.
     
  8. DaRizzle

    DaRizzle BLAKER

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    9,631
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Torrance, CA
    You gain talent with experience whether it physical or mental. Obviously everyone gets experience but not everybody uses that to their advantage
     
  9. rocketeer

    rocketeer Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2003
    Messages:
    3,250
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    38
    yes i absolutely agree with the statement.

    especially when people start talking about "playoff experience". the real significance of playoff experience is that it comes as a byproduct of being a good team.
     
  10. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    When the margin between victory and defeat at such a high level of athletics is so small, and the talent gap between most players so miniscule, experience can be a huge benefit. Dwight presents false choice here; it not talent or experience, most elite teams have talent and experience.

    On the bright side we'll have some more experience at season's end.
     
  11. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I got to watch the 1990's Blazers team against the Spurs on TV last week...

    One Rod Strickland boner basically caused the start of our 3-year run...if he holds onto the ball and they score there, the Spurs win. The Spurs, with a 2nd-year Admiral, a young Sean Elliott, older Terry Cummings, etc. would have gone to the WCF.

    You could make the argument Strickland's "inexperience" cost them. But I tend to think that "experience" can be overrated. The greats get great when they get great, and in games with fewer players on the field/court at the same time superior talent means more. Gretzky, Tiger, Russell, etc. just started winning. MJ may have, if his Bulls teams weren't so horrible or the Celtics and Pistons (each of whom had their own talent stores) weren't so great.

    I think our team falls in the "Gretzky and Tiger" category, rather than the "early MJ" category.
     
  12. bodyman5001

    bodyman5001 Genius

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Messages:
    2,147
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    auto collision technician
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    It really bothers me when people assume they know something they obviously don't know. Your post is a good example of this. Assuming that there are these two specific groups of people in a bodyshop? funny.....You last worked in one when?

    I was talking about people who have been fixing CARS LIKE YOURS for 30 years and couldn't weld bubblegum to more bubblegum. I am talking about people who take a torch to high strength steels when they have no idea of the makeup of the steel involved, and are too ignorant to know that they just reduced steel that is made specifically for a certain purpose, to the type of steel they have EXPERIENCE with. Which is mild steel and most definitely not the best choice for the safety of your vehicle.

    Just so you know, in an accident you might die if your vehicle was repaired improperly. The bad thing is that 99.99 percent of the time nobody will know that you might have lived if it had been done right, because your car is supposed to be smashed when you wreck it. They don't send out someone like the FAA to see why YOU died, regular accidents aren't that important.

    It may be a little known fact to the real world but unless we are talking a simple bumper job on a new car we are ACTUALLY talking about something that can put your life in danger if you don't have it fixed properly.

    I am 34 and I am the guy the boss gives the jobs to when he wants to make sure they are done right.


    I am the guy he sends to class to make sure that someone in the shop knows about current vehicles and proper repair procedures.


    I guess I was a bit naive about posting on a message board. I thought it was something I do for fun. My bad.

    The good part is that I can now assume that most other people are like you said, the know it all who doesn't really know it all. Kinda funny how neither one of us must know it all.
     
  13. bodyman5001

    bodyman5001 Genius

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Messages:
    2,147
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    auto collision technician
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    That is an absolutely irrelevant argument. So far from being relevant as to be almost worthless.

    I think it is pretty safe to say that Dwight would rather have an equally talented player with MORE experience. Why wouldn't he?

    Try this example of extremes

    You choose one of these for your next (or first ever) date.

    A: Hot 20 year old girl who only had one boyfriend and never went all the way

    or

    B: Wore out 65 year old women who has been married 8 times and has six grandkids.

    You take the experienced one if you want (shudders at the thought)
     
  14. handiman

    handiman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,881
    Likes Received:
    3,916
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Meaningless quote... You don't get experience without talent. You have to be talented to stick around long enough to gain experience, at least the type that counts for anything.
     
  15. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    The quote doesn't really have enough detail to agree with or disagree with.

    I would rather have a more talented team overall, but in a five or seven game series, it's ENTIRELY possible that a more experienced team will beat a more talented one.

    Of course, if the gap is too extreme in favor of talent (or the experience gap is too narrow), talent should overcome.

    The reason I prefer talent to experience is because I'm not just concerned with a single playoff series or a single year of playoffs... if we have talent, we will get experience.

    Ed O.
     
  16. rocketeer

    rocketeer Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2003
    Messages:
    3,250
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    38
    in a 5 or 7 game series, the most talented team almost always wins. it just happens that they are also usually more experienced because their talent level has continuously gotten them that far.
     
  17. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    I disagree.

    I haven't done a systematic study of NBA champions or general playoff success, but older teams, from my experience as a fan, seem to do better. Talented teams rarely emerge from the lottery and make a splash deep in the playoffs. Teams like the Bulls and the Lakers in the 90's stub their toes a time or two before finally breaking through. I think that few would argue, taking a more recent example, that the Spurs were more talented than the Hornets last year, but the Spurs beat them.

    When a team like that breaks through it's not because they got more talent, necessarily... the same team can be more successful simply because they know how to use their existing talent more effectively. They learn that through experience.

    Ed O.
     
  18. KingSpeed

    KingSpeed Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    63,192
    Likes Received:
    22,385
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    actor
    Location:
    New York
    But 1991 Michael Jordan had a TON of experience. Lost to the Pistons a couple times in the playoffs. Had been in the league for 7 years.
     
  19. JAFO

    JAFO Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    6
    I'll take experienced and talented over talented with no experience any day.

    JAFO
     
  20. RW#30

    RW#30 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2008
    Messages:
    331
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    18

    Bird and Magic was old and Stern needed a new marketing cow. Experience had nothing to do with it. Like previously stated you born with talent, you either have it or not.
    Players like Kurt Rambis stayed in the league because of his smarts and determination.The Lakers didn't win because of him.Others like Elton Brand, Danny Manning (after horrible injuries) could stay because of talent.
     

Share This Page