Championship: Huevonkiller vs. DynastYWarrioR6

Here's the TOPG in their best statistical seasons....

Chris Paul - 2.5 TOPG
Vince Carter - 2.5 TOPG
Paul Pierce - 3.0 TOPG
McHale - 2.5 TOPG
Robinson - 3.0 TOPG

Dwight - 3.0 TOPG
Amare - 2.5 TOPG
Melo - 3.5 TOPG
Deron - 3.0 TOPG
Arenas - 3.5 TOPG

Like I said 10 TO's is generous, so bless me with your idealogy of how you'll split up 80 shots.....

 

I find it cute that you ignore, what is it, what would be a double or triple overtime game today in the NBA taking into account pace? Yeah and your guy Monroe didn't have the most attractive True Shooting %. Paul was the best point guard in the league last year, I wonder if Monroe could ever say that during his tenure.

Actually I know who they are quite well, I deconstructed them before. Even Amare is comparable to Reed as a rebounder btw, he has reached the 17.8 TRB% plateau before. I think Aguirre is quite nice though, props to you on that at least. My Bigs are simply out of this world, not your fault. :]

I've addressed this, Jordan and the Bulls never faced a team like mine and I disagree with your drafting process actually. Drafting people that didn't necessarily translate as well in the NBA is dangerous to me. My peak years are never put into question, some people simply prefer a player who accumulates garbage career totals.

Don't act like all the Legends are as good as Kobe.

K-Mart was always highly touted for his defense since day 1, and with my amazing depth at PF he doesn't even need to see the light of day. I'm very surprised you'd personally attack him like that, you obviously have no knowledge of his lateral quickness.

 

Chris Paul is better than both Nash and Iverson. I'm "pissed" (not really, don't care about the award) because I feel Kobe got robbed. There's no shame in losing to Kobe.

 

You realize that all of that was addressed to Mint, so don't act like I attacked you homie.

 

And now that I read that.....


Garbage career totals? Wow.

 

I guess Assist turnover ratio doesn't count, only turnovers?

Huh? Nice job selecting one of the stats that wasn't taken into account back in the day. And tell me how these TO's are uncommon for the stars in the league.

 

And sorry for clumping legends with other legends. I fucked up major on that one.

 

Hm, use common sense. I'm talking about people like Celtic Fan who love Iverson's career totals over someone like Paul.

 

The way you are attacking Monroe btw can be said about the players I listed that have the same issue

HIBACHI!!!!

 

K no prob.

 

The back-up who sees what, 12 minutes a game max as a SG?

 

CF is a smart man. Iverson was a stud back in the day, and he still is, but a very declined him (age kills).

 

He was never better than Paul as a PG.

 

And you are assuming that just cause Monroe is starting means that he'll play majority of the game? You know what assumptions do?

Monroe is a great sparkplug to start games with, a stabilizer like Wilkens is where crunchtime comes into play.

Think of Monroe with that starting lineup like Blitzkrieg.

 

Where did I say he was?

 

Do what you want with your backcourt, I'm good over here. 8d

 

Well the fact that certain people disagree troubles me. :]

 

Strawman....you wanted me to educate you on how they force stuff, so I took the TO's from their career years. That's also the problem, you have all stars that will just be a lot of 1-on-1 play rather than great ball movement. Since you don't have ball movement, you team wouldn't be as great as you're playing it off to be. It'd be full of TO's and frustration of people not getting their shots and a lot of complaining. So please lecture me with the 80 shot breakdown that you're avoiding and tell me why you think it would work

 

Um, I never said AI was a better PG. And people tend to disagree with each other, what you say isn't the law.

 

Iverson is a SG, he's not a PG