If you guys were to trade VC... (3 way POR/PHX)

Discussion in 'Brooklyn Nets' started by shamelessblazer, Nov 29, 2008.

  1. shamelessblazer

    shamelessblazer Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2008
    Messages:
    629
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    18
    doesn't Phoenix make sense as a likely destination? Shaq has been on record as saying he wants to play with VC more than anyone else before (as a guy he could get over the top) and he's been playing really well for you guys but you're not going anywhere this season right? VC is your only long-term contract (other than Harris). Wouldn't moving him now (while value is up and injury free) and getting a better draft pick be a better value long-term (with almost no salary after next season)?

    In Phoenix stuff is a disaster, if they're going inside out they need a slasher bad, and VC is the guy, Nash is relegated to duties he can do, but doesn't excel at, is no driver, and has no one to feed on the perimeter right now (with no perimeter scorers around). Grabbing VC could make a lot of sense for them (if they get desperate) and Kerr would rather move Nash and do his own thing than go down with a sinking ship I would imagine.

    As a Portland fan I love the thought of a couple year rental of Nash. He would fit well up here, have a lot of guys to feed on pick n rolls, hit open shots, not be relied upon to do everything (extending his career) and get to push the tempo for us selectively (similiar to his Dallas days with Finley and Dirk being Roy and Aldridge). I know he doesn't fit "long-term" but I think the playoff experience the guys get with him, the way he rewards them with easy buckets, and the pure consolidation would help our development even after he was gone.

    What do you guys think of a deal like this:

    NJ sends: VC
    NJ receives: Bayless, Outlaw, Bell

    PHX sends: Nash, Bell
    PHX receives: VC, Blake

    POR sends: Blake, Bayless, Outlaw
    POR receives: Nash

    It would save you a lot of money and net you two decent prospects. To save even more money (and get less in potential players) you could go with this:

    NJ sends: VC, Simmons
    NJ receives: Outlaw, Bell, Raef

    PHX sends: Nash, Bell
    PHX receives: VC, Blake, Bayless

    POR sends: Blake, Bayless, Outlaw, Raef
    POR receives: Nash, Simmons


    What do you think of the concept in general (sending out VC for savings and prospects), do you think VC will be a Net by the end of the season, would he fit into a half-court Phoenix system, and does the offer seem realistic?
     
  2. xflavioVC15x

    xflavioVC15x Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    927
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Lodi NJ
    No way those are happening
     
  3. #1_War_Poet_ForLife

    #1_War_Poet_ForLife The Baker of Cakes

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,176
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I think a pick or two would be needed. Vince's value right now is pretty high, he's healthy, and he doesn't want to force his way out like he did in Toronto. Unfortunately for the Nets, he has a reputation of dogging it and not being mentally tough, which might bring down his value.

    Bayless+Batum+Outlaw+ Bell + a future first rounder from the Suns.
     
  4. #1_War_Poet_ForLife

    #1_War_Poet_ForLife The Baker of Cakes

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,176
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
  5. shamelessblazer

    shamelessblazer Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2008
    Messages:
    629
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    18
    no chance in hell, that's basically 4 first rounders for him (not to mention a ton of cap relief), I wouldn't trade Batum for VC straight up right now.
     
  6. #1_War_Poet_ForLife

    #1_War_Poet_ForLife The Baker of Cakes

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,176
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    The Grizz got 5 first rounders and Marc Gasol for Pau. :)
     
    Last edited: Nov 29, 2008
  7. xflavioVC15x

    xflavioVC15x Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    927
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Lodi NJ
    :crazy::crazy::crazy:
     
  8. DevinNets34

    DevinNets34 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    448
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Devin Harris and Vince Carter are untouchable now.
     
  9. NJNetz

    NJNetz BBW Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    14,413
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48

    No one is truly untouchable. Say Lebron or Wade were up for grabs; those two would be shipped faster than you can say "No".
     
  10. shamelessblazer

    shamelessblazer Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2008
    Messages:
    629
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    18
    if you have a generational gap between your two "stars" on a .500 team, one of them is always "touchable" give me a break.
     
  11. FOMW

    FOMW Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2007
    Messages:
    898
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    18
    No, at least not for the kind of players you're proposing. For the same reason you like the idea of Nash on the Blazers, Nets brass like the idea of Vince with this team, helping the youngsters get into the playoffs, get seasoning there early, and test their wings to see just how high they can fly after a season together. Unless they are out of the playoff picture in February, he will not be traded this year. If they perform well enough this season, I wouldn't expect him to be traded until February 2010, at the earliest. Unless you are bringing back immense, top 5 pick caliber talent in a young player, there's no sense in trading him. He's 31 and still playing very high caliber basketball, and we have no idea yet how good this team will be in April.
     
  12. DevinNets34

    DevinNets34 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    448
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18

    I'd say it would be better and better, cuz we have so many young players on the team, and as long as they develop with the time going by, then we probably would be better.
     
  13. JFizzleRaider

    JFizzleRaider Yeast Lords Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    13,452
    Likes Received:
    6,320
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Who Knows?
    As a Blazer fan I don't want Nash right now
     
  14. MaxaMillion711

    MaxaMillion711 ...?

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2004
    Messages:
    814
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Occupation:
    Mixer
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    how about

    outlaw/raef for vince

    blake, roy, vince, aldrige, oden = KILLER
     
  15. DevinNets34

    DevinNets34 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    448
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    That team has no heart, NJ is better.
     
  16. #1_War_Poet_ForLife

    #1_War_Poet_ForLife The Baker of Cakes

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,176
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Yeah, but, then you take Batum out of the lineup. I wouldn't give Batum up straight up for Carter.
     
  17. Netsfan99

    Netsfan99 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2008
    Messages:
    130
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Vince and Nets are doing fine right now.. why are you guys even discussing about trades?
     
  18. JFizzleRaider

    JFizzleRaider Yeast Lords Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    13,452
    Likes Received:
    6,320
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Who Knows?
    :NOTMARIS:
     
  19. NJNetz

    NJNetz BBW Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    14,413
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Wtf? Are you serious?
     
  20. #1_War_Poet_ForLife

    #1_War_Poet_ForLife The Baker of Cakes

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,176
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page