IMO, Salmons Equals Ben Is Gone

Discussion in 'Chicago Bulls' started by Rellogg, Feb 18, 2009.

  1. MikeDC

    MikeDC Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,643
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Professor
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    Well, we've freed up pretty significant room for next year today, so perhaps Ben's not gone after all.
     
  2. Денг Гордон

    Денг Гордон Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,039
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbia, MO
    Do you have a link to Jerome James' contract coming off for sure?
     
  3. MikeDC

    MikeDC Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,643
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Professor
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    No, it's not a 100% sure thing. Just a reasonable supposition based on his injury, fatness, likelihood of ever playing again, and the league rules.
     
  4. Денг Гордон

    Денг Гордон Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,039
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbia, MO
    I saw an estimate, that if the Bulls can get Jerome James medically retired, they can give Gordon $67 million over 6 years. That's a more than fair deal for Ben.
     
  5. bullshooter

    bullshooter Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Messages:
    2,175
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    That'd be a big waste of money...

    (Sorry, it's like a reflex or something.:dunno:)
     
  6. Денг Гордон

    Денг Гордон Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,039
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbia, MO
    It sounds like Paxson's plan is to re-sign Gordon, trade Hinrich for dogfood, make Salmons the backup at both guard spots, and then swing a trade for Amare/Bosh using the young bigs and his plethora of expiring contracts.
     
  7. MikeDC

    MikeDC Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,643
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Professor
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    Just double-posting this to offer up a mea culpa on Jerome James.
    http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#Q53
    So yeah, that sucks. That means he won't come off our cap. Although I'd imagine if the Bulls really wanted to they could pawn him to a team under the cap. Since insurance is going to supposedly pay 80% of his $6.6M contract, the receiving team would be liable for only $1.32M, which we could reimburse with cash (and add another million and a half or so for their trouble.
     
  8. bullshooter

    bullshooter Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Messages:
    2,175
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Funny, I didn't get that sense at all from his comments. I think it'll come down to how Salmons plays and what kind of deal BG holds out for. If BG wants more than 8-9 million and to start, I think Pax will try and sign and trade him. If he signs a 3 year $24 mil type of deal and is at least amenable to the idea of being a sixth man then they move Hinrich for whatever they can get assuming Salmons can fit in. But Pax certainly didn't sound to me like he was planning on tying up all of his cap space for BG with his comments about flexibility. And you just don't give away a player of Hinrich's caliber and value.
     
  9. Rellogg

    Rellogg Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2009
    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Occupation:
    Bulls Fan
    Location:
    Chicago
    That's pretty much the dumbest thing I've read all day. Thanks for that. Sounds like reality has set in that Ben Gordon is being pushed out of town, Kirk has more value in the league and your pissed. Tough shit. :tsktsk:
     
  10. MikeDC

    MikeDC Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,643
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Professor
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    So bye Ben.

    That leaves the following possible uses for James:

    * Scrub our cap by trading him to a team under the cap. I'd imagine if the Bulls really wanted to they could pawn him to a team under the cap. Since insurance is going to supposedly pay 80% of his $6.6M contract, the receiving team would be liable for only $1.32M, which we could reimburse with cash (and add another million and a half or so for their trouble).

    * As a trade chip. Like a mini Raef LaFrentz, we could include James in a trade to another team, who wouldn't have to pay most of his salary. Could help in round II of the Amare/Bosh talks. One can dream, right?

    * As a multifaceted way for the Bulls to spend less. He's on the books for $6.6M, meaning they can't sign anyone else, but he actually only costs the Bulls $1.3M. Hurray for operating income.
     
  11. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Or yet another waste of salary cap space, but this time a guy who won't complain about the lack of PT.
     
  12. MikeDC

    MikeDC Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,643
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Professor
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    The problem with this line of thinking is that it's not enough just to trade Kirk (or anyone else) in the summer. Because unless you're trading with one of the teams with lots of cap space, you have to take back nearly as much salary as you give out, so it doesn't really do much to facilitate re-signing Gordon.

    It can be done, but it limits the market quite a bit.

    Also, the problem isn't limited to signing Ben, it's also true of signing and trading Ben. Because again, the Bulls won't have the flexibility to take back a player of comparable salary to whatever Ben gets, because that player would also put them over the LT.
     
  13. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    According to your salary page, the Bulls have $9.5M in cap space (minus Gordon), which could be used to sign him.

    The trade exception is going to expire, I believe.
     
  14. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    ^^^ and a bunch of expiring contracts to deal:
    Miller @ $12.5M
    James @ $6.6M
    Thomas @ $6.5M

    Enough to facilitate a pretty big S&T with BYC involved.
     
  15. bullshooter

    bullshooter Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Messages:
    2,175
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I think that LT cap number is a little high. It's probably going to be closer to $70mil I think.
     
  16. Денг Гордон

    Денг Гордон Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,039
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbia, MO
    I would imagine that Gordon is in the team's future plans given how Paxson called him valuable, while not even mentioning Hinrich once during the entire press conference, saying that another trade may be needed to re-sign Ben. (That would be Kirk).

    Don't be shocked if we do a draft day trade for a marquee player. If Phoenix misses the playoffs, I think the chances of a Bulls/Suns draft day trade is big. Especially with Jerome James offering some money relief.
     
  17. bullshooter

    bullshooter Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Messages:
    2,175
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Realistically, BG's not going to get more than about $10 mil/per. And that deal could start as low as $8-9 in the first year depending on how it's structured. So the bulls could almost take back somebody on an MLE, right, or is it a base year thing?

    And MN could still take Hinrich for draft picks this summer. Or they could give away some cheaper players.
     
  18. Денг Гордон

    Денг Гордон Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,039
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbia, MO
    OKC is back in the market for Ben, and the Pistons might make a run at him too, as well as Boozer.

    I think Ben is the Bulls for the taking, as long as they're willing to go into the luxury tax. With the economy the way it is, I don't see Ben getting grossly overpaid by a team for like $15 million a year. But I could see him easily getting $8-9 million per a year from Detroit or OKC. And Bulls can easily give him something like $60 million over 6 years, which is a solid deal for the Bulls.

    We need to keep Gordon. He's a great three point shooter and he's fourth in the NBA in fastbreak scoring this year. If we are building around Derrick Rose, I think one of the top fastbreak players in the league is someone you want to keep around.
     
  19. bullshooter

    bullshooter Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Messages:
    2,175
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You're really grasping at straws. Can you imagine any scenario where Pax would call BG anything but "valuable" that doesn't involve a bottle of tequila or a gun pointed at his temple?
     
  20. MikeDC

    MikeDC Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,643
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Professor
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    Yeah, the $71M is based on historic averages, but all signs are pointing it being lower at this point. I'll update the numbers when I have some sort of reasonable basis to make an estimate, but at this point I'd just be substituting one guess for another. :sigh:

    I read (no link, unfortunately) the league was estimating $68.4M due to the fast and steep drop in revenues they're facing.

    So if that's the case, the Bulls would have only $3.9M in which to fill 4 roster spots. And two of those will be first rounders on some sort of rookie scale deal. So my guess is that, like this year, they'll be extremely close to the LT threshold just trying to fill out their roster.
     

Share This Page