Cramer was an easy target, and he bent over for JS when he went on his show to "settle" this dispute. The guy showed no backbone.
Lucretius is pretty cool. I'm reading On the Nature of Things for an Epicureanism seminar. Seems like your prof likes the philosophy of language. I find that stuff real dull.
Finally decided to fill out my bracket for Bas' pick'em. Even though I didn't pay enough attention to college ball this year, I can't wait for the tournament to start.
We are going to have like a choice of 4 out of 8 questions to do. I assume it will be Descartes/Lucretius heavy since we studied them the most, so hopefully I can write at least 3 on those two. Then there is surely to be a comparison on Fodor/Searle vs. Clark's views on mind, so that could be my fourth one. He seems like the type of teacher, that if you show good analytical thinking in your thinking, that you will get an A. And he seems like unless you just give no effort at all, you will at least get a B. That type. I got an A on my first paper, so I'm not worried. I got good notes on Lucretius, and Descartes, so I will be really good on those two.
Simply promoting people to get more active in their respective areas, you might be a GM if you didn't fuck off to BBW or whatever mediocre site you went to
