You know, I hope this author's predictions are proven to be wrong....but with the current government agenda and now probably making decisions at GM as to what cars to produce, and with the new fuel mileage standards, it is a cause for concern.... http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/06/01/ferrara_gm_bankruptcy/ Does the government really believe they can strong arm people into buying the kinds of cars they want them to drive? I certainly can't imagine many people (myself included) being ok with this govenrment telling me what I can\cannot drive\buy....and frankly it seems pretty UN-American to me, if that does indeed become the case... Is this the next step?
There's never been much public outrage over past CAFE standards. It's too gradual, bureaucratic and boring. Try to charge an extra tax, though, and people's blood pressure goes through the roof. A new tax is fast and obvious. I'd rather they go the tax route, though. It's honest, and it still gives people the option to buy what they want if they are willing to pay for it. Put in a gas tax floor--no matter what the Saudis, Canadians and Americans want to charge for gas, at the pump it'll never be below $3.50 (or whatever). Uncle Sam pockets whatever the difference is. You raise that floor price a percent or so higher than inflation, and over time we'll move to other fuels. *shrug* If this thread has much debate you can pretty much script out how it'll go.
I could be way off, but I thought one of the reasons that GM was in the position its in is that it's invested billions of R&D into electric and other "Green" cars for almost two decades, without a drop of revenue coming in from them. Are they going to bring in better engineers? Or update their supply chain?
Actually I don't see where this guys article has any teeth, it is all conjecture. Secondly, many of the things that he is complaining about, are things that needed to change anyhow, because they aren't working out. Like he is complaining about how americans will no longer be able to drive big gas hungry cars anymore. Well no shit sherlock? Like that hasn't been coming a long time.
I saw the camaro at a casino over the weekend...it looks pretty sweet. but yeah, that's a two year old car they're not pushing at all...people would buy...there's a market.....they aren't going to out japanese the japanese, they need to stick to what they do best. Muscle Cars and trucks. not pseudo lawn mowers. people will buy trucks because they are a great utility.
GM should have acquired this company: http://www.teslamotors.com/ And used its manufacturing strength to mass produce the cars. In the quantities built now, the cars are $100K. In mass quantities, maybe $40K or even less. Throw in a govt. subsidy to get the cost down even further, and these things would fly off the lots as fast as they could be made. The lower end model is already below $50K. 0-60 in 3.9 seconds or 5.6 seconds... who needs a muscle car? Too late, Daimler already bought a stake in the company.
Ouch. Nader doesn't like what Obama's doing. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=prnw.20090601.DC25338&show_article=1 Nader Statement On GM Bankruptcy WASHINGTON, June 1 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Consumer advocate Ralph Nader today issued the following statement on GM's bankruptcy filing: Today's bankruptcy declaration in federal court by General Motors is an avoidable, crude weapon of mass devastation for workers, dealers, auto suppliers, small businesses and their depleted communities. For GM's voiceless owners -- the common shareholders -- it is a wipeout. The proximate cause of the bankruptcy was supposed to be the inability of GM and the government's auto task force to reach an accommodation with GM's bondholders. But late last week, the bondholder problem was moving toward rapid resolution, and was clearly resolvable. Why then are GM and its multibillion government financier proceeding with bankruptcy? The bankruptcy and the GM restructuring plan are the product of a secretive, unaccountable, Wall Street-minded government task force that assumed power because of a Congressional abdication of historic magnitude. By all rights, the restructuring plan should have been submitted to Congress for deliberative review and decision. There is little doubt that GM's chronic mismanagement and the deep recession require restructuring and scaling back the auto giant. But the bankruptcy and restructuring plan appear poised to do so in ways that will needlessly harm the stakeholders meant to be helped by Washington's rescue of GM? Many, many jobs will be lost that could be preserved. There is reason to question whether too many plants and brands are being closed -- a matter that should have been taken up in Congress. Just the closing of hundreds of (GM and Chrysler) dealerships will cost more than 100,000 jobs. These sacrificed jobs will fray communities and impose enormous expenses on government entities that will have to provide unemployment and social relief, while suffering lost tax revenues. The unionized workforce will see the wage and benefit structure slashed -- even though auto manufacturer wages make up less than 10 percent of the cost of a car -- so that new jobs at GM will no longer be a ticket to the middle class. This will drag down the wage structure of the entire auto industry -- exactly the wrong direction for the country. America's manufacturing base will be further eroded, as GM pursues its Grand China Strategy -- increasing manufacturing outside of the United States, and increasingly from China, for import back into the United States. Unanswered questions persist about how GM's valuable operations in China, and unrepatriated profits, will be treated in bankruptcy, or excluded from bankruptcy. Victims of defective GM products may find themselves with no legal avenue to pursue justice. In the Chrysler bankruptcy, with complete disregard for the real human lives involved, the Obama task force and auto company have maneuvered effectively to extinguish the product liability claims of victims of defective cars. In a worst case scenario for the GM bankruptcy -- involving an extended court proceeding or severe impairment of consumer confidence in the GM brand -- all of these problems will be magnified. Again, given the path to resolution with the bondholders, this is an avoidable gamble. The GM/task force bankruptcy plans appear geared to saving the General Motors entity -- but at a harsh and often avoidable cost to workers, communities, suppliers, consumers, dealers, and the nation's manufacturing capacity. It will also prove to be a complex political nightmare for President Obama. With the company entering bankruptcy, the next challenge will be to ensure that the government exercises its ownership rights to undo and mitigate, to the extent possible, these damages. Among other measures, this should involve revisiting the serious drag-down, concessionary wage terms imposed on the United Auto Workers; demanding a moratorium on GM's outsourcing of production of cars for sale in the United States; and establishing successorship liability for the new GM, so that victims of dangerous and defective GM cars can have their day in court. SOURCE Ralph Nader, Consumer Advocate
Ugh. Michael Moore. http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php?id=248 Monday, June 1st, 2009 Goodbye, GM ...by Michael Moore I write this on the morning of the end of the once-mighty General Motors. By high noon, the President of the United States will have made it official: General Motors, as we know it, has been totaled. As I sit here in GM's birthplace, Flint, Michigan, I am surrounded by friends and family who are filled with anxiety about what will happen to them and to the town. Forty percent of the homes and businesses in the city have been abandoned. Imagine what it would be like if you lived in a city where almost every other house is empty. What would be your state of mind? It is with sad irony that the company which invented "planned obsolescence" -- the decision to build cars that would fall apart after a few years so that the customer would then have to buy a new one -- has now made itself obsolete. It refused to build automobiles that the public wanted, cars that got great gas mileage, were as safe as they could be, and were exceedingly comfortable to drive. Oh -- and that wouldn't start falling apart after two years. GM stubbornly fought environmental and safety regulations. Its executives arrogantly ignored the "inferior" Japanese and German cars, cars which would become the gold standard for automobile buyers. And it was hell-bent on punishing its unionized workforce, lopping off thousands of workers for no good reason other than to "improve" the short-term bottom line of the corporation. Beginning in the 1980s, when GM was posting record profits, it moved countless jobs to Mexico and elsewhere, thus destroying the lives of tens of thousands of hard-working Americans. The glaring stupidity of this policy was that, when they eliminated the income of so many middle class families, who did they think was going to be able to afford to buy their cars? History will record this blunder in the same way it now writes about the French building the Maginot Line or how the Romans cluelessly poisoned their own water system with lethal lead in its pipes. So here we are at the deathbed of General Motors. The company's body not yet cold, and I find myself filled with -- dare I say it -- joy. It is not the joy of revenge against a corporation that ruined my hometown and brought misery, divorce, alcoholism, homelessness, physical and mental debilitation, and drug addiction to the people I grew up with. Nor do I, obviously, claim any joy in knowing that 21,000 more GM workers will be told that they, too, are without a job. But you and I and the rest of America now own a car company! I know, I know -- who on earth wants to run a car company? Who among us wants $50 billion of our tax dollars thrown down the rat hole of still trying to save GM? Let's be clear about this: The only way to save GM is to kill GM. Saving our precious industrial infrastructure, though, is another matter and must be a top priority. If we allow the shutting down and tearing down of our auto plants, we will sorely wish we still had them when we realize that those factories could have built the alternative energy systems we now desperately need. And when we realize that the best way to transport ourselves is on light rail and bullet trains and cleaner buses, how will we do this if we've allowed our industrial capacity and its skilled workforce to disappear? Thus, as GM is "reorganized" by the federal government and the bankruptcy court, here is the plan I am asking President Obama to implement for the good of the workers, the GM communities, and the nation as a whole. Twenty years ago when I made "Roger & Me," I tried to warn people about what was ahead for General Motors. Had the power structure and the punditocracy listened, maybe much of this could have been avoided. Based on my track record, I request an honest and sincere consideration of the following suggestions: 1. Just as President Roosevelt did after the attack on Pearl Harbor, the President must tell the nation that we are at war and we must immediately convert our auto factories to factories that build mass transit vehicles and alternative energy devices. Within months in Flint in 1942, GM halted all car production and immediately used the assembly lines to build planes, tanks and machine guns. The conversion took no time at all. Everyone pitched in. The fascists were defeated. We are now in a different kind of war -- a war that we have conducted against the ecosystem and has been conducted by our very own corporate leaders. This current war has two fronts. One is headquartered in Detroit. The products built in the factories of GM, Ford and Chrysler are some of the greatest weapons of mass destruction responsible for global warming and the melting of our polar icecaps. The things we call "cars" may have been fun to drive, but they are like a million daggers into the heart of Mother Nature. To continue to build them would only lead to the ruin of our species and much of the planet. The other front in this war is being waged by the oil companies against you and me. They are committed to fleecing us whenever they can, and they have been reckless stewards of the finite amount of oil that is located under the surface of the earth. They know they are sucking it bone dry. And like the lumber tycoons of the early 20th century who didn't give a damn about future generations as they tore down every forest they could get their hands on, these oil barons are not telling the public what they know to be true -- that there are only a few more decades of useable oil on this planet. And as the end days of oil approach us, get ready for some very desperate people willing to kill and be killed just to get their hands on a gallon can of gasoline. President Obama, now that he has taken control of GM, needs to convert the factories to new and needed uses immediately. 2. Don't put another $30 billion into the coffers of GM to build cars. Instead, use that money to keep the current workforce -- and most of those who have been laid off -- employed so that they can build the new modes of 21st century transportation. Let them start the conversion work now. 3. Announce that we will have bullet trains criss-crossing this country in the next five years. Japan is celebrating the 45th anniversary of its first bullet train this year. Now they have dozens of them. Average speed: 165 mph. Average time a train is late: under 30 seconds. They have had these high speed trains for nearly five decades -- and we don't even have one! The fact that the technology already exists for us to go from New York to L.A. in 17 hours by train, and that we haven't used it, is criminal. Let's hire the unemployed to build the new high speed lines all over the country. Chicago to Detroit in less than two hours. Miami to DC in under 7 hours. Denver to Dallas in five and a half. This can be done and done now. 4. Initiate a program to put light rail mass transit lines in all our large and medium-sized cities. Build those trains in the GM factories. And hire local people everywhere to install and run this system. 5. For people in rural areas not served by the train lines, have the GM plants produce energy efficient clean buses. 6. For the time being, have some factories build hybrid or all-electric cars (and batteries). It will take a few years for people to get used to the new ways to transport ourselves, so if we're going to have automobiles, let's have kinder, gentler ones. We can be building these next month (do not believe anyone who tells you it will take years to retool the factories -- that simply isn't true). 7. Transform some of the empty GM factories to facilities that build windmills, solar panels and other means of alternate forms of energy. We need tens of millions of solar panels right now. And there is an eager and skilled workforce who can build them. 8. Provide tax incentives for those who travel by hybrid car or bus or train. Also, credits for those who convert their home to alternative energy. 9. To help pay for this, impose a two-dollar tax on every gallon of gasoline. This will get people to switch to more energy saving cars or to use the new rail lines and rail cars the former autoworkers have built for them. Well, that's a start. Please, please, please don't save GM so that a smaller version of it will simply do nothing more than build Chevys or Cadillacs. This is not a long-term solution. Don't throw bad money into a company whose tailpipe is malfunctioning, causing a strange odor to fill the car. 100 years ago this year, the founders of General Motors convinced the world to give up their horses and saddles and buggy whips to try a new form of transportation. Now it is time for us to say goodbye to the internal combustion engine. It seemed to serve us well for so long. We enjoyed the car hops at the A&W. We made out in the front -- and the back -- seat. We watched movies on large outdoor screens, went to the races at NASCAR tracks across the country, and saw the Pacific Ocean for the first time through the window down Hwy. 1. And now it's over. It's a new day and a new century. The President -- and the UAW -- must seize this moment and create a big batch of lemonade from this very sour and sad lemon. Yesterday, the last surviving person from the Titanic disaster passed away. She escaped certain death that night and went on to live another 97 years. So can we survive our own Titanic in all the Flint Michigans of this country. 60% of GM is ours. I think we can do a better job. Yours, Michael Moore MMFlint@aol.com MichaelMoore.com
So you get to lose your freedom so that the Indians and Chinese can destroy your kids' planet? Awfully kind of you. I choose not to.
You know who owns a large majority of oil companies? Low-risk mutual funds. Old people's retirement funds. Not some Evil Bill Gates sitting in a mansion on an island volcano somewhere. Let's bankrupt the oil industry also! Michael Moore says so! We have a low percentage of people graduating from friggin' high school right now, much less college. Who are the smart people Moore's going to get to design, build and run his cross-country railroads? How much will they be subsidized? Why a $2 tax? Why not 5? Why not 75 cents? Please tell me Moore's done the trade study on that. I'm reading a pretty good book right now: Physics for Future Presidents. I highly recommend it. It debunks from a scientific perspective some things that people uneducated in science don't understand (like, say, the nuclear fuel discussion we had on here a while back), but listen to when some government official (politically appointed) says so. I'm getting tired of media being so partisan and Joe and Josephine American being so stupid that things like our "energy crisis" and "bailout" debt are being allowed to happen without even a vote from Congress. You know what I'd LOVE to see? If we as citizens bail out GM for 30B, I want the government to come to us and say "each of the 300M Americans chip in 100 bucks. You get 1/300M share of GM's loan payback. If GM buys back its government ownership someday, great--my wife and I get our 200 bucks back (hopefully we get interest or something). I'm tired of trillions of our money being spent with little openness, lots of partisan talking-over, and all the while no one's making the decision-makers answer the tough question. Can someone tell me where I voted, or my representative voted, or me as a GM shareholder voted for this to happen?
Yeah. I wanted to buy one, but the only way to get it serviced in Portland is to put it on a truck and ship it down to California. Given the expected reliability of a brand-new car from a brand-new manufacturer using uncommon automotive technology, it was in the end a little bit past my risk tolerance. barfo
What does it matter who owns them? If grandma and grandpa are smuggling heroin, should we look the other way? The Japanese, obviously. They know railroading. To the extent this is an executive branch action rather than a legislative, and to the extent you didn't vote for Obama, then I guess you didn't vote for it. It's kind of like how I didn't vote to go to war in Iraq, I suppose. barfo