Bayless a goner?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by SodaPopinski, Jul 24, 2009.

  1. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,337
    Likes Received:
    25,362
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    I don't see why Bayless shouldn't just ride the pines for a couple of years as the 3rd string PG, but if Jaynes is right (how often does that happen?) that Bayless mentally can't handle that, then I guess we should ship him out. Of course, he isn't going to be a starter anyplace else either, so if he can't handle the bench he shoulda stayed in school.

    barfo
     
  2. Idog1976

    Idog1976 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,730
    Likes Received:
    3,927
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    I look to the stars.
    Location:
    P-Town baby!
    Yeah I'm not totally ready to sign off on Bayless yet. People already think I'm crazy on this forum so I will just say it, I would rather trade Rudy and Blake then Bayless. This is because Bayless is a combo guard and can back up Miller and Roy. Rudy + Blake + Outlaw should be able to net someone nice and if a trade includes a backup PF or PF/C we can include Joel in our trade asset collection.

    I love Rudy I really do and if I was 100% certain he would be ok with 20 minutes a game for his career or that he could morph into a PG or SF then I wouldn't trade him for virtually anyone. However, the evidence abounds that he is unwilling to be a backup (Hedo-gate and his comments at the time) and will lower his trade value by going to the media about it down the road. I also don't see him ever being a PG or bulking up enough to be a SF.

    Joel would be redundant if we got a good PF/C or even just a really good PF as LMA is a PF/C. He has some value as he is a great mid-level C on a reasonable contract, but too expensive to be a 12 minute a game guy. I personally hope Joel only plays 12 or less minutes a game because that means Oden is playing for 36+.

    So I don't INSIST on trading Joel/Rudy. They just seem to be logical choices to trade as they actually have a requirement of a trade chip...VALUE!
     
  3. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Call it Channing Frye Syndrome; getting little to no PT while you are playing out your rookie scale deal is a one way ticket to lost millions. Jerryd should want out of here for the sake of his professional career.
     
  4. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,337
    Likes Received:
    25,362
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    Yep, no doubt he should want to go somewhere he could play more. That doesn't mean we have to let him go, however. He's under contract.

    barfo
     
  5. oldmangrouch

    oldmangrouch persona non grata

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    12,403
    Likes Received:
    6,325
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of course, he could also get more minutes by proving he is better than Blake and Rudy. Just saying....
     
  6. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,337
    Likes Received:
    25,362
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    It's an idea. Hope it occurs to him.

    barfo
     
  7. Haakzilla

    Haakzilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,456
    Likes Received:
    7,471
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    SEOWebDesignLLC.com
    Location:
    Central Oregon
    ...trade for Conley, anyone :dunno:
     

Share This Page