Is Blakey Playing Pure Shooting Guard?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by ABM, Nov 11, 2009.

  1. ABM

    ABM Happily Married In Music City, USA!

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    31,865
    Likes Received:
    5,785
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Commercial Real Estate
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    From what I've seen lately (one of the games since the newest lineup), it appears that, either, Andre's leading the team.......or Roy is when Andre's out.

    Steve seems to be reduced to a spot-up shooter.

    Am I missing something here?
     
  2. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,325
    Likes Received:
    43,687
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, you are. Everyone knows that Roy is a shooting guard and that it is blasphemy to suggest that he is something else. Blake is the (very) small forward. In fact, I believe they will be putting VSF next to his name in the official box score tonight...
     
  3. ABM

    ABM Happily Married In Music City, USA!

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    31,865
    Likes Received:
    5,785
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Commercial Real Estate
    Location:
    Nashville, TN

    Thanks for that insight. I just knew I could count on you to set me straight. ;)
     
  4. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,325
    Likes Received:
    43,687
    Trophy Points:
    113
    For a more serious response, I think you're reading it perfectly, and I'm hoping (as are many others) that this is the precursor to him being reduced to a reserve role, and then (hopefully, if Bayless continues to progress) reduced to third-string. It makes sense, since Blake doesn't really do anything with the ball, so why have it in his hands at all unless he's shooting a three?
     
  5. ABM

    ABM Happily Married In Music City, USA!

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    31,865
    Likes Received:
    5,785
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Commercial Real Estate
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    That, sir, is spot-on, IMO.
     
  6. hasoos

    hasoos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,418
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Here are the unfortunate facts. In order to get Nate to stop playing some players, you literally have to trade them off the team. Certain players always endear themselves to Nate, and because of this, and him playing favorites, he will never stop playing Blake, and probably never stop starting him. Even when you think you have got over a hurdle, Nate will pull Blake back out and put him back in the starting lineup, then we will have to listen to Mike and Mike suck Steve Blake off for a whole half of a basketball game. They are always quick to praise him, but never rip on him for shit he does wrong. They never talk about his tunnel vision, his inability to make decisions on the break, his bad decision making in crunch time, and his inability to finish in traffic.
     
  7. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    In the last 3 games, with this 3 guard rotation, I will have to admit Blake is doing a fine job offensively and defensively. And believe me, I was totally against Blake being in the 3 guard rotation. I was hoping for more of the Miller, Rudy and Roy combo. But hey, it's working and it seems Blake is really comfortable with this new role.
     
  8. Blazer_Hippie

    Blazer_Hippie Batum getting ballsy!

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,857
    Likes Received:
    202
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Portland, Oregon
    Trying to think of an example of one that was actually traded...can't come up with one...
     
  9. ABM

    ABM Happily Married In Music City, USA!

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    31,865
    Likes Received:
    5,785
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Commercial Real Estate
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    Z-bo. :D
     
  10. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,542
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Jack
     
  11. WillG

    WillG Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,224
    Likes Received:
    813
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Miller has made Blake redundant. He (Blake), at this stage, only eats into the growth minutes that the younger prospects could be using to mature on the court.

    Whilst it's a poor allocation of minutes by Nate, KP has to take much responsibility for this situation arising in the first place by not wanting to trade 'His Guys'.

    Blake has been good, and we all thank him for that, but for the sake of the teams growth, he needs to be dropped to the bottom of the rotation.
     
  12. ABM

    ABM Happily Married In Music City, USA!

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    31,865
    Likes Received:
    5,785
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Commercial Real Estate
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    No need to go that far. Backup PG would be fine with me.
     
  13. andalusian

    andalusian Season - Restarted

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    15,253
    Likes Received:
    14,692
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    San Marcos, CA
    He did? He is shooting 0.452 from 3 point land? He is able to chase opposing point-guards?

    He made Blake's position as the secondary play-maker redundant, I will agree with that. But, there is more to life than just this point.

    Is this a reference to Rudy or JB? I think Rudy and Blake are playing the same position now - small-guard with some passing ability and ball handling ability (Blake is much better than Rudy in that regard) - but without any real ability to attack the rim from the dribble and the ability to space the floor (but, Rudy has been shooting very poorly this year, so far).

    Blake seems to do much better defensively against quick-guards that are trying to setup other people. Rudy seems to do a little better defensively against quick-guards that are trying to score. I am not really sure Blake is really a problem for Rudy as far as development.

    The other one is JB - who is really a different player than Blake - he is a PG/SG combo that is not a great long-distance shooter (so far) and really thrives on attacking the rim. I do believe that there is a good a chance we will see more JB instead of Blake as time goes on, as long as Roy and Miller seem to mesh better, which they are still working on.

    I am just not buying it. We are no longer in rebuilding mode. We are in full win-now mode and develop going forward at the same time. Until Rudy or JB proves they are better players than Blake is right now - there is no need to bury Blake. He is productive, he shoots lights out spacing the floor better than anyone else we have on the court. It would be foolish to throw him away when we do not have real alternatives to his long-range shooting.
     
  14. Blazer_Hippie

    Blazer_Hippie Batum getting ballsy!

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,857
    Likes Received:
    202
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Portland, Oregon
    So ZBo was traded because Nate was in love with him and wouldn't stop playing him?

    Jack...maybe, but seems more likely Nate wanted to get rid of him...
     
  15. ABM

    ABM Happily Married In Music City, USA!

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    31,865
    Likes Received:
    5,785
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Commercial Real Estate
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    Nahh, he was being showcased. :lol:
     
  16. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    You may be onto something here. Either Miller or Blake maybe showcased here.
     
  17. WillG

    WillG Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,224
    Likes Received:
    813
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You really don't think Steve is eating up Rudys minutes?

    I just think with Miller on board, Blake has essentially become a 2 guard a lot of the time. There are better options on the team at the 2 than Steve Blake.
     
  18. andalusian

    andalusian Season - Restarted

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    15,253
    Likes Received:
    14,692
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    San Marcos, CA
    I do not think Rudy at this point needs development. He is a 23-24 years old with many years of experience as a professional basketball player. So, I do think he is eating up Rudy's minutes - but I do not think Blake is really a problem for Rudy as far as development, which is what I said.

    Blake is playing better than Rudy this year - so he deserves the minutes. It is not hard to understand, imho.
     
  19. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    125,353
    Likes Received:
    145,582
    Trophy Points:
    115
    Blake reminds me of

    [​IMG]
     
  20. WillG

    WillG Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,224
    Likes Received:
    813
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think Rudy is playing sub par because of a lack of minutes.
    I agree Rudy is probably near fully developed, but he is still learning the NBA game.
    The minutes he is missing due to Blake's overuse would help Rudy, who I believe is the superior talent to Blake, and would represent a better long term investment for those minutes.
     

Share This Page