Looks like we made some good adjustments.

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by TradeNurkicNow, Nov 23, 2009.

  1. TradeNurkicNow

    TradeNurkicNow piss

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,196
    Likes Received:
    676
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    hell
    Location:
    shit
    While half our fanbase was busy loading up their fallout shelters, I was looking at our adjustments we had to make. I liked that Nate was talking it out with the team, many coaches in the league will simply up the tempo of practices and become a hardass, but we chose the thinking man's route.

    The two main adjustments, if I remember correctly, were to get Roy doing what Roy does best, and to loosen Greg's reigns a bit.

    Well hell, look what happened tonight? Roy getting to the line at will, and Greg absolutely dominating. I, for one, think we're off to a good start.

    no but srsly roy is a bitch, kp needs to be fired and both of our pgs should be shot out of a cannon
     
    noknobs likes this.
  2. Eastoff

    Eastoff But it was a beginning.

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    16,057
    Likes Received:
    4,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tualatin
    I think the story of the night was GO and LMA. With some sprinkles of Roy doing his job (not spectacular) and DC making an appearance when needed.
     
  3. fumanchu

    fumanchu Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    205
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Credit to Nate for letting Oden and Aldridge continue to play with fouls. At some point they will have to learn how to play with fouls.

    The story of the game was Roy was controlling tempo, scoring 18 with 7 assists. Aldridge and Oden both playing great in spite of the fouls. 24 points each, +10 boards each, and dominating the paint.

    This is the big 3 we all envisioned when Oden was drafted. Sick!
     
  4. handiman

    handiman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,881
    Likes Received:
    3,916
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Is praise really deserved for finally doing what is plainly obvious to most everyone?
     
  5. MIXUM

    MIXUM Suspended

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,983
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    radio/mixmaster/club jock/syndication programmer
    Location:
    lurking in the shadows
    no you are missing the biggest thing of the night....

    DUANTE CUNNINGHAM played instead of Howard. he seems like he has a high b-ball IQ. He also isn't 50. If Howard plays I gurantee we blow that lead.
     
  6. Eastoff

    Eastoff But it was a beginning.

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    16,057
    Likes Received:
    4,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tualatin
    I REALLY REALLY hope they replay this game tomorrow morning!!!
     
  7. alex42083

    alex42083 Thanks Brandon

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    7,789
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Writing about sports
    Location:
    Canby, Wilsonville, Portland
    It's just real nice to see that our Big 3 can play together and have good nights in the same game.. and when it happens, we win easily.
     
  8. SheedSoNasty

    SheedSoNasty Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,983
    Likes Received:
    5,839
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If our big three could play that well every night, we could have Howard start at point guard and we'd still win. Most everyone played a great game that was a blast to watch.
     
  9. SheedSoNasty

    SheedSoNasty Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,983
    Likes Received:
    5,839
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Also, did anyone see Oden nearly kick the bottom of the backboard on his dunk after receiving a pass from Aldridge? Dude would be scary to be in front of after one of those.
     
  10. fumanchu

    fumanchu Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    205
    Trophy Points:
    43
    I like having Miller on the second unit. His ability to get to the hoop and draw fouls. His deft passing late in the clock. Without Travis we need his crafty scoring ability off the bench.

    And Blake's 3 ball is the right compliment to Roy and our bigs in the starting unit.
     
  11. SheedSoNasty

    SheedSoNasty Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,983
    Likes Received:
    5,839
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh I'm definitely not saying that our point guards weren't vital for the win tonight, I'm just really excited to see our top three players do so well on the same night.
     
  12. oldmangrouch

    oldmangrouch persona non grata

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    12,403
    Likes Received:
    6,325
    Trophy Points:
    113
    +1

    Amazing just how seldom it happens.
     
  13. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    Actually, it's pretty immaterial to me who "starts," because the entire starting unit never gets subbed out en masse for the entire second string. "Starting," while it's a respect issue for many players, has no major impact on the game. What matters is who plays more minutes, and I've been imprecisely using "starter" as a proxy for "play the most minutes." I continue to hope that Miller plays significantly more minutes than Blake.
     
  14. rocketeer

    rocketeer Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2003
    Messages:
    3,250
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    38
    this is completely true.

    i didn't get to see the game tonight(watching vince beat the texans and texas basketball instead), but the minutes were distributed pretty close to exactly how i'd like them to be for the blazers. the only real difference being that i'd like for rudy to get 6-8 of blake's minutes.
     
  15. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Biggest thing? Hmmm ...

    A good thing? I agree. Dante brings quite a bit more to the table as a rotation player than Howard and he actually moves around well enough on D and can actually shoot so it gives the guards (like Miller) more targets when they drive the lane.

    The Howard/Przy tandem in the frontcourt wasn't working; the offense would just die on the vine.
     
  16. BoomChakaLaka

    BoomChakaLaka Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,376
    Likes Received:
    2,074
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Designer / Artist
    Location:
    San Miguel de Allende, Mexico (formerly PDX)
    what I posted yesterday (in the "meltdown" thread):

    How to stop the melt-down:

    New starting lineup; Nate changes rotation patterns/methods/rules; Trade to acquire back-up PF; Sign Joel to an extension; off-season focus upon the "right" PG to play alongside Roy. I am one that feels our SF situation will take care of itself (we're with a big problem NOW, because Batum and Outlaw are injured and Webster needs to be starting)
    __________________


    Nate played with a new starting lineup!

    Nate let Oden play through his fouls!

    Nate's player rotations was pretty good tonight! The Blazers are a unique team: one of the few teams that actually excell when 9-10 players play. It was true last year and I see it again this year.

    Joel is the NBA's #1 back-up Center! Sign him now to an extension!

    We held up fine at SF - and Cunningham needs consitent minutes. He doesn't get burned, plays smart, and has a nice shot! Played some decent defense too!



    While some dream of what a star SF might look like with this team - I still am with the belief that a back-up PF is our ticket to advancing deep into the playoffs.

    And I'd trade Blake and Bayless + pick to get Hinrich. Blake and Hinrich are the sort of PG that plays well with Roy. And Hinrich would be an upgrad over Blake/Bayless.


    Hinrich / Miller
    Roy / Rudy
    Webster / Cunningham/ (Batum)
    Aldridge / (Vet banger) / Pendergraph in the Spring / Howard for now (Outlaw when and if he's back)
    Oden / Pryz


    this might get us deep into the playoffs: I'm keeping my eye out for a Vet banger to be added by the trade deadline!
     
    Last edited: Nov 23, 2009
  17. UKRAINEFAN

    UKRAINEFAN Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    14,883
    Likes Received:
    12,055
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    un-retired
    Location:
    Autonomous Republic of Crimea, Ukraine
    Nate has always been able to adjust; that is one of his strengths. But he also has good ideas as far as how he views the team playing to it's potential; and he has the strength to stick with his ideas as long as they seem to have a chance at succeeding.

    Also I wanted to say something about the point guard controversy; I think a simple way to look at is realize Roy and Miller are our best point guards and you want one of your best point guards on the court at all times. So there is going to be 15-20 minutes a night when they are not on the court together, and it's not really important when those minutes are.
     
  18. mook

    mook The 2018-19 season was the best I've seen

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    8,309
    Likes Received:
    3,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Buy a recipe binder at CookbookPeople.com
    Location:
    Jolly Olde England
    Yep. Although Blake sucks, if you start him you don't have to live with him failing to create for the second unit. Hide him in plain sight.

    The team's success seems to show that we need at SF some form of athletic warm body ranging between 6'6 and 6'8. Webster qualifies, but he's not exactly blowing away expectations there.

    Ime Udoka sucked, but I now wish we'd signed him over Mills. Webster is pretty mediocre, but if he gets injured there's nothing else there.
     

Share This Page