Not the FIRST moon landing where we claimed we did it. That was all fake. It was a battle with Russia to see who would get there first and we didn't want to lose moral so we lied to our country and told them we made it first. Why is that hard to believe? I bet you think Kennedy wasn't an inside job too.
seconded.. I'm sure there is a reason we arent hearing it on all the major news outlets.. it would kinda be "big news"
haha i doubted the moon landing as well. no way for me to know for sure, but that documentary they did, "from the earth to the moon" was really good, and if they didnt, those fake astronauts are amazing actors. like fucking amazing crying on cue inside the actors studio crazy good.
if bin laden is alive he should just turn himself in to somewhere. the tension would be fucking incredible, the riots, fucking a. that would be the real nightmare, if we captured him.
I looked at the article originally linked to. A couple of things: 1. Why should we believe "veteranstoday.com"? Have they ever broken news of anything the level of this importance? Do they have any sort of agenda with their site? I would guess "no" and "yes". 1a. Why can't that article use grammar correctly? Dear Lord. The first sentence alone ("Conservative commentator, former Marine Colonel Bob Pappas has been saying for years that bin Laden died at Tora Bora and that Senator Kerry's claim that bin Laden escaped with Bush help was a lie.") has at least two simple error errors. 2. I don't see any evidence in that piece that he's alive. 3. If there WERE evidence, wouldn't it have been put into the column, and wouldn't (as others have pointed out) at least ONE major outlet have picked it up? It's just all silliness by people who don't really understand logic nor proper use of the English language. Ed O.
I'm torn on bin Laden. But I THINK he may be alive, just irrelevant, hiding in a cave. Coward.-- But I think that our government left him alive purposely (when we could have killed him in 2001 or 2002 I believe) because killing/capturing him would have maybe made people think our job was done there, when they wanted it to just begin. Kennedy's assassination WAS an inside job (IMO). I'm pretty sure about this. Kennedy was the last real president we had, and the military and CIA didn't like it. The military wanted Vietnam with their industrial complex, and the CIA was pissed for Kennedy's orders at the Bay of Pigs among others. It wasn't until the 90s that some in Congress finally admitted that a very large player in the assassination was working for the CIA (true story). 9/11 (IMO) was done by the terrorists. Did the Bush admin. know about it early? Very possible. They needed an excuse to invade Iraq, as countless books, tapes, and even now the British investigation into Iraq shows, they were talking about invading Iraq on January 21, 2001. I also think it is possible FDR may have known Japan was going to attack Pearl Harbor, but kind of let them because he needed an excuse to get America into WW2 (He was right that we needed to join there most likely, so at least his reason was better than the 9/11 reason if true). I don't think the Moon Landing was fake at all. Those are my thoughts.
As I understood, they had heard a threat about the attack, but they hear threats all the time. So they didn't think much about at the time.
I said it was very possible the Bush admin. had prior knowledge. I'm not prepared to say anything more than that, especially something like the government flew those planes into the WTC and Pentagon or they were missiles or w/e. I agree that the collapse is also questionable. Oh well, hopefully as time passes we will learn more just like with the JFK assassination. You have to realize, the JFK assassination was more than 45 years ago, while 9/11 was less than a decade ago. I know a lot more to be able to form a more clear opinion on that. There is also a ton more evidence (IMO) that the Kennedy assassination was an inside job. The 9/11 plot is at least realistic. Terrorists could have hijacked the planes and crashed them into targets. I have trouble believing that guy could have shot Kennedy. Just my opinion. Kennedy was a legend. Either way. They called him a commie at the time though, and some weren't all that upset by his assassination.
Just SYK, my point wasn't about physical evidence, time or anything like that. My point was that IF you can believe the government setup Kennedy to be murdered and the government has that kind of power\ability. Why would they not have that same power\ability now with the WTC? My biggest problem with it all, (amongst the 1000 other facts about WTC) is that jet fuel cannot burn steel. It does not get hot enough. That simple fact alone should give people a clue. And then I am supposed to believe that "fire shot over from WTC towers to WTC 7 and burned it to the floor too." ???????? I am supposed to believe that a magic fire bolt shot over from the WTC towers to the building across the street that just HAPPENS to have VERY important documents in it from CIA, DEA, IRS and all that?!??! Really?!?!?!?!?! And that magic fire bolt didn't hit ANY other building on the way to WTC7 ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? SERIOUS?!?!?!?! My second biggest problem with this all is the fact that Americans are so naive and trustworthy of their government, they think Uncle Sam couldn't possibly do something like knock down the towers or assassinate Kennedy. Just makes me sick to think how blind people are. Anyhow... sorry I kind of went off topic there.
Correct. I'm not saying they don't have the power to do this, but I personally think that if 9/11 was really an inside job it would take a TON of people and excellent planning to set this up -- a lot of people would have to be involved. I don't think they could have possibly kept all those people from ever saying a word about it. There would be a break somewhere, IMO. So I think that maybe it could have been aided and turned a blind eye to for political and agenda reasons by a pretty damn corrupt regime. Also, I know you aren't talking about facts, but I do personally believe that the JFK conspiracy has a lot of VERY interesting facts that go against the official report. Moreover, applying some common sense can further help debunk the official story. It wasn't until 30 years after that certain CIA ties were released to the murder of Kennedy. I still think we need some more things to come to light from the 9/11 attacks to have some more wide spread doubt. But this recent Christmas day failed terror attack shows us that sometimes our intelligence and homeland security can be incompetent.
Well said. I would like to learn more about the Kennedy murder. Any good sites or links you could point me to? Movies, documentaries? Have you seen Loose Change about 9-11? It is great and I recommend watching it if you have not seen it.
Yeah, I've seen lots of good things about 9/11. But a good JFK move is entitled JFK. It is a 3 hour ish real movie. Kevin Costner stars as the person who it trying to find out about the murder. It is amazing.
