It was merely a question. Obviously no one knows an answer, but the smartass answer is not necessary. He made a nice move and got a nice and 1. No reason to take him out at that point for Webster.
Where did I say it was some sort of dig or attack? I merely said the smartass/sarcastic answer was not needed. It is no secret I am a Bayless homer if you will, but when he makes a nice play I don't see the point in substituting Webster for Bayless, perhaps he could have made another basket? Who knows? I just didn't think the substitution was necessary.
Neither do I, which is why I threw out a 'non' answer ... you calling it smartass, seems to imply you took offense, ya dig?
good god the Wiz suck. Portland is crushing them, have won 9 of 11, and the crew is dominating the game thread... good times! STOMP