95.5 guys are slaying Nate. Saying he almost came across the table at Kenny Vance because Vance had the nerve to suggest the offense might need adjusting. Nate wants to keep the same offense as he has had, and they are all saying....including Tone' that the only reason it was successful two years ago was because we made an abnormally large ammount of our 3's C'mon guys, come tell me they are off base. They also said Nate probably wouldn't want Paul because he would have to adjust his offense
I would bet that they're embellishing things a bit, considering the sources. The offense needs tweaking, and if it's Nate who keeps Paul off the team (and it's a really no brainer trade), I hope he quits.
I have a very hard time picturing Nate coming across a table at anyone. I do hope they revamp the offense though.
Never embellishing when it sides with MM. I heard Kenny tell the story last week and he was laughing while he said it, so I bet that's about how "serious" Nate was. Though he is right that Nates offense is far from perfect.
I didn't hear that he almost came across the table, but I did hear that things got very awkward in Vegas and that Nate gave Vance a pretty cold-blooded stare and his demeanor was not exactly friendly when it was suggested that the offense could stand a little tweaking. I will say this about Nate, I've grown to hate his offense, but it is his offense and ultimately he's going to sink or swim using it.
I think this is the reason Bob Ociepka was picked up, he has literally written books about the subject. He is known as a highly intelligent basketball mind around the NBA, so let's wait and see.
Mediocre Man Bob might make you an offer you can't refuse. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNzYzwgMsVU&feature=player_embedded#!
That's why i can't understand why nate says Ociepka will be in charge of the defense, or was that just Oregonian's take?
Hmmmmmm... How come every single one of you are questioning the best young coach in the NBA's offense? What exactly is it you like about him? The defense? That's just average by the way. Is it his brilliant playoff adjustments?
With Nate's "bad" offensive scheme - this team was 1st in efficiency in the 54 win season and 7th last year with all the injuries, add the fact that even in the playoffs - with Roy being a no-factor on offense, the team still was 7th in offensive efficiency, and I get back to the fact that this team's problem is not offense. It would be nice to get it better, but that will come with maturity. Also - Jenny Vance is a douche.
ABM and I were listening to 95.5 last night and they reported that Nate himself weanted to make a few adsjustments and was making coaching changes to that end.
I know a lot of folks bitch about Nate's offense. But lets face it. Some of the players running it weren't so hot either, and it takes talent to play at a high level in the league. You will note, that the number of wins has increased from year to year, but also as each year passes, we are further removed from the year where we bottomed out in talent.
I like Michael Holton's take on the offense when he was on WaW the other day, "plays don't make players, players make plays." The fact of the matter is that our team sets lousy picks and when you don't set good hard picks in a pick and roll (or pick and pop) offense things don't work properly.
I like the fact that players respect him and respond to him. You could be the best coach in the world, but if players tune you out, you won't be an effective coach. Nate might not have the best offense (although how people complain about a 50 win season with all those injuries, I don't get), but he motivates players and gets them to play hard. That is a valuable asset to have in a coach.
I'm not sure there's a more overrated trait than "playing hard for the coach." Which of the top 16 teams DON'T play hard for the coach and or themselves? I'd rather have a coach that gets the best out of his team. Couldn't care less if they play hard for him and it leads to nothing. Make no mistake, he's mastered the art of strangling a season to death and winning 50 games lulling the opponent to sleep. He still has yet to prove his system can win in the playoffs. Not sure why were allowing a guy who's never actually proved he can win anything with his system try and slam square pegs into round holes.
Cleveland Cavs should of went to the finals, Where was Lebron!? If he listened to Mike Brown the Way B-Roy Listens to Nate, Cleveland would have went to the finals Did you not watch last season? How did we win all those games with such a depleted roster?
