Okay, I read it. What's your point? It's nothing more than a list of workplace rules (NO laws) like any workplace has. Who cares? DHS can fire these people because they misunderstood the somewhat confusing whistleblower guidelines, but they clearly acted in good faith in exposing the criminal conspiracy they discovered was being carried out by DHS management in protecting and concealing and PAYING these criminals. The result of all this should eventually be the conviction and imprisonment of any and all DHS employees and managers who are part of this conspiracy to commit fraud against the US Government. It's obvious that this crime has been committed and now it's a matter of punishing all those responsible. There's a good chance there are bribes, coercion and payola involved. A strong case could be made in court that they went directly to the public (which IS our government, read the Constitution) as it is well-known to the entire world that the Federal Branches of our government are co-conspirators in protecting Hispanic illegal aliens from prosecution for their crimes. It could be successfully argued that it was their civic duty to protect their country from a government that has basically been overthrown by Mexico and is no longer protecting it's own citizens.
My complaint is with Federal agencies knowingly and purposefully breaking Federal laws, which it's clear DHS has done. They have not only abetted and harbored criminals, they have paid them with tax $. The whistle-blowers broke no law, only "policies". The DHS is who is breaking the law.
At the same time, the Privacy Rule is balanced so that it permits the disclosure of personal health information needed for patient care and other important purposes. National Security seems "important", but maybe just to me. Nearly every significant step of societal progress in this country began with a dedicated citizen having the stones to personally go against current government policy. I believe this is one of times. This case, if the Feds or state pursue it will lead to new legislation forcing agencies to report suspected illegal aliens. Laws already exist on this, but apparently need strengthening.
