question, whats the difference between 7.1MP and 6.3MP (camera)

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by CelticKing, Aug 19, 2010.

  1. CelticKing

    CelticKing The Green Monster

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Messages:
    15,334
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Shaqachusetts
    I never understood what's the difference? 6.3MP says it's 3:2? so what's 7.1MP then?

    Which should I leave on to have best quality pics taken?
     
  2. Eastoff

    Eastoff But it was a beginning.

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,892
    Likes Received:
    3,827
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tualatin
    I don't know specifics for cameras, but I'd just assume 7.1 > 6.3
     
  3. CelticKing

    CelticKing The Green Monster

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Messages:
    15,334
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Shaqachusetts
    That's what I'm thinking too.....
     
  4. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    116,415
    Likes Received:
    114,439
    Trophy Points:
    115
    What kind of camera?

    That's something you should play around with. On many cameras using the highest resolution with give you bad shutter lag. Taking at a lower res will often given you better pictures (less blur).
     
  5. CelticKing

    CelticKing The Green Monster

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Messages:
    15,334
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Shaqachusetts
    Kodak Z712 IS

    I've used 7.1 but was wondering maybe 6.3 will give me better quality? lol
     
  6. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    meh, MP is a misleading spec. It is all about the optics. You can have a 5MP camera take better pictures than a 12MP camera due to better optics. The MP spec has become the specification of choice my marketing to throw out there to grab buyers. It is the same thing as stereo equipment's "wattage" ratings.
     
  7. MrSelfDestruct

    MrSelfDestruct Louie, Louie, Louie

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2009
    Messages:
    945
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Occupation:
    Buying
    Location:
    Sammamish, WA
    Generally speaking, the higher the MP the better. You're taking the pictures at a higher resolution which means you can enlarge them to bigger prints if you wanted. If you never plan on enlarging anything past 5" x 7" the 6.3 will do fine.

    3:2 refers to the ratio the picture is taken in. Prints are typically in this ratio- 2" x 3", 4" x 6", 5" x 7" etc. Digital cameras will usually always take pictures in different ratios than the standard 3:2, meaning some of the image will be lost when prints are made. The 3:2 is just a matter of convenience.

    I've never found a difference of shutter lag on the same camera between resolution settings. I have seen it take longer to write the image and be ready to shoot again (of course this was back in the days of Compact Flash and Smart Media cards being the most prevalent memory cards), but with the advent of of SD and xD cards, that has been greatly improved. My 12.1MP Canon SD780 writes quick and I shoot at 12.1 all the time.

    One big thing to reduce the blurriness in your pictures: Push the shoot button halfway down, let the camera focus, then push the rest of the way to take the shot. The autofocus is what I've seen cause the highest amount of lag between the pushing the button and the image appearing. A lot of people want to take pictures like they did with film (a single press) but digital doesn't work best that way.

    Note: This is for point-and-shoot cameras. DSLRs are an entirely different animal.

    EDIT: Also, agree with Blazerboy30.
     
  8. CelticKing

    CelticKing The Green Monster

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Messages:
    15,334
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Shaqachusetts
    Thanks for the help guys. Appreciate it. :)
     
  9. Eastoff

    Eastoff But it was a beginning.

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,892
    Likes Received:
    3,827
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tualatin
    Can one typically find out the quality of the optics on a camera though?
     
  10. EL PRESIDENTE

    EL PRESIDENTE Username Retired in Honor of Lanny.

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    50,346
    Likes Received:
    22,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    about $50 cock sucker, beat it!

    :NOTMARIS:

    (its an old Jay-Z line)
     
  11. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I'm not aware of a readily available spec. Maybe some comparisons or word-of-mouth?
     
  12. EL PRESIDENTE

    EL PRESIDENTE Username Retired in Honor of Lanny.

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    50,346
    Likes Received:
    22,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    link us the cameras and we'll tell you which is better.
     

Share This Page