Do you really want to debate whether were playing the same ball right now as we were during the first 5 or so games of the season?
haha, your like a little peasant aren't you. A bad shooting game, yes. Still a better shooting % than Aldridge while averaging double the amount of rebounds he does, yes.
I don't even care about Love v Aldridge, but you need to check your facts. Aldridge - 43.5% Love - 43.3% Checkmate.
You were wrong. Aldridge in his worst season so far is still a better FG% shooter than Love. Anyhow, another 20/20 game for Love, another loss for his team. Ho Hum...
I can't seem to find anywhere with updated stats of Love's FG%. Until I see that I won't admit I'm wrong. I don't have a problem admitting when I'm wrong, I've done it numerous times on this board. I have yet to ever see you admit you were wrong. Here's a good read for you (seriously): http://www.tartaglia.com/pages/admitting.html
All you have to do is add 7 makes to his total makes this year and 22 attempts to his total attempts this year, then divide the two. Not hard!
Too lazy. Cool, I was wrong. You get a cookie. Love is still better than Aldridge. Will you atleast admit that?
I know you didn't direct your post at me, but is Love better at putting up stats on a 5-17 team. Sure. I already have said this on the board. Once again, he's a Stat Machine on a bad team. That's what he has proven so far in the NBA.
You can't blame the guy for having bad teammates around him. You also have to realize that he's putting up 20/20 type numbers frequently at just 22 years old.
Beasley's having an all right year, but he's too damn inconsistent. If Beasley can continue to get better they might have a solid future in Minnesota. Love is only 22 and Beasley is 21.
