WWE & TNA Schedule Head-To-Head Pay-Per-View Event

Discussion in 'Pro Wrestling' started by truebluefan, Jan 13, 2011.

  1. truebluefan

    truebluefan Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    212,768
    Likes Received:
    821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Within TNA's announcement that they are changing their PPV schedule, they noted that they are moving Victory Road from July to March and Destination X from March to July.

    With Destination X, they have specifically named the date July 17, 2011. This is the same day that WWE has Money in the Bank scheduled for.

    One of the companies will definitely change the date of their PPV. Anyone wanna' bet it's going to be TNA?

    source: EWN
     
  2. ToCool74

    ToCool74 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2011
    Messages:
    212
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    We'll currently TNA simply does not have the kind of pull that WWE has some yea i'm willing to bet TNA will try to switch there PPV.
     
  3. Big Frame

    Big Frame Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Messages:
    4,280
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    48
    It wouldn't be a bad thing if they went head to head on this one PPV. Force both of them to have a great PPV.
     
  4. Moo2K4

    Moo2K4 NBA West Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    11,768
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Alburnett, Iowa
    It might be good for booking purposes, but I TNA would still lose a lot of PPV buys, simply because WWE has a more established fan base, and in all likelihood, if a wrestling fan has to choose between the two, they're probably going to take WWE.
     
  5. Big Frame

    Big Frame Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Messages:
    4,280
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    48
    But if WWE gives you Shemus vs Dolph Ziggler main event compared to Jeff Hardy vs Mr. Anderson. What would you rather see?
     
  6. Moo2K4

    Moo2K4 NBA West Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    11,768
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Alburnett, Iowa
    No question I'd rather see a Hardy vs. Anderson main event. My point is that more wrestling fans are WWE fans first and other brands second. If what people cared about most was in-ring stuff, then ROH would be the most watched wrestling program in the US. Instead, it's not, and that's because the WWE has been around for forever and has established a really good fan base, so they're able to get away with poor booking, and would still obliterate a TNA PPV in head to head buys if TNA was stupid enough to let it happen.
     
  7. agoo

    agoo Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    2,868
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    38
    If WWE knows this is happening, they'll have a better card. Also, as an in-ring performance goes, Ziggler is the best of the four you mentioned and Ziggler-Edge is going to be a good match, regardless of Ziggler's lack of main event status.
     
  8. Moo2K4

    Moo2K4 NBA West Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    11,768
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Alburnett, Iowa
    I'll have to disagree, as I'll take Hardy over Ziggler any day of the week. Dolph is solid, but I much prefer watching Jeff in the ring. His style is much more entertaining to watch for me.

    And I agree, Ziggler vs. Edge should be good since they're both damn good in the ring, but I just don't like Ziggler hitting main event status out of seemingly nowhere. I know they've been giving him small pushes with how long he held the title, but seriously, main event status the night he loses the IC title? Seems unnecessary...especially with how beatable of a champion he was.
     

Share This Page