White House Expects Deficit to Spike to $1.65 Trillion

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by Denny Crane, Feb 14, 2011.

  1. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100...43253522341850.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories

    WASHINGTON—The White House projected Monday that the federal deficit would spike to $1.65 trillion in the current fiscal year, the largest dollar amount ever, adding pressure on Democrats and Republicans to tackle growing levels of debt.

    Mr. Obama is proposing $3.73 trillion in government spending in the next fiscal year, part of a plan that includes budget cuts and tax increases that administration officials believe will sharply bring down the federal deficit over 10 years.
     
  2. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    I have to applaud the president for talking a good game, but they still don't get it.

    $3.73T is an overall increase in spending, up from $3.55T. I don't see any actual cuts, just reshuffling of deck chairs on the titanic.

    In order to make a real dent, federal spending has to move toward the $2.4T the government actually takes in, not away from it.

    I don't know why anyone would trust these people at their word. $800B in stimulus would keep unemployment below 8% (FALSE). The deficit would be cut in half by 2011 (it's the highest EVER, FALSE).
     
  3. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    Gotta spend money to make money.

    Simply raising taxes on the uber-wealthy while cutting the myriad of subsidies to their businesses is a simple way to balance the budget.

    Taxes today on the rich are nearly non-existent compared to pre-Reagan America.

    Alzheimer Ron cut the top rate from 70% to 50%, creating the largest deficit in history. But more importantly, he cancelled the common man's medical deductions and destroyed the unions, setting back wages several decades. The minimum wage would be $40+ hr now if it had kept pace with inflation. A strong middle-class is required for a strong economy.

    To post blame on anyone now for the damage done back then demonstrates an lack of understanding of cause and effect, and accomplishes nothing. Restoring the tax code to pre-Ronnie levels would have this country back on it's feet in no time at all.
     
  4. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,303
    Likes Received:
    5,884
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    I am so looking forward to this budget fight. I'm in the camp that cutting $100B from discretionary spending, even for the remainder of FY 2011, is an insult for those who wish to constrain the budget. I hope the House does move forward with passing appropriations in sections, first with entitlements and the military, and then with the discretionary parts of the budget. Make the Democratic Senate vote for massively increasing deficits to continue wasteful discretionary government programs.
     
  5. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    The problems really seem to be with Social Security and Medicare. Blame Bush for hastening the demise Medicare. Otherwise, if you understand so much about cause and effect, you'd be harping on FDR for blowing up the govt. to ridiculous size and committing the spending of future dollars on current expenses without the hope of that ever changing.
     
  6. BLAZER PROPHET

    BLAZER PROPHET Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,725
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    dental malpractice claims adjuster
    Location:
    Portland area
    Continuing to raise taxes on the "wealthy", however one defines that, certainly isn't going to solve a budget issue. That's how we got in this mess- rising taxes for social spending. Maybe rather than making the same old mistake (tax & spend), perhaps we should look at trimming a bloated budget, reassess where our money is being wasted (both within social programs and elsewhere), and then lower taxes to support growth.
     
  7. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/feb/14/debt-now-equals-total-us-economy/

    Mr. Obama‘s budget projects that 2011 will see the biggest one-year debt jump in history, or nearly $2 trillion, to reach $15.476 trillion by Sept. 30, the end of the fiscal year. That would be 102.6 percent of GDP - the first time since World War II that dubious figure has been reached.

    And the budget projects the government will run a deficit of $1.645 trillion this year, topping 2009’s previous record by more than $230 billion. By contrast, 2007’s deficit was just $160 billion altogether.
     
  8. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    I'm waiting for some "believer" to tell me Obama actually is cutting the budget (because he says so!).
     
  9. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    No it isn't.

    We got into this mess by transferring onto the backs of the middle-class the debt accumulated by the government to further enrich the rich.

    We had a record surplus that Bush blew completely in his first term. In 8 years he literally spent more money than any man in the history of the world, none of it his own.

    He should have been impeached for violating his fiduciary duty to his country.
     
  10. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    And now Obama is making Bush look very fiscally conservative. Should Obama be impeached?
     
  11. mook

    mook The 2018-19 season was the best I've seen

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    8,309
    Likes Received:
    3,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Buy a recipe binder at CookbookPeople.com
    Location:
    Jolly Olde England
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2011
  12. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,303
    Likes Received:
    5,884
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    Obama wants to spend more on the military than does the GOP. There's plenty of waste to be cut from the Pentagon, the question is does Washington have the will to face it? It seems the GOP is just addressing discretionary spending for the rest of FY2011 but will address everything come FY2012.
     
  13. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I'm not arguing, but your post actually made me consider an interesting question. If the $7,000 per household is too much, how much would you be willing to spend on the military for an attempt to keep this country and your family safe? Tough to put a number on that one.
     
  14. Sug

    Sug Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,991
    Likes Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You all just don't get it do you? Nobody is going to do a thing to end the debt. Deal with it.
     
  15. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,303
    Likes Received:
    5,884
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    Care to come to a Tea Party meeting?
     
  16. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    I'd think about $500 per person per year should be more than adequate to defend our country from attack. 90% or more of the military budget is spent defending other countries and overthrowing other countries. Graft has been rampant in defense spending since the late fifties. Maybe 1/3rd of the total military budget is lost through criminal overcharges by defense contractors. It's not like Ike didn't warn us
     
  17. bluefrog

    bluefrog Go Blazers, GO!

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    1,964
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Programmer
    Location:
    New Bern
    I think $3,000 per household is enough. If we go by the US 2010 census there are about 115 million households which would put the defense budget at $345 billion. That's more than the rest of the entire world's military expenditure and over three times the military spending of China. (I got all these numbers from wikipedia)

    What do you think is adequate?
     
  18. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I don't know what is adequate, but your numbers seem reasonable. I think it is important to stay far ahead of the rest of the world with our military, and that is one of the most important things the government is actually supposed to do.
     
  19. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,102
    Likes Received:
    57,270
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Somebodies gotta pay for those flying saucers we have stowed away in Area 51.
     
  20. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Historically (since WW II), our military spending has been 3% to 6% of GDP. Seems like 3% is reasonable to me.

    3% of $14T is about $420B, and we're spending closer to $800B. I'd be happy if govt. cut spending to the $420B figure.

    As far as us spending more than anyone else - if every country spends 3% of their GDP on defense, the US would dwarf the rest, militarily. Our GDP is 1/3 the entire world's GDP.
     

Share This Page