tl;dr article about what to do with Oden

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by BrianFromWA, May 17, 2011.

  1. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I believe the odds of him resigning a long term ~$10 mil per yr deal is a lock; so initially beginning your negotiations with a max offer is pointless. We can resign him anyways for less. It reminds me of the same people up in arms that we didn't give Brandon a max offer with a player option from day one. Well I wish we had been more assertive in those negotiations.

    Players never turn down their first huge payday from the team who drafted them. We can offer more money than other teams and Greg will take the extra money. Now if another team offers a max deal to Greg I would probably bite the bullet and match, but there is no advantage to preemptively backing your own ass into such a corner.
     
  2. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,196
    Likes Received:
    30,335
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    It's hard to say for sure since we don't know what the cap will be for next season. The teams that look to be able to make a sizable offer on a FA though, include the Nuggets, Pacers, Clippers, Nets, Kings, and Wizards.
     
  3. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ben Gordon says hello. He turned down a 6/58M offer with Chicago to sign a 6.4M qo, and then as an UFA signed a 5/55M deal with DET. Chicago received nothing in return.

    And I'm not advocating starting "negotiations" with a max. It's binary. If you offer him a contract it's either the Max or the QO. If he accepts the QO then he's gone in 2012. You don't get a chance to match. You lost out. If he signs the max he's a Blazer for the next 6 years at a price of an extra Darko or Webster or 2/3rds of an Outlaw.

    It's not about price. It's about risk management. And the "likely" risk of him leaving combined with the "disastrous" effect if he goes somewhere else to play his prime without compensation to the Blazers is, imho, worth a Webster contract.
     
  4. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    it's not the teams who will offer him a contract that you worry about. I think we'd all be ecstatic if Oden signed an offer sheet with the Kings for, say, 4/50 b/c we'd match it. That's not the issue. Once we offer the QO, he can take that 9M, play with us for a year and then go wherever the hell he wants to for whatever price he wants to.

    It's about not letting it get to the Ben Gordon (or Josh Childress, for that matter) point.
     
  5. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,303
    Likes Received:
    5,884
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    So my point is made. You can find something else to nitpick about now. Vaya con Dios.
     
  6. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Stupid example and not applicable or relevant to us keeping Greg. Chicago withdrew their offer to Gordon as a RFA then never offered him a deal as a UFA. Gordon wanted to play in Chicago.

    If anything your examples show how management has the upper hand in these negotiations and should be guarded in their offers.

    Can you provide ONE example of a quality free agent leaving after his rookie contract when his team wants to keep him? There are dozens of examples of teams overpaying which sets the franchise back most if a decade.
     
  7. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ben Gordon is completely relevant. He didn't get an offer that he wanted either in October 2007 (his extension, like Roy and LMA signed) or in 2008 (where he was offered 6/58 by CHI, whether it was rescinded later or not) and CHI DID offer him a deal as a UFA.

    This actually shows, contrary to what you're saying, that a team that offered a long-term, contract worth over $50M to a player it drafted 3 years in a row, and it ended up that he left for nothing. Sure, CHI could get over it (and did) b/c they lucked into Rose with the #1 pick. Can't say that about the Blazers.

    I'm assuming that you think Josh Childress doesn't count as a "quality free agent"?
     
  8. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Chicago only made a token offer to Gordon and withdrew it quick. They didn't want to resign him. And he never got a max offer.
     
  9. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Didn't say he did. If he would've been offered one, I doubt he would've just signed the QO and attempted UFA. :)
     
  10. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This ESPN article shows the Bulls didn't want to resign Gordon. "Right after the season, I knew I probably wouldn't be back in a Chicago Bulls uniform," Gordon said, adding the Bulls didn't negotiate to re-sign him. As Denny also said, the Bulls were not interested in resigning Gordon at the overpaid amount the Pistons offered. How has overpaying for players worked out for Detroit?

    Chicago was reluctant to invest huge dollars and lose possible future cap space for a player who hadn't proven to be an above average starter. Chicago was careful not to overpay and give out bloated contracts, as a result they've been able to surround Rose with a quality supporting cast.

    Childress was traded to Phoenix, Atlanta didn't want to sign him. In hindsight that's a smart move for Atlanta, Josh has been a poorly performing reserve and is the likely candidate to be cut from the team if there is an amnesty clause in the next CBA.
     
    Last edited: May 18, 2011
  11. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Anyone (Ben Gordon) who scores 20 PPG is an above average starter. Look at what he did in the playoffs against Boston - 33 points in game 7, 26 points/6 assists in game 5, 42 points in game 2.

    The Bulls did give out bloated contracts to Kirk Hinrich and Tyson Chandler and Luol Deng. They also continuously paid huge contract dollars to a spot on the roster that contributed little - guys like Antonio Davis, PJ Brown, Tim Thomas, etc.

    If anything, I think the Bulls scored well in the draft with Deng, Gibson, Asik, Noah, and Rose. The cap space allowed them to sign a perennial all-star (Boozer) that they have turned into mush, and a few less than average players that give the team a lot of depth.

    Thibodeau sure looks like a great coach.
     

Share This Page