SI says we're taking Chris Singleton

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Shooter, Jun 14, 2011.

  1. THE HCP

    THE HCP NorthEastPortland'sFinest

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    71,257
    Likes Received:
    59,918
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    N.E.P.
    NONE of these guys will make an impact regardless! Bring in some vets!
     
  2. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Thinking that the team should settle on inferior prospects (or "safe" players, or "role" players) is what has hurt us recently in the draft, IMO. We SHOULD be swinging for the fences with our picks, rather than settling on someone who has a lower probable ceiling.

    I don't know that much about Singleton, but I look at his four years in college and I wonder how he still wasn't much of a player offensively. Raw players who have played four years of college scare me.

    If he's the best prospect, though, then I would be fine with us drafting him... better than reaching for a guy merely because of need.

    Ed O.
     
  3. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,192
    Likes Received:
    30,329
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    It wouldn't be surprising to me if the Blazers traded out of the first round and packaged their pick with a player or two to bring back a more experienced guy. This team is past the point where continuing to stock the roster with rookies is the right thing to do.
     
  4. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Past the point in what sense? Do you think there's some kind of window that the team is going to miss if they don't add another veteran?

    I'm all for getting rookies if they have good potential. The rookies that we've seen lately (except maybe Babbitt; too soon to tell) haven't had that.

    Ed O.
     

Share This Page