Dave from Blazers edge continues hiss negative blazer views...

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Brock, Jan 6, 2012.

  1. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    Yeah, it's a load of steaming shit. The Blazers were a playoff team last year who upped pace with Felton and now have an older Batum, a better LMA, a comfortable and integrated Wallace, a healthy Camby, a guy off the bench in Crawford who can get off a shot at any time and can play the point.

    I've never much agreed with "Dave from BlazersEdge", though, so I admit my view of anything he writes is negatively biased.
     
  2. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    To be fair, I'm not sure MM's post was implying anything negative as much as pointing out a possible reason for the improve stat.

    On the other hand, we've become so used to MM's posts being unfounded criticism that we immediately assume he's being negative. :lol:
     
  3. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    "Blow it up"

    It's going to suck when teams figure out how to stop the Blazers, and solve their defense. Maybe as well rebuild now.

    I see Portland going 5-28 in the second half of the season with this group of scrubs and their jerkwater coach.

    It will be just like the Ducks, and what happened in the Rose Bowl this year after Wisconsin's Top 8 defense had a month to prepare for Chip Kelly and his gimmicky offense.
     
    Last edited: Jan 6, 2012
  4. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    True, and I do have one small criticism, and it pertains to Jamal Crawford. Watching him dribble the ball for 7 seconds and then launching a shot (which he missed) with 13 seconds on the shot clock, and 2:10 left in the game, alarmed me. I appreciate chuckers as much as anyone (I was the last defender of Outlaw Island, for example), but at least be smart about it. Nate pulled him right after that shot, too.
     
  5. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    124,841
    Likes Received:
    145,119
    Trophy Points:
    115
    :clap:
     
  6. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Agreed. That was a little frustrating to watch. With about 2:30 left, we ran the 1-4 offense like we used to do with Roy, but with Jamal handling the ball. We had a terrible possession and I remember thinking we better not keep running that 1-4 offense for the final 2:30.
     
  7. HailBlazers

    HailBlazers RipCity

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    19,973
    Likes Received:
    17,182
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PDX
    Still of lot of growing yet to do for this team, and that's a good thing. Were only going to get better.
     
  8. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    I have to give Nate credit for yanking him after that shot. I'll also give Crawford credit for not sulking about it, because if you saw after the game, he and LMA embraced for a good 15 seconds or so, and Jamal was all over the court high-fiving during timeouts after he was pulled.
     

Share This Page