Um, in what sense do they "bring it on themselves"? Are they choosing to discriminate against themselves? Let's apply that reasoning to, I don't know, religion. Nobody is GENETICALLY Christian, so clearly they CHOOSE to be Christian, so it's fair game to discriminate against them, because they bring it on themselves.
I don't feel that way at all, just saying that those opposed look at it as a not protected class because they think it is a choice, and not that they are born that way.
I think Smurfs are gay. I mean come on man! They only have one female and no one is even interested? Then you got that "Vanity" guy that's all about putting flowers on his hat! And papa smurf doesn't even have a shirt on. What gives?
Perhaps the poster should learn about 1) natural selection, what it is and isn't 2) the thousands, literally, of research articles on homosexuality/bixexuality/transgender in the animal world 3) the theories on inheritance of sexual orientation and how natural selection worked on the genetic tendency to homosexuality 4) the hundreds of thousands of gay men and lesbians who are parents, since you seem to think being gay and procreating are mutually exclusive Honestly, I am also tired of people with no information saying they KNOW about something they don't know about. Whether being gay or cosmology or global warming or whatever. I mean, it isn't that hard to visit a library and learn a few things. Maybe I should be more charitable. But guess what? Homophobia is NOT genetic. So maybe someone should finally learn better. Tell me, genius, did you, at some point, sit down and say, hmmm, am I going to decide to be gay or decide to be straight? Did you thoughtfully consider the relative advantages of being gay and being straight? Did you check out both and then decide what you liked better? Or did you know you were attracted to girls/women before you even lost your virginity, if you have? So why is it so fucking impossible to believe that LGBT people ALSO know from Day 1 who we are?
I got a question. If this does have something to do with evolution... What if we all end up being gay? Does our genome survive?
I got a question. If this does have something to do with evolution... What if we all end up being gay? Does our genome survive?
Yes, haven't you ever seen movies/tv shows where the lesbian couple ask their guy friend to impregnate them?
I've seen "Children of Men"; and the chaos that comes with humanity not being able to have children. So then westnob. Do you think that "Natural Selection" promotes homosexuality?
For the love of God (no pun intended) TAKE A FUCKING CLASS! If you REALLY want to understand biology THERE ARE CLASSES. Don't ask people on internet basketball forums. But be warned: if you do, you might feel embarrassed that you ever asked questions like that.
Now, now. Let's not get huffy. Why not bring it to a forum like this? There's a great cross section of people with differing opinions. It's educational in and of itself. Besides, not all biology classes are alike- as evidenced by this thread. Get my drift?
How do lesbian tigers ask male tigers to impregnate them? Are the male tigers rapists if they bone lesbian tigers? Or is the consent of the lesbian tigers assumed? Also, how do the lesbian tigers decide which one of them will have the baby? The teets get stretched out having a litter and the belly drops to the ground, so somebody must sacrifice their sexy tigress figure!
I do find the "homosexual animal" thing quite funny. Hell, I knew a kid in junior high who got his dick stuck in his cat when he had a friend over. His nickname was "Bobcat" (his first name was Bob) until his parents finally moved. A monkey going stankhole on another male monkey just doesn't surprise me, nor do I find it gay considering teenage boys will stick their dicks in almost anything when the hormones are raging. Another kid allegedy got his dick stuck in a shampoo bottle, but that was always more of a rumor. Still, his name was Kurt, and everybody called him "Pert" for a while before it kind of went away. I still remember it, though.
