yeah if you are going to pretend you know more about what constitutes scientific knowledge than the worlds entire scientific community there really isn't. really, you claim to be neutral but it's obvious you are as jaded by creationist anti-science propaganda as any creationist is. same goes for platypus.
There's enough genetic variation among humans as well. Some of these variations are severe enough birth defects that the human in question doesn't survive (for long). You'd think this is evidence that fish in the process of evolving lungs died trying to breath air. We only really see the ones that succeeded. The rest may be incredibly hard to find in the fossil record... We might not even realize a fossil we find is a failed branch.
Hence the importance of observation. I can see a fossilized branch, too. That tells me nothing of how that branch was created, or how it evolved. But, I digress...
I never once denied that being gay is(or is not) genetic. I said it goes against the common theme of 'natural selection', as CrowTrobot was posting. I happen to believe that it is likely that there is a genetic component to true homosexuality. That said, in a truly natural setting, a species that becomes 100% homosexual, and practices sex solely that way, will become extinct barring the creation of compatible reproductive settings. Of course, once that happens, the question will be if the population is still 100% homosexual. Terrible rant, and labeling me a "homophobe" is not only disingenuous, it is false. By the way, if anybody has issues with sexuality here, crandc, it's you and your obvious disdain for heterosexual males. It's been the same act for what, 13 years now?
Ford Motor Company founder Henry Ford (1863–1947) invented the assembly line, a factory arrangement in which work passes from one operation to the next until workers (who remain stationary) complete the product. In 1913, ten years after he founded the Ford Motor Company, Ford installed the first moving assembly line in one of his automobile manufacturing plants. Because this innovation allowed cars to be produced quickly and efficiently, Ford could charge a lower price for his product and still make a profit. Soon ordinary people—not just the wealthy—could afford to own a car. By the late twentieth century, however, people began to recognize the negative aspects of the assembly line, including repetitive motion injuries and the dehumanization of the worker who could not control the pace of his or her job. Further Information: "The Arsenals of Progress." The Economist (US). March 5, 1994, pp. M5–8; Gourley, Catherine. Wheels of Time: A Picture Biography of Henry Ford. Brookfield, Conn.: Millbrook, 1997; Samuelson, Robert J. "The Assembly Line." Newsweek. Winter, 1997, pp. 18–22; WWW Virtual Library for the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine. Henry Ford Museum and Greenfield Village.
This is all hogwash. Everyone knows that the assembly line was created from nothing by Vishwakarma, the Hindu god of construction.
Until you morons stop believing in this unicorn called "evolution"; you will never be respected in here! Get up to speed fellas!
