Just sayin'. That's how it's been for a long time now. I don't think anyone ever has had Lamb ahead of Beal?
yeah, I know their players. Big dude and the light skinned dude. Thanks Jeremy, that's all the questions we have. Good luck to you.
I still like Lamb, his size, athleticism and scoring ability...obviously getting to talk with them and meet them in person and see what type of person\competitor they are is an important aspect... The kid can play, is he dumb as a rock? or just indifferent? both? niether? I certainly wouldn't categorize that interview as a positive for him, but I wouldn't rule him out either.... There have been PLENTY of great NBA players who were not the sharpest tools in the shed....The bottom line is talent and IQ ON the court.... Apparently no one remembers Travis Outlaw?
All this after telling us how we desperately need guys with a killer instinct and assassin mentality?
A few. You made it sound like everyone. I'd say more people on this board have had Beal in the top-5 for some time, while Lamb has never been THAT high. It's semantics. But anyone who picked on you for having Beal over Lamb (because they had Lamb over Beal) would be in the minority (like 1%). Therefore, they should be executed.
Travis Outlaw is exactly (one of) the reason(s) why I would avoid Lamb. I'd like to have someone who can understand what the play actually is. At least Outlaw seemed to care about what he was doing, even if he did it poorly for the first 3 quarters.